|

04-18-2008, 03:54 AM
|
|
Senior Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
1,779 posts, read 895,010 times
|
|
|
As the discussion heats up, remember to respect each other, ok ?
Yac.
|
|

04-18-2008, 08:20 AM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Nature knows no indecencies; man invents them. -M. Twain"
(set 15 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
1,523 posts, read 1,094,714 times
Reputation: 172
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cle440
Did you understand a word that I said. Let me spell this out. lol
I brought up that Cleveland used to be the 5th largest city (1920), thats before any argument started. Then you brought up that Cincinnati was the 6th largest (1840). In that argument, Cleveland is much more relevant. I guess it was okay for you to bring up 160+ year old facts for Cincinnati.
My point is that when I bring up John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil without saying anything else (which is the same thing you did, but not as bad), you bring up Proctor & Gamble and say that what I said is not relevant, but YET you brought up Cincinnati before which was not relevant at all compared to what I was saying about Cleveland. But when I bring up 90+ year old facts for Cleveland you say it is not relevant. Do you understand what I am saying now?
When you bring up 160+ year old "irrelevant" data for Cincinnati, I guess its okay to you. BUT, when I bring up 90+ year old data for Cleveland, its not okay for you. You are being, biased, unfair, and a hypocrite.
|
What does:
Rockefeller
Standard Oil
Cleveland being the 5th largest city in the US
Have to do with 2008? How do any of these points helps Cleveland's growth today?
If your answer is yes, then how? If your answer is no, then why'd you bring them up?
|
|

04-18-2008, 12:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
1,076 posts, read 1,010,526 times
Reputation: 138
|
|
|
the argument, "cleveland is bigger because it used to be a giant" doesn't work with cincinnati because it too was major at a point in time. whether it's 1840 or 1920, it's not now. the two cities are on different cycles. cinci was 6th biggest in 1840 and bottomed out 50 years later. cleveland was 5th biggest in 1920 and bottomed out 50 years later. btw, cincinnati had 115,435 in 1850. cleveland had 17,034, 848 less folks than columbus.
|
|

04-18-2008, 02:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cleveland
2,348 posts, read 2,185,870 times
Reputation: 279
|
|
|
1st of all, this whole argument is a joke. I wasnt being serious about anything, its all just for fun.
Also, Cincy-Rise. I was talking about you, not me. I was saying that you brought up Cincinnati was the 6th largest city (in 1840). I guess that was okay for you, but when I do the same thing you did (bring up Standard Oil) you say that its not relevant, when I was doing the same thing you did, but I guess it was okay for you to do it.
I brought them up to show Clevelands history, and that it used to be even more important and large than it is now. Most people remember that Detroit used to be a giant as far as manufacturing (and still is), and population, and people remember when Detroit was nicer and had jobs, same can be said for Cleveland and its history. As far as why I brought them up, John D. Rockefeller helped Cleveland grow and shaped it to what the city was in its prime, also the size issue, those impacts are still felt in the city, so they are relevant. I was stating what things came from Cleveland. Like I said, it was all in good fun, no offense meant.
|
|

04-18-2008, 11:28 PM
|
|
Now was that nice!
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Rocky River, Ohio (Cleveland)
1,268 posts, read 1,314,614 times
Reputation: 190
|
|
|
Lets calm down guys. This thread has had a long history. We wouldn't want it to shut down because of a few arguements.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|