Quote:
Originally Posted by northbayeric
Freedom is 100% correct on most of the things he posts. But not this one. Library privatization seems to be working out pretty well in Redding, CA (Shasta County) and other places it's been tried (I want to say in Riverside, CA, but I'm not sure I've got the correct place). But with Google, Web 2.0 and all of the new ways people can send and receive information....libraries are as or more relevant in our 21st century society than ever. They're a heckuva lot more than just places to read and check out books. Visit your local library and find out for yourself. 
|
Alright!, dinosaurs was an exaggeration, I think I wrote that when the "tax the property owners", again.... movement was taking place....but to those with means, (the one's who generally pay for them), they are not valued as much, due to the internet, and online purchasing, and online research ability.
My kids would use the county library when it was open, checking out lots of books, kind of dirty and nasty when I think about it, I don't think they sanitize them.
When the tax levy went on the ballot we did the math and they could buy 10 books ea. month and it would be less than the tax increase that got piled on in the name of saving the libraries. Granted the library was not getting the whole tax increase, but it was singled out as the reason to tax more.
We pay $5,700 per yr. on just our house. The increase would have put it at $8,700 per yr.
That's not counting the other investment and development properties that we own (thats a laugh
own).
Anyway a more fair process for everyone is a user fee, or donation based private system. Hopefully one that does not include a librarian making over $100,000 per yr.
Freedom