POLL: Best skyline in Ohio? (Columbus, Cleveland: moving, cities, skyscraper)

[aquila]

It's kinda silly to see a discussion break down into whether or not a state's name can be spelled out in the silhouette of some skyscrapers.

[hillside]

Originally Posted by aquila

It's kinda silly to see a discussion break down into whether or not a state's name can be spelled out in the silhouette of some skyscrapers.

it's something interesting mr614 brought up. got anything better?

[1watertiger]

[1watertiger]

[hillside]

thank you, 1watertiger. the first pic is a really good view.

[aquila]

Originally Posted by hillside

it's something interesting mr614 brought up. got anything better?

It's not about whether it's an interesting thing to note. But when you guys start going back and forth with your "geez, are you blind? Can't you see it?" and "what are you smoking" crap, yes it gets silly. Just let it drop. It's stupid to call someone "blind" simply because they can't see it. Just move on.

[hillside]

aquila, i thought i did move on when i asked 1watertiger to contribute to the thread.

[aquila]

Originally Posted by hillside

aquila, i thought i did move on when i asked 1watertiger to contribute to the thread.

Well, as of the time you wrote your 11:11pm response to me, you HADN'T.

Forgive me for not getting online here at C-D until later this afternoon, but I was merely responding to that post to explain why I wrote what I did.

[hillside]

you're right about one thing - i did write that post to you. the problem is, 1watertiger responded constructively, and you responded at 3:22 pm today with more frustration.

[aquila]

NO, I was responding to post #52. You directed a statement toward me in that post.....I didn't get around to seeing that statement until this afternoon. I therefore took the time to RESPOND to that statement. Apparently what I'm trying to say to you right now is going way over your head, because I just explained this above in post #56.

Furthermore, my post #51 WASN'T EVEN ADDRESSED TO YOU! So why did you take it so personally that you felt you had to issue post#52 in the first place...??

GET OVER IT. I was simply clarifying to you why I said what I did in post #51. I can't help it if the chronological order of these posts fall one after another according to the time they are made. I could have sent you a DM, but I really didn't think it was THAT crucial, and certainly I didn't think you'd make such an issue of it. Tell you what....if you'd like, we both still have time to go back and delete our most recent posts. I'm game if you are. That way we can avoid this whole big thing, and from now on I'll just shut up.