Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Orange County
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2017, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,537,436 times
Reputation: 35437

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by crabtrees View Post
From what I'm seeing down in south orange county, properties are staying on the market longer than they have the past two years, despite what I consider an extreme shortage of units on the market. Using my condo complex as an example, it was practically the norm for any condo that hit the market to be in escrow within one week. Now, very nice updated units that are listed at top price are sitting for weeks. I guess I have no way of knowing if they are receiving offers, but there doesn't seem to be a mad rush to buy like there was the past 24 months.

We're just slowing down a bit. Sometimes people have to catch up with prices or re-evaluate. Unless its grossly overpriced it will eventually sell. The higher the price the smaller the buyer pool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2017, 09:38 AM
 
209 posts, read 263,768 times
Reputation: 337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
We're just slowing down a bit. Sometimes people have to catch up with prices or re-evaluate. Unless its grossly overpriced it will eventually sell. The higher the price the smaller the buyer pool.
There are 2 units on my street competing against each other. I believe they are priced $10k-$15k more than they are worth (both priced a bit below $500k). But you have a good point, I have gotten so used to seeing units sell so quickly that it now seems odd when a home is on the market 3-4 weeks, which is still probably considered a quick sell when compared to historical time on the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,537,436 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by crabtrees View Post
There are 2 units on my street competing against each other. I believe they are priced $10k-$15k more than they are worth (both priced a bit below $500k). But you have a good point, I have gotten so used to seeing units sell so quickly that it now seems odd when a home is on the market 3-4 weeks, which is still probably considered a quick sell when compared to historical time on the market.
It's either gonna take a little while to find a buyer willing to pop for the additional 10/15k or one of the sellers is gonna wanna sell it and drop the price to meet a buyer.
If I was selling and I had competition I would
1. drop the price a bit to go below my competition to make the property more attractive to get the buyer and create competition for my property.
Or
2. I could offer a good amount to help with closing costs right off the bat.

Ultimately it's a game on attracting buyers.


That's what I do when I list a rental. I look at the going rate and go a bit below (100-150 bucks). I do it because it gets more traffic and I can get it rented faster because it becomes more desirable. And I tend to have higher acceptance requirements and applicants that meet those requirements are who I want to attract. So the lower price and the exceptional condition I keep my rentals in I'm looking to attract tenants with high incomes, great credit, no background isssues and are not problematic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,810,729 times
Reputation: 39453
Wait.


I look back at the history of our house in Santa Ana. In the early middle 1990s, it was appraised at $350,000 and listed for $275,000. Then a down cycle came. We bought it for $175,000 in 1996 during a market recession. We did a lot of work on it and spend some money on upgrades/restoration but less than $100,000, probably less than $50,000. The value climbed steadily with seemingly no end in sight. We sold it in 2005 for $757,00. In about 2008, it was listed for around $650,000 (after the buyer put $200,000 into it, much of which actually de-valued it, some of which improved it). Eventually it was foreclosed on and sold for $454,000 (about 2009). Later it sold I think for somewhere in the mid $500,000s. Then it sold for $629,000 in 2014 and Redfin has it currently estimated at $729,000 (Zillow says $764). I Certainly wouldn't (and couldn't) buy it now. It will cycle back down. Probably not to $454 and certainly not to $175,000, but likely to the $500K range. Remember you have to pay taxes based on your purchase price. It always cycles. People, especially realtors who want you to buy now when it is high and commissions are huge always say "Not this time. This time is different" Then it cycles again, ragains value and they say "Not this time" . . . The general trend is up but within that trend it will cycle several times over the years or decades. Waiting can save you hundreds of thousands.

Of course they could be right. This may be the one time in history real estate does nto cycle like it always has and just keeps going up forever. Maybe something is different this time (except it isn't).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 03:42 PM
 
3,437 posts, read 3,286,809 times
Reputation: 2508
that's why there is Economic Cycle for a reason. that's just fact. when? we don't know but it will come.


and if the downturn comes during Trumps reign, too bad. you are only 1-term prez. it will also reinforce the observation that Repub prez inherit a good economy only to ruin it. but in reality, its just economic cycle working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 04:03 PM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,986,718 times
Reputation: 5985
Of course real estate is cyclical. No one is saying that there won't be a downturn in real estate in any major California Metro. That's EXPECTED.

But let's look at actual data. Let's use the the Bay Area which is probably the hottest real estate market in all of California at the moment.

Using the Case Shiller we see 3 downturns.

- 1990 peak, bottoms out in 1996
- 2001 Dot Com peak, bottoms out late 2002.
- 2006 Bubble Peak, 2012 bottom.



After each peak, we do indeed see a downturn, but almost on point, we also see a corresponding rise in prices where the NEW peak actually exceeds the last peak, and we also see the next "downturn" is actually HIGHER than the previous peak. The only time we don't see this in the past 40 years is during the 2006 bubble where low-end homes crashed a lot harder than mid-tier and higher-tier homes since lower-tier homes were inflated more due to subprime loans.

So no, prices won't rise "forever", but they won't fall back to a place where "affordability" is better than the previous cycle. We have decades of data that supports this conclusion.

Real estate is nearly ALWAYS a good buy if you are holding long. If you're a flipper, or a pure investor, then you have to time your entry and exit in finer terms. Primary home? Buy when it makes financial sense to you, and hold more than 10 years? You will be just fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,537,436 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by payutenyodagimas View Post
that's why there is Economic Cycle for a reason. that's just fact. when? we don't know but it will come.


and if the downturn comes during Trumps reign, too bad. you are only 1-term prez. it will also reinforce the observation that Repub prez inherit a good economy only to ruin it. but in reality, its just economic cycle working.
Unfortunately it was a "good" economy because of the MASSIVE influx of money and low interest rates. They threw everything they could at it to get the economy going. Because it sure took a long time to get it moving.
So don't go giving Obama too much credit. It took DOUBLING the national debt. Personally I think if they would of let it crash completely we would be better off now. You don't now he's a 1 term. It's only been what 4 months? He's got a long way to go
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 04:27 PM
 
6,089 posts, read 4,986,718 times
Reputation: 5985
Quote:
Originally Posted by payutenyodagimas View Post
that's why there is Economic Cycle for a reason. that's just fact. when? we don't know but it will come.


and if the downturn comes during Trumps reign, too bad. you are only 1-term prez. it will also reinforce the observation that Repub prez inherit a good economy only to ruin it. but in reality, its just economic cycle working.
At what cost? What did Obama have to do to create a "good economy"?



Obama is the BIGGEST national debt creator in the history of the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2017, 04:31 PM
 
3,437 posts, read 3,286,809 times
Reputation: 2508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electrician4you View Post
Unfortunately it was a "good" economy because of the MASSIVE influx of money and low interest rates. They threw everything they could at it to get the economy going. Because it sure took a long time to get it moving.
So don't go giving Obama too much credit. It took DOUBLING the national debt. Personally I think if they would of let it crash completely we would be better off now. You don't now he's a 1 term. It's only been what 4 months? He's got a long way to go

am not giving him too much credit. as ive said, economic cycle. and if the downturns occurs in your watch, you know what happens. happens to carter, Bush, W Bush although it happens late in his watch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2017, 08:56 AM
 
1,134 posts, read 404,804 times
Reputation: 912
Consumer debt pushing to record levels is something to keep an eye on, at least that's what I keep reading. When home prices were getting close to the peak of 2006-2007, I remember new home buyers, coworkers of mine, saying real estate prices are just going to keep going up. Their advice was "Buy Buy Buy! Hurry!" Well we saw how that turned out. The catalyst for a drop will be different this time, but something tells me we're going to see one before too long, even if it won't be as much as before. That consumer debt is probably going to be a part of the puzzle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Orange County

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top