Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma > Oklahoma City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2008, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by n8tiv_okie View Post
Okay, I think the point that's being missed is WHY does an arena that's basically "new" need upgrades already? Should this not have been a concern BEFORE the first brick was laid?
Supposedly, back when it was slated to be constructed it was to be "one of the finest and most-advanced arenas" to bring an NHL team to OKC. Okay, so we didn't get an NHL team but why now, 5 years later is it not good enough for an NBA team? My opinion is because they wanted to do it on the cheap like most projects in Oklahoma. Also, so any pro team could decorate or renovate the arena how they wanted. To me, that is up to the team who accepts a contract to play in that building, NOT the citizens.
I have no interest in the NBA whatsoever. Sure, it brings tax dollars but where is the overall payoff for OKC? I would love an NHL team in OKC, but I don't expect the citizens to pay for one to play here.
As for being competitive with other states, it really involves more than just a pretty arena. Take into consideration the television and radio market, parking, weather and everything else including what the people actually want.
Me? I want better roads, better education for our children and better civil opportunities for the citizens. An NBA team won't bring that.
But I digress......
You gripe about OKC. Thats all I have to say and you most certainly have a right to your opinions.

But just to enlighten your knowledge and view of OKC...Since IMO it seems rather dismal.

Do you even know that OKC passed Maps for kids which generated almost a billion for building new schools and tons of upgrades. Shows how much you know about OKC.

Do you know that a 850M bond was passed to improve roads, sidewalks and infrastucture ect.?

Do you realize that Maps saved OKC and brought in over 2 billion for Downtown.

Do you understand that the Ford is over 6yrs old and that typical arenas get upgrades every 5 yrs if they have a Major league team. By the time all these imrovements are made the Ford will be close to 10 yrs old! So what if the arena was a shell to begin with, the city did a fantastic job on all the other projects. It was designed to bring in the NHL and was expected to be destroyed or improved. Instead, OKC hurdled over the NHL and got a way better deal with the NBA.

The NBA brings so much to the table that people like you just dont get it, because you cant see the BIG PICTURE. Especially one that thinks the Downtown library was the only good thing to come out of Maps (what a freakin' joke). Next time your at the library take a stroll over to OKCMOA and breath in the art from the Lourve thats currently on exhibit, then go watch a musical at the award winning Civic Center Music Hall. While your at it, walk back to the museum and see an independent film in an Art Deco theatre and look up at the Chihuly Waterford Crystal Chandelier which is one of only two in the world. Then think about it for a while.



You just dont have an up to date view on OKC.

Last edited by happytown; 01-30-2008 at 10:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2008, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Yukon, Oklahoma
120 posts, read 425,073 times
Reputation: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by happytown View Post
You gripe about OKC. Thats all I have to say and you most certainly have a right to your opinions.

But just to enlighten your knowledge and view of OKC...Since IMO it seems rather dismal.

Do you even know that OKC passed Maps for kids which generated almost a billion for building new schools and tons of upgrades. Shows how much you know about OKC.

Do you know that a 850M bond was passed to improve roads, sidewalks and infrastucture ect.?

Do you realize that Maps saved OKC and brought in over 2 billion for Downtown.

Do you understand that the Ford is over 6yrs old and that typical arenas get upgrades every 5 yrs if they have a Major league team. By the time all these imrovements are made the Ford will be close to 10 yrs old! So what if the arena was a shell to begin with, the city did a fantastic job on all the other projects. It was designed to bring in the NHL and was expected to be destroyed or improved. Instead, OKC hurdled over the NHL and got a way better deal with the NBA.

The NBA brings so much to the table that people like you just dont get it, because you cant see the BIG PICTURE. Especially one that thinks the Downtown library was the only good thing to come out of Maps (what a freakin' joke). Next time your at the library take a stroll over to OKCMOA and breath in the art from the Lourve thats currently on exhibit, then go watch a musical at the award winning Civic Center Music Hall. While your at it, walk back to the museum and see an independent film in an Art Deco theatre and look up at the Chihuly Waterford Crystal Chandelier which is one of only two in the world. Then think about it for a while.



You just dont have an up to date view on OKC.
you're probably correct on some of that. and I will agree my views are a bit skewed. I'm tainted goods though because I've done a lot of traveling in my days and have a lot to compare OKC to.
I have not, however, seen the newly renovated Civic Center, you're correct on that, I have not seen the new MOA since it's opening day. So I do agree with some of your comments.
I think MAPS was a good thing, I really do, I just think that some of the money was mis-spent. I agreed with the MAPS tax back in the day and I voted "yes" for it. I probably noticed the change due to MAPS more than most because I lived in California during most of the construction.
I'm not trying to sound like a sour-puss about things. I like to see OKC advance and become a better place to live. I just choose to whine and moan about the arena because I can

but seriously, I will check out the places you suggested. Sounds like something I should experience with the family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2008, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,887 posts, read 36,922,373 times
Reputation: 5663
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8tiv_okie View Post
you're probably correct on some of that. and I will agree my views are a bit skewed. I'm tainted goods though because I've done a lot of traveling in my days and have a lot to compare OKC to.
I have not, however, seen the newly renovated Civic Center, you're correct on that, I have not seen the new MOA since it's opening day. So I do agree with some of your comments.
I think MAPS was a good thing, I really do, I just think that some of the money was mis-spent. I agreed with the MAPS tax back in the day and I voted "yes" for it. I probably noticed the change due to MAPS more than most because I lived in California during most of the construction.
I'm not trying to sound like a sour-puss about things. I like to see OKC advance and become a better place to live. I just choose to whine and moan about the arena because I can

but seriously, I will check out the places you suggested. Sounds like something I should experience with the family.
You sound like an open minded person that is willing to discuss issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2008, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by n8tiv_okie View Post
you're probably correct on some of that. and I will agree my views are a bit skewed. I'm tainted goods though because I've done a lot of traveling in my days and have a lot to compare OKC to.
I have not, however, seen the newly renovated Civic Center, you're correct on that, I have not seen the new MOA since it's opening day. So I do agree with some of your comments.
I think MAPS was a good thing, I really do, I just think that some of the money was mis-spent. I agreed with the MAPS tax back in the day and I voted "yes" for it. I probably noticed the change due to MAPS more than most because I lived in California during most of the construction.
I'm not trying to sound like a sour-puss about things. I like to see OKC advance and become a better place to live. I just choose to whine and moan about the arena because I can

but seriously, I will check out the places you suggested. Sounds like something I should experience with the family.
You definitely sound more civil instead of just vote No,No.

Like I said it takes a contemporary vision that involves the BIG PICTURE. I hope you enjoy the Civic Center Music Hall and the MOA along with the rest of the Maps projects. It completely changed OKC for the better. It is completely obvious and I believe if the momentum keeps on going that you will see the city become better and better. But if this vote is knocked down, like I believe it will, there will be no NBA. This will result in less jobs and will become a trickle down effect that will cause future problems for the city and its people. The result will be bad for the long run and its sad that people cant gather the significance of a Major league team in OKC/Oklahoma. The person in charge of the 'maps for millionaires' has his own political mission and I truly wish that people in OKC can fully understand their vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2008, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Hughes County, Oklahoma
3,160 posts, read 10,620,799 times
Reputation: 1145
I still think it will pass, HT. I heard a lot of the same negatives before the recent school vote. That passed fairly easily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2008, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,887 posts, read 36,922,373 times
Reputation: 5663
I think it will pass too. What's good for OkC is what is good for the state of Oklahoma. It is, after all, our capital city (and a fine one at that).

The people of OkC have already come so far and they realize this will be good for the city as well as the state. And, I will say it AGAIN... OkC's sales tax is STILL less than Tulsa's!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2008, 06:43 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,583,593 times
Reputation: 4283
Quote:
Originally Posted by stiffnecked View Post
I second the NO vote. The Ford Center only benfits a very limited segment of the communtiy. They would be much better off supporting the new casino the Indians want to put in out by Edmond. It would provide over 1000 year-round jobs.

If a pro-basketball team wants to locate here they should pay there own way.
I'm A Ex-Tulsan 1976 To Present And I've Been There And Done That And Seen 40 Of These United States..Seen Almost All Of The Big Cities In America Lived In California For The Last 30 Years Give Or Take A Year Here And There And Have Come To Understand This..YOU CAN'T BE A WORLD CLASS CITY ON
THE EL CHEAPO..AND ALL Cities With Big Three Sports Franchises Are World Class Cities NBA..NFL..MLB..And Please Don't Be Short Sighted And Believe This My Friend When The Big Boys Come To Your Town They Are Going To Want Something To Do And To See..Ballet..Opera..Professional Sports At The Highest Level....I'm Talking About CEO Of Major Fortune 500 Companies And I'm Not Talking About 1,000 Low Paying Jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2008, 07:00 PM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831
Ford Center upgrades....110 million. OKC getting a NBA team. Priceless......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2008, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Dangling from a mooses antlers
7,308 posts, read 14,691,026 times
Reputation: 6238
Since Seattle is willing to let the Sonics go how long will it be before we see that whole place dry up and blow away? Will it just be doom and gloom in Seattle once the Sonics are gone?

Do you think those 200 Dell employees that got laid off will save there severance pay to buy tickets to pro basketball games?

There are much more needful things that OKC could spend that sales tax money on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2008, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Wind comes sweeping down the...
1,586 posts, read 6,758,436 times
Reputation: 831
Stiff- Those Dell empolyees have more than plenty of the same service jobs in other parts of the Metro, in case you havent seen or heard the news about it yet. The news also said it will not effect OKC AT ALL. Dell had to shift one department around and it happened to be OKCs. 200 jobs isnt the end of the world.

Stop making excuses for the Ford Center tax.

Go vote No and feel good about yourself, because you feel like you are doing the right thing. Bottom line...<Moderator cut>

I dont quite understand your first sentence, but I think I have an idea. You are proposing since Seattle can lose the Sonics, without their economy being effected, then OKCs economy would not recieve any benefits if the Sonics were to enter or leave our market.

Here is your answer...Seattle is a whole different world. They are one of the largest markets in the U.S. and have two other major league teams. In other words Seattle would not feel an economic impact with the Sonics leaving. But OKC would feel the impact along with the entire State of Oklahoma if a Major League team were to come or go. Not to mention the International coverage Oklahoma would get or lose. You really need to do some thinking about this. Your opinions are respected, but they can be off key at the same time. By the way, this is the same silly arguement that Slade the Blade Gordon (Seattles attorney) is formulating for why the Sonics should stay in Seattle. He is proposing that Seattles market would be devastated if the Sonics were to leave as leverage for Seattles case, since Major Cornett has told reporters that OKC would benefit greatly by having a NBA team. Unfortunately for their case against the Sonics/OKC/Bennett....what happens in Seattle is not what happens in Oklahoma or OKC. This is designed to buy more time for Seattle.

We are a small market. We live in Oklahoma, not Washington or New York. Like I have said before, this shows the World and the U.S. what Oklahoma can do (NBA is International). This could lead to Tulsa getting the NHL in the future, but it could also be a complete reversal if OKC doesnt get the NBA. This is for our STATE not just OKC.

Last edited by peggydavis; 02-03-2008 at 09:12 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oklahoma > Oklahoma City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top