|

03-10-2008, 05:05 PM
|
|
Now was that nice!
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rocky River, Ohio (Cleveland)
1,015 posts, read 279,883 times
Reputation: 128
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by costello_musicman
Here's a side note that has always bothered me about Columbus:
City Areas 1950's:
Cleveland: 78 sq miles
Columbus: 72 sq miles
Cincinnati: 78 sq miles
City Areas 2008:
Cleveland: 78 sq miles
Columbus: 215 sq miles
Cincinnati: 78 sq miles
Columbus has really looked good on paper since the 1950's with new businesses/houses/more population, but it has done most of it by annexation of its suburbs until recent years. The endless statistics and positive media news has spurred people to stay and others to move into the area. Now I'm not saying this is the only reason, but I do truly believe it is a huge aspect. It will be interesting to see how Columbus does once it stops annexing...I believe the most recent was 2007?! But I hear there is still open land in the city limits?? If that is the case Columbus should be in good shape for a while.
To also put it in perpective, Cleveland would have 1 million+ if they added 4-5 miles east, south, and west.
My Rankings:
1) Cleveland (old city feel, 3 major sports, Orchestra/Theater District/Music Scene, Lakefront, skyline)
2) Cincinnati (cool downtown, 2 major sports/college sports, denser--easier to walk, skyline and skyline chili!)
3) Columbus (OSU!, shopping)
4) Toledo
5) Akron
6) Dayton
7) Canton
|
Thats is crazy! I had no idea if Cleveland annexed a little bit they could have over 1 million. As much as I hate it, that number makes me want them to just a little bit. 
|