Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska > Omaha
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2010, 12:17 AM
 
3,284 posts, read 3,523,179 times
Reputation: 1832

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedes-Benz View Post
There is no such thing as a "Better space heater" in terms of how well it converts electrical energy into heat energy. 1,500 Watts of BTU heat will always equal 1,500 Watts of BTU heat. Sure different space heaters will distribute the heat differently and use different methods like radiant vs convection but the end result is the exact same thing.

When shopping for a space heater read the labels on the back. 90% of them will say 1,500 watts maximum. The other 10% only go up to around 600 watts or 900 watts.

The reason why some people are saving money using their electric space heaters is because they are doing so wisely. They are heating a small space. Their gas heaters are inefficient. Their house is huge compared to the area sectioned off to their bedroom. Also their utility company might charge them a whole let less for 1 kilowatt of electricity vs someone living in a different part of the country. Same with natural gas prices and home heating oil prices.

You should take more science and physics classes. Even I know this stuff and I didn't graduate from college.
Not true, radiant heating is more efficient than convection when in small spaces. Convection circulates the air while radiant heats areas within its line of sight range, thus not needing to circulate heated air within that space. Infrared radiant heat isn't exactly quantified as an equal like you would believe.

There is also a difference between vented and unvented... the unvented inside a home would demand additional energy to ventilate the air. See, you cannot just generalize these heaters, heater man.

Put that in your heater and smoke it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2010, 06:53 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,662,881 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedes-Benz View Post
There is no such thing as a "Better space heater" in terms of how well it converts electrical energy into heat energy. 1,500 Watts of BTU heat will always equal 1,500 Watts of BTU heat. Sure different space heaters will distribute the heat differently and use different methods like radiant vs convection but the end result is the exact same thing.

When shopping for a space heater read the labels on the back. 90% of them will say 1,500 watts maximum. The other 10% only go up to around 600 watts or 900 watts.

The reason why some people are saving money using their electric space heaters is because they are doing so wisely. They are heating a small space. Their gas heaters are inefficient. Their house is huge compared to the area sectioned off to their bedroom. Also their utility company might charge them a whole let less for 1 kilowatt of electricity vs someone living in a different part of the country. Same with natural gas prices and home heating oil prices.

You should take more science and physics classes. Even I know this stuff and I didn't graduate from college.
Did I say there were better heaters "in terms of how they convert electrical energy into heat energy"?

And are you going to deny the fact that some space heaters are better than others?


But hey, knock yourself out Mister Non-College Graduate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 10:23 AM
 
71 posts, read 130,886 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
Did I say there were better heaters "in terms of how they convert electrical energy into heat energy"?

And are you going to deny the fact that some space heaters are better than others?


But hey, knock yourself out Mister Non-College Graduate.
Well. It's a free country. You can believe whatever you want to believe. I'm just sharing some information I had gathered. That's all. I mean no offense to you or your ego.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 10:27 AM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,662,881 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedes-Benz View Post
Well. It's a free country. You can believe whatever you want to believe. I'm just sharing some information I had gathered. That's all. I mean no offense to you or your ego.
What does my ego have to do with your inability to read?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 10:27 AM
 
71 posts, read 130,886 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jays1983 View Post
Not true, radiant heating is more efficient than convection when in small spaces. Convection circulates the air while radiant heats areas within its line of sight range, thus not needing to circulate heated air within that space. Infrared radiant heat isn't exactly quantified as an equal like you would believe.

There is also a difference between vented and unvented... the unvented inside a home would demand additional energy to ventilate the air. See, you cannot just generalize these heaters, heater man.

Put that in your heater and smoke it...
So are you saying that a convection heater is less efficient because it needs a fan with an electric motor to vent the heat? If that is what you are saying I don't agree with that statement either. Even if some of that 1,500 watts has to be used to run an electric motor; that energy passing through the motors brushes still gets converted into heat energy. Which is exactly what you would want inside your house on a cold winter day. None of that 1,500 watts gets wasted. Electricity is the most purest form of energy there is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 11:56 AM
 
3,284 posts, read 3,523,179 times
Reputation: 1832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercedes-Benz View Post
So are you saying that a convection heater is less efficient because it needs a fan with an electric motor to vent the heat? If that is what you are saying I don't agree with that statement either. Even if some of that 1,500 watts has to be used to run an electric motor; that energy passing through the motors brushes still gets converted into heat energy. Which is exactly what you would want inside your house on a cold winter day. None of that 1,500 watts gets wasted. Electricity is the most purest form of energy there is.
I was just giving examples of two different forms of space heaters which aren't equal in efficiency mainly because of function. I found it very hard to believe with all the different designs that they are euqualy efficient.

Either way, we are talking about space heaters. This is as far as I can go with this debate. lol

Last edited by Jays1983; 01-07-2010 at 01:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 12:48 PM
 
71 posts, read 130,886 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
What does my ego have to do with your inability to read?
Lest I've been mistaken; I've always thought that folks from Omaha were very friendly, warm and inviting. What gives? Maybe all the snow shoveling must be getting on some peoples nerves recently.

I stated what I knew from experience. And someone always has to insult my intelligence. Well, no good deed goes unpunished.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Omaha
50 posts, read 49,171 times
Reputation: 14
I think people sometimes get confused about running a furnace, and automatically think that it's less efficient than cooling down your place, and having a space heater going.

Every time you let your house cool way down- your furnace has to run a longer amount of time to compensate for how cold your place is.

I try and keep my place at a cold 65 all the time. Slippers, Hooded sweatshirts.

If I had kids I wouldn't keep my place this cold.


For those of you running electric space heaters and shutting off your furnace... How do you shower and get ready for the day when it's so *$@(% cold???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,131,824 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by MATTDAMON View Post
I think people sometimes get confused about running a furnace, and automatically think that it's less efficient than cooling down your place, and having a space heater going.

Every time you let your house cool way down- your furnace has to run a longer amount of time to compensate for how cold your place is.
Yeah yeah, people keep telling me this, as if I should believe them instead of my own utility bills. As I said before, it takes all of 15 minutes to get my apartment back up to room temperature once it fires back on, so it's not like the furnace struggles mightily to "catch up" or any such nonsense. Maybe it would be different if I had a 4,000sqft McMansion or something. But I don't.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MATTDAMON View Post
For those of you running electric space heaters and shutting off your furnace... How do you shower and get ready for the day when it's so *$@(% cold???
Modern thermostats have timers. You set it to turn on right before you get up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2010, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Omaha
50 posts, read 49,171 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Yeah yeah, people keep telling me this, as if I should believe them instead of my own utility bills. As I said before, it takes all of 15 minutes to get my apartment back up to room temperature once it fires back on, so it's not like the furnace struggles mightily to "catch up" or any such nonsense. Maybe it would be different if I had a 4,000sqft McMansion or something. But I don't.



Modern thermostats have timers. You set it to turn on right before you get up.

Some of us live in 100 year old buildings. Furthermore - I looked at your profile and noticed you are from California.

Do you even know what it's like to live in a climate that dips into the -30s? I have lived in Omaha, Duluth, and Ann Arbor Michigan and for some reason I **** you not - Omaha seems to be the coldest the most often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nebraska > Omaha
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top