Breast Feeding in Public (actor, married, baby, people)

[Nea1]

Originally Posted by momof2dfw

Victoria's Secret, those men need the old Playtex 18 hour bras of yesteryears. You know the ones that were built like bowling ball carriers.

yea yea, my grandmas bras!!!!!! those things would hold a bowling ball!!!! we could use them for grocery sacks!!

[Cosmic]

This idea that normal bodily functions can be obscene has to be a modern theory.

Just remember way, way, way back in human experience the man's job was to **** (as in biological form of watering) on campfires before breaking camp. It had many functions, gave starter charcoal if that camp was used again, prevented forest fires, provided group bonding experience, prevented a smoke signal to those attempting to follow their trail and proved to the females the men were useful for something. Only men have the total control and directional stability required for delicate tasks such as this. Plus they can take up a "Proper Standoff Position.

At the same time females where probably chowing down the wee ones. Zero in the way of choices for anybody. Just Man / Woman in raw nature doing God's Work. Nothing was considered sexual or lewd or obscene. Lil 4 year olds could and did put their head anywhere.

Even today those ancient rituals come back into play. Men at urinals still feel the tug to be accurate and smell the smoke in their collective memories.

Women are probably doing the same thing. This boobie in the the free air may also be a long supressed desire to return to the free natural way of living of our ancestors. Probably could be defended in court under the Natural Law theory.

Even today the genes call man back to those long ago times. All campfires still bring on the urges, especially if sat around boozing and listening to foxhounds in an ancient tribal endeavor. Lewd is being a kid and having to ride in the back seat with one of them big old hounds slobbering on you.

Somewhere some genes / wires got crossed and we get this type of blitter about natural acts. Modesty is a modern invention.

[Ms.Charlotte]

Originally Posted by Cosmic

Just remember way, way, way back in human experience the man's job was to **** (as in biological form of watering) on campfires before breaking camp. It had many functions, gave starter charcoal if that camp was used again, prevented forest fires, provided group bonding experience, prevented a smoke signal to those attempting to follow their trail and proved to the females the men were useful for something. Only men have the total control and directional stability required for delicate tasks such as this. Plus they can take up a "Proper Standoff Position.

Hmm, there's something disturbing about that entire paragraph.

[Cosmic]

Originally Posted by Ms.Charlotte

Hmm, there's something disturbing about that entire paragraph.

People want to read hidden meanings into very natural acts. They want to see PC type symbolic connections that prove their pet theories, agendas and prattle has a larger meaning. As in God meant it to be some particular way.

In fact early man's actions around the campfire was not some slick division of labor scheme. Everybody did what they were best at in a World driven by a need to survive with the least effort.

Only modern women would see the job different. Dial 911, report fire in a 3 thousand word description, wait 3 hours, while 27 other men scramble massive amount of equipment, drive 50 miles, use other manmade hoses to spray gallons of water on the blaze in a totally sledge hammer approach to accomplish what ancient man could do with about a quart / more or less. Those actions probably while her own DH and sons are sitting in the car reading the Wall Street Journal waiting to go down the trail. Signs would also have to be posted with instructions about campfires and somebody might get a citation for improper procedures.

Same with the milk process. Massive number of steps, expense and fuss what was once accomplished in a little more time than the man's chores.

Could it be that idea of a Man having an exclusive job that only he can do. The Modern Miss really do not like that idea at all and will bear any expense to stamp out old methods.

Or could it be all ancient methods are on the chopping block in a massive conspiracy to control any backsliding to more productive times, including controlling the use of early milk bottles to some legal approved method, sanctioned by other than the actual participants??

Same old story, Modern Man / Woman can never be in charge of running their own lives without an expert determining what is legal, proper or issuing the neccessary paper chit to allow it to happen as scheduled.

[Nea1]

Originally Posted by Cosmic

People want to read hidden meanings into very natural acts. They want to see PC type symbolic connections that prove their pet theories, agendas and prattle has a larger meaning. As in God meant it to be some particular way.

In fact early man's actions around the campfire was not some slick division of labor scheme. Everybody did what they were best at in a World driven by a need to survive with the least effort.

Only modern women would see the job different. Dial 911, report fire in a 3 thousand word description, wait 3 hours, while 27 other men scramble massive amount of equipment, drive 50 miles, use other manmade hoses to spray gallons of water on the blaze in a totally sledge hammer approach to accomplish what ancient man could do with about a quart / more or less. Those actions probably while her own DH and sons are sitting in the car reading the Wall Street Journal waiting to go down the trail. Signs would also have to be posted with instructions about campfires and somebody might get a citation for improper procedures.

Same with the milk process. Massive number of steps, expense and fuss what was once accomplished in a little more time than the man's chores.

Could it be that idea of a Man having an exclusive job that only he can do. The Modern Miss really do not like that idea at all and will bear any expense to stamp out old methods.

Or could it be all ancient methods are on the chopping block in a massive conspiracy to control any backsliding to more productive times, including controlling the use of early milk bottles to some legal approved method, sanctioned by other than the actual participants??

Same old story, Modern Man / Woman can never be in charge of running their own lives without an expert determining what is legal, proper or issuing the neccessary paper chit to allow it to happen as scheduled.

If a man feels the need to pee on the fire than let them!!! Who cares as long as it is put out. I think they just like to hear the hissing noise.

[Nea1]

Originally Posted by Ms.Charlotte

I think we should let this thread die. Something is wrong when a person's only posts are about sexual predators and the supposed sexuality of breastfeeding.

We're having fun with the ridiculousness of it, but we're also giving someone with some serious issues an audience.

I think your right, I made my last post to roadkill. The person needs serious help!!!

[Nea1]

Yea I shouldnt of posted, couldnt help myself no more though, it is just the completely out off line attitude and comments!!! Where is my punching bag!!???

[momof2dfw]

Now I feel really sorry also for new mom's. If a lactation-fanatic person see's you giving your baby a bottle in public they make rude comments to you w/o knowing all the info. Then you have loonballs like this that if they see a new mom breastfeeding in public think some kind of perverted sex act is going on. Geez, just can't make everyone happy..........

[MelissaB]

Wow.... I can't believe I just read what I did. I didn't even read it all either.

Breast were made for breastfeeding.... man turned them into something sexual. So now, the sexual man can tell us what to do and what not to do with our breast that are naturally made for nursing an infant? Gotcha. I'll mark that down so I don't forget it.

[SandyCo]

Roadkill, in your world a woman breastfeeding means that she is low class? So if I dressed modestly, never swore, never flirted with strange men, gave generously to the poor, etc. etc., yet I breast fed in public, I'd still be low class? I am grateful to not be so narrow-minded and fixated on such things. Your viewpoint seems unnecessarily rigid. The finer points of this debate have already been covered by others, so I won't repeat them. Suffice to say that I'm glad I live in California, where women who breastfeed in public are protected by law.