U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2007, 02:08 PM
 
1,428 posts, read 1,862,137 times
Reputation: 1433
Default Harvard Researchers Say "Cry It Out" is Wrong

Just thought I'd pass this information along w/key points highlighted.


Harvard Researchers Say
Children Need Touching and Attention


by Alvin Powell, Contributing Writer,
Harvard Gazette

America's "let them cry" attitude toward children may lead to more fears and
tears among adults, according to two Harvard Medical School researchers.
Instead of letting infants cry, American parents should keep their babies
close, console them when they cry, and bring them to bed with
them, where they'll feel safe,
according to Michael Commons and Patrice
Miller, researchers at the Medical School's Department of Psychiatry.

The pair examined child-rearing practices here and in other cultures and say
the widespread American practice of putting babies in separate beds - even
separate rooms - and not responding to their cries may lead to more
incidents of post-traumatic stress and panic disorders among American
adults.

The early stress due to separation causes changes in infant brains that
makes future adults more susceptible to stress in their lives, say Commons
and Miller.

"Parents should recognize that having their babies cry unnecessarily harms
the baby permanently. It changes the nervous system so they're sensitive to
future trauma,"
Commons said.

Their work is unique because it takes a cross-disciplinary approach,
examining brain function, emotional learning in infants, and cultural
differences, according to Charles R. Figley, director of the Traumatology
Institute at Florida State University and editor of The Journal of
Traumatology.

"It is very unusual but extremely important to find this kind of
interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research report," Figley said. "It
accounts for cross-cultural differences in children's emotional response and
their ability to cope with stress, including traumatic stress."

___________

Figley said their work illuminates a route of further study and could have
implications for everything from parents' efforts to intellectually
stimulate infants to painful practices such as circumcision. Commons has
been a lecturer and research associate at the Medical School's Department of
Psychiatry since 1987 and is a member of the Department's Program in
Psychiatry and the Law.

Miller has been a research associate at Harvard Medical School's Program in
Psychiatry and the Law since 1994 and an assistant professor of psychology at
Salem State College since 1993. She received master's and doctorate degrees
in education from Harvard's Graduate School of Education.

The pair say that American child-rearing practices are influenced by fears
that children will grow up dependent. But parents are on the wrong track.
Physical contact and reassurance will make children more secure when they
finally head out on their own and make them better able to form their own
adult relationships
.

"We've stressed independence so much that it's having some very negative
side effects," Miller said.

The two gained the spotlight in February when they presented their ideas at
the American Association for the Advancement of Science's annual meeting in
Philadelphia.

In a paper presented at the meeting, Commons and Miller contrasted American
child-rearing practices with those of other cultures, particularly the Gusii
tribe of Kenya. Gusii mothers sleep with their babies and respond rapidly
when the baby cries.

"Gusii mothers watching videotapes of U.S. mothers were upset by how long it
took these mothers to respond to infant crying," Commons and Miller said in
their paper on the subject.

The way we are brought up colors our entire society, Commons and Miller say.

Americans in general don't like to be touched and pride themselves on
independence to the point of isolation, even when undergoing a difficult or
stressful time.

Despite the conventional wisdom that babies should learn to be alone, Miller
said she believes many parents "cheat," keeping the baby in the room with
them, at least initially. In addition, once the child can crawl around, she
believes many find their way into their parents' room on their own.

American parents shouldn't worry about this behavior or be afraid to baby
their babies, Commons and Miller said. Parents should feel free to sleep
with their infant children, to keep their toddlers nearby, perhaps on a
mattress in the same room, and to comfort a baby when it cries.

"There are ways to grow up and be independent without putting babies through
this trauma," Commons said. "My advice is to keep the kids secure so they
can grow up and take some risks."

Besides fears of dependence, other factors have helped form our childrearing
practices, including fears that children would interfere with sex if they
shared their parents' room and doctors' concerns that a baby would be
injured by a parent rolling on it if it shared their bed, the pair said. The
nation's growing wealth has helped the trend toward separation by giving
families the means to buy larger homes with separate rooms for children.

The result, Commons and Miller said, is a nation that doesn't like caring
for its own children, a violent nation marked by loose, nonphysical
relationships.


"I think there's a real resistance in this culture to caring for children,
"Commons said. "Punishment and abandonment has never been a good way to get
warm, caring, independent people."

Reprinted with permission of Dr. Commons.
_http://www.hno.http://www.hhttp://wwwhttp://www.hhttp_ (broken link)
(http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/1...enNeedTou.html (broken link))
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2007, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Mebane
2,460 posts, read 3,825,568 times
Reputation: 1980
Thanks for the article! I guess it validates what I already do anyway! Respond to your baby's cues!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2007, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Happiness is found inside your smile :)
3,177 posts, read 9,896,046 times
Reputation: 1158
I responded to baby cues too - but I beleive in CIO when it is necessary after 6 months old.

It's called tough love
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2007, 09:36 PM
 
7,361 posts, read 7,603,411 times
Reputation: 10597
I let my daughter "cry it out" once for about 5 minutes. It was all I could stand. I also nursed her til 3 and a half and she slept with us til she was 5 and I still sleep with her occasionally, which she loves. I could never understand not giving her what she wanted when she was little--food, comfort, closeness--because it's what we all want and need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2007, 02:42 PM
 
2,109 posts, read 2,410,371 times
Reputation: 555
Wasn't it the Harvard researcher that wanted to kill the babies that were "not viable" after born...??? Maybe I'm wrong, but I think it was a Harvard researcher. I'll do some research and hope you all do, too. Frankly, because it is a Harvard "researcher"...doesn't play much with me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2007, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Eastern PA
1,134 posts, read 2,931,583 times
Reputation: 866
I like this research because it validates what I have believed all along

I also believe in extended BFing, cosleeping, responding promptly to my children's needs as a baby. I now have a 13 y/o and a 5 y/o and they are more independent than most kids their age, which I believe stems from having their needs met when they were little. When they were ready to separate from me, they did so, and very well.

I started baby-wearing like the moms in Kenya do with son #2 so I could attend to his needs more promptly yet still go about tending to DS#1 and my chores. He and his little sister cried so much less than many other babies, they were just hanging out next to me quietly alert most of the time. It seems that most babies in baby-wearing cultures are like that.

To me anyhow, it's been common sense. Infants cry, it is their one forceful means of communicating. Why would we as parents purposely ignore that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2007, 08:10 PM
 
358 posts, read 624,827 times
Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADVentive View Post
Thanks for the article! I guess it validates what I already do anyway! Respond to your baby's cues!
Absolutely. Our hearts and heads were right. Ignoring a baby's only way to communicate is teaching him that his needs are not important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 06:03 PM
 
Location: N of citrus, S of decent corn
16,237 posts, read 18,697,756 times
Reputation: 24683
A newborn needs to know its needs will be met instantly. This is how they learn to trust and be mellow. However, an older baby whose needs have all been met sometimes just needs to cry in order to wind down. Furthermore, a toddler who isn't made to fend for itself a little will quickly learn to play you like a harp.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Tuxedo Park, NY
419 posts, read 1,408,720 times
Reputation: 238
Is this "tough love" concept the same as the "Ferber" method?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2007, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Wake Forest
3,124 posts, read 8,718,265 times
Reputation: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by WallStreetWarrior View Post
Is this "tough love" concept the same as the "Ferber" method?
No...'tough love' is for children old enough to understand the concept....not infants.

Ferber is more a modified 'cry it out' where infants are responded to after a time....but increasing the amount of time before parents go to them. It is for older infants.

Personally....this research just supports what I've thought all along. CIO is not a good thing for babies.....sure, they may stop crying....but only because you've taught them they can't trust or depend on anyone.

Parents (in general, who use CIO) need to get over themselves and put their child's needs above their own for a short time. If they can't do that, they have no business being parents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 AM.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top