Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2012, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
10,990 posts, read 20,565,114 times
Reputation: 8261

Advertisements

Our European heritage is basically folks with roots in Great Brittan, Germany, Scandinavia - very northern. There is a reason why we don't have much in the way of Italian or Greek cuisine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2012, 12:21 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,143,960 times
Reputation: 5860
The truth of the matter is, they came from everywhere.

From an old post, here is a break-down I did for birthplaces for Oregonians in the 1860 census:
  • Foreign countries: Spain 4, Australia 9, Russia 12, Mexico 19, Italy 28, Norway 34, Denmark 44, Sweden 49, Switzerland 60, Scotland 168, Germany 246, Canada 432, England 478, Ireland 1009. Total = 2592
  • New-England: RI 30, NH 122, CT 140, VT 209, ME 279, MA 376. Total = 1156
  • Mid-Atlantic: DE 31, MD 186, PA 894, NY 1513. Total = 2624
  • South-east: FL 6, MS 18, GA 53, AL 57, SC 65, NC 288, VA 813. Total = 1300
  • Mid-west: MI 89, IA 311, IN 946, IL 1013, OH 1753. Total = 4112
  • South-central: TX 12, AR 76, TN 819, KY 1278, MO 1442. Total = 3627
  • West: WA 25, CA 48, OR 531. Total = 604

    Total US Born = 13423
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 02:51 AM
 
Location: The heart of Cascadia
1,327 posts, read 3,180,478 times
Reputation: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
The truth of the matter is, they came from everywhere.

From an old post, here is a break-down I did for birthplaces for Oregonians in the 1860 census:
  • Foreign countries: Spain 4, Australia 9, Russia 12, Mexico 19, Italy 28, Norway 34, Denmark 44, Sweden 49, Switzerland 60, Scotland 168, Germany 246, Canada 432, England 478, Ireland 1009. Total = 2592
  • New-England: RI 30, NH 122, CT 140, VT 209, ME 279, MA 376. Total = 1156
  • Mid-Atlantic: DE 31, MD 186, PA 894, NY 1513. Total = 2624
  • South-east: FL 6, MS 18, GA 53, AL 57, SC 65, NC 288, VA 813. Total = 1300
  • Mid-west: MI 89, IA 311, IN 946, IL 1013, OH 1753. Total = 4112
  • South-central: TX 12, AR 76, TN 819, KY 1278, MO 1442. Total = 3627
  • West: WA 25, CA 48, OR 531. Total = 604

    Total US Born = 13423
Interesting, Oregon has a pretty southern heritage!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
My long term ancestors were a mixed bunch. One branch of the family was from New York originally, via Ohio. One 4great-grandmother started on the Oregon Trail and her husband died earlier. When she got to Joplin they wouldn't take her on the wagon train without a husband, so she married a guy from Missouri. Her daughter married a Scot who indentured himself to a New Zealand sheep station for 5 years before working off his passage to Oregon, where his brother had already settled. Their daughter married my grandfather, who was born in Pennsylvania 1863, left home when he was 15 and booted all over the west doing cattle drives, mining silver, etc. before ending in Oregon in 1893. His ancestors were Scot and Pennsylvania Deutsch. My father married a 100% German girl who came to Oregon from Nebraska as a refugee from the dust bowl.

5great-grandfather was pretty flush. When he arrived in 1845 he bought Louis LaBonte's claim. He was probably smart. In the early years, everybody had lots of money, but there was nothing to spend it on. The French trappers were the first to arrive, but they were mountain men, and I think LaBonte was ready to move on. I went to school with a kid named LaFollett, whose ancestors were here before mine were.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
10,990 posts, read 20,565,114 times
Reputation: 8261
Thanks EnricoV, that is very interesting. My Oregon Pioneer (1/4 my heritage) were all from MO. GGMother's family settled in what is now Shasta County, GGFather the mid-Willamette Valley. GGMother's extended family, Shelton, were early explorers. Her uncle founded Shelton Washington and was in the first WA State Legislature. The descendent's of GGFather's extended family, Bevins, are still well represented in the mid-Willamette Valley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,143,960 times
Reputation: 5860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Caldwell View Post
5great-grandfather was pretty flush. When he arrived in 1845 he bought Louis LaBonte's claim. He was probably smart. In the early years, everybody had lots of money, but there was nothing to spend it on. The French trappers were the first to arrive, but they were mountain men, and I think LaBonte was ready to move on. I went to school with a kid named LaFollett, whose ancestors were here before mine were.
Louis LaBonte was likely doing some pretty good speculating. Land settled prior to Oregon actually becoming a part of the United States ... they didn't know whether the claims would be honored or not. Turned out, they were honored by the U.S. But guys like LaBonte (and I had an ancestor who did the same thing) sold off the rights to the first claim they made (under the provisional government) and made a new claim under the U.S. government. LaBonte and his many descendants mostly stayed where they were in Marion County. He's buried in St. Paul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Myrtle Creek, Oregon
15,293 posts, read 17,681,555 times
Reputation: 25236
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnricoV View Post
Louis LaBonte was likely doing some pretty good speculating. Land settled prior to Oregon actually becoming a part of the United States ... they didn't know whether the claims would be honored or not. Turned out, they were honored by the U.S. But guys like LaBonte (and I had an ancestor who did the same thing) sold off the rights to the first claim they made (under the provisional government) and made a new claim under the U.S. government. LaBonte and his many descendants mostly stayed where they were in Marion County. He's buried in St. Paul.
That's interesting about LaBonte. I never knew where he ended up. That ggfather's daughter, my ancestor, didn't come with the rest of the family because her husband was sick. She started out the next spring and he died on the trail. She and her Missouri replacement husband took the Applegate Trail in 1846, he got into a fight as the result of road rage, and ended up with either a broken arm or leg, I'm not clear. Anyway, they abandoned their wagon around Canyonville and headed north to Dayton, where they spent the winter in LaBonte's original trapper cabin. The next spring they homesteaded near what would be Ballston. My mother still owns 75 acres of the original donation land claim filed in 1847.

An interesting footnote on women's rights is that the original homestead was 320 acres for a man and 640 acres for a husband and wife. That ancestor, Rachel Davidson, by all accounts was a hard woman. She figured 320 acres were hers, so when Andrew died she kept her land. When she died, she willed it to her daughters, who in turn willed it to their daughters, which is how my grandmother came to have it. She would have willed it to her daughter, but that daughter married a Wyoming cattle rancher who measured his ranch in square miles. My dad wanted to farm, so he got the land. My grandfather was a wheeler-dealer who wanted to sell the land around 1913 and invest the money, but my grandmother wouldn't let him. They would have been better off to let her manage the money, since he lost every nickel he ever earned. He was the Ford dealer in Newberg when my dad was born, but decided the Maxwell was the coming thing, so he sold the Ford dealership and bought the Maxwell dealership.

By the time the depression rolled around he was raising sheep and pasturing them in the Coast Range. He was pretty much the classic Horatio Alger drifter with a good spiel, looking for his fortune in the West and generally not finding it. He eventually could afford to retire, thanks to my grandmother's ability to handle money. I was 14 years old when he died, and stayed with him on weekends for the last 3 years of his life. I had many days to listen to the stories of a man who was born 2 years before the Civil War ended, who was at the Chicago Exposition at the turn of the century in 1900, worked trail drives from Texas to Kansas and mined silver in Colorado. He wasn't the greatest role model, but he sure was interesting, and loved to talk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 08:29 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
6,413 posts, read 12,143,960 times
Reputation: 5860
Do you know where the cabin was? There was a survey done in 1856, that's just great. It shows all the features of the land. The buildings, the plowed fields, trails, roads, etc. It's a great picture of their lives.

Good for Rachel. But in actual fact, the land was hers. One of my favorite things about Oregon history is the fact that the Donation Land Claims, if they got a married man's claim, half of it was the property of the wife. Usually when the American government gave land, it all went to the men. I love that the donation land claim where the city of Seaside now sits was given in its entirety (the full 640 acre claim because her husband had died) was given to the Indian wife of a Hudson's Bay man. Love the way it bucked the trend of handing things out to white males.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 10:43 PM
 
Location: The heart of Cascadia
1,327 posts, read 3,180,478 times
Reputation: 848
Actually I guess Oregon's heritage is still much more 'northern'. The numbers of foreign people is pretty interesting too. I wonder how the make up has changed since 1860? Obviously more Californians and Mexicans, I wonder how else though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 11:12 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,764,474 times
Reputation: 22087
The vast majority of Oregonians came from nearly any state, that was largely settled by White Europeans or from Europe itself. Quite a number came from Scandinavian ancestry for the lumber and fishing industry. Not just one state, or country. To this day, the state is not diverse racially, and by ethnics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top