Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm not a fan of Spock but that's an awful lot to put on one man.
I remember the first I heard of him was when my older sister bought the book when she had her first child, I was 7. Lord I remember listening to my niece scream and scream. When my sister had her second child she threw that book away. Both her kids turned out fine, upstanding productive members of society.
Dr. Spock emphasized love, attention, and nurturing to babies and children. If that is what your parents were doing, then your childhood wouldn't have been one of abuse and dysfunction, don't you think?
For all the criticism Dr. Spock has received, who really wants to return to the days when babies weren't held because it "spoiled" them, refusal of affection to children, and cold, distant, uninvolved parenting, especially for fathers?
Edited to add: I agree with everything Wmsn4life said.
What poppycock. Reb Bradley is a nut, and trying to sell a highly controversial parenting tome. Anyone who thinks that affection "fosters self-importance in children" and thus their "homes became a hotbed for narcissism" is seriously disturbed.
I bought Dr. Spock's book when my daughter was born (or soon after). Like all books, one takes bits and pieces, and uses what is useful. There were many times just having the advice in his book saved me during those early years and it gave me confidence as a parent--particularly with medical issues, feeding, etc.
This so called article--nonsense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.