|

07-02-2009, 10:51 AM
|
|
Happy Holidays.
Status:
"White Christmas was nice"
(set 23 hours ago)
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha
2,517 posts, read 2,112,065 times
Reputation: 640
|
|
|
Well, Kansas City also has a land area of 318 sq. mi and sprawls across 4 counties, while Omaha has a land area 119 Sq Mi and is only in Douglas county.
|
|

07-02-2009, 01:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
147 posts, read 86,470 times
Reputation: 37
|
|
|
That's fascinating. Someone posted an article on here not too long ago that said Omaha was one of the most compact cities for its size. I guess, even though we have sprawl, it's much worse in other parts of the country.
|
|

07-02-2009, 01:23 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Omaha
2,735 posts, read 1,377,234 times
Reputation: 971
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahajosh618
That's fascinating. Someone posted an article on here not too long ago that said Omaha was one of the most compact cities for its size. I guess, even though we have sprawl, it's much worse in other parts of the country.
|
It's actually considered in the top 5 or 6 for all US cities. Right up there with NY, SF, Honolulu, and Portland.
You can find that info at smartgrowth.org.
|
|

07-02-2009, 01:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Omaha, NE
147 posts, read 86,470 times
Reputation: 37
|
|
|
Thanks that-guy!
|
|

07-12-2009, 07:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Downtown Omaha
493 posts, read 256,259 times
Reputation: 57
|
|
|
At one point in its history, Omaha was bigger than KC or Denver.
|
|

07-14-2009, 10:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: City of Thorns
542 posts, read 423,536 times
Reputation: 153
|
|
|
I think Omaha is the perfect size & population. Bigger isn't necessarily better.
|
|

07-14-2009, 10:10 PM
|
|
Can't be contained
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hell with palm trees.
2,215 posts, read 773,558 times
Reputation: 844
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nephthys
I think Omaha is the perfect size & population. Bigger isn't necessarily better.
|
I'd like some taller buildings downtown, but beyond that I'm happy with where Omaha is at, for the most part.
|
|

07-14-2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: City of Thorns
542 posts, read 423,536 times
Reputation: 153
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosco55David
I'd like some taller buildings downtown, but beyond that I'm happy with where Omaha is at, for the most part.
|
True, Omaha does move slow in that department. I think it definitely needs to grow up instead of out.
|
|

07-14-2009, 10:35 PM
|
|
Can't be contained
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hell with palm trees.
2,215 posts, read 773,558 times
Reputation: 844
|
|
|
Thankfully we'll have the Wall Street Tower...someday...and the downtown master plan called for some taller buildings.
|
|

07-14-2009, 10:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"In Exile"
(set 20 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
5,207 posts, read 1,774,186 times
Reputation: 1818
|
|
I wish they'd get going on that Wall Street Tower, but I understand that it's not quite that easy.
I do think that Omaha is situated in a great place for solid, good growth. Heavy on medical and education, there is industrial diversity. Housing didn't go ape-crazy like it did in a lot of cities 5 years ago, so we don't have the bust going on that others do.
I think the next 10 years are going to be VERY good and exciting years for Omaha! 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|