Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2015, 09:19 PM
 
3,963 posts, read 5,692,055 times
Reputation: 3711

Advertisements

As someone who has never liked or wanted children (I only saw this thread via the active thread box on the right side). That's the coolest thing I've seen in a while. It's symbolic that everyone deserves a fair start in life regardless of your income level and it speaks volumes that the majority of Finns from all income levels partake in the program. This wouldn't work in the US.

We are far too self-centered, paranoid and concerned with status to actually consider this. "Put my baby in a box?" "Why I never!" Also too many individual Americans would rather watch someone grovel than think of the whole and they try to disguise their view by using the tax excuse (the US could easily afford a similar program even in our current tax situation if we didn't spend so much money on World Police BS) or by saying it encourages more pregnancies. Yes because a baby box is going to make more people partake in unprotected sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-09-2015, 10:38 PM
 
2,441 posts, read 2,605,814 times
Reputation: 4644
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarletG View Post
And what could be saved later in medical bills and children that have preventable issuesis well worth the cost along.

Some would rather cut off their nose to spite their face than help some one that needs it.
Welcome to America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 12:05 AM
 
Location: Finland
6,417 posts, read 7,242,599 times
Reputation: 10435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattie View Post
I understand completely how and why it works, which is because Finland leans towards a socialist society when it comes to public policy.

Teens sometimes have babies so that somebody loves them. A box full of freebies would just make it all that more attractive to a girl getting pregnant for the wrong reasons.

If you have the answers as to how why this should be done in the US, I urge you to run for public office and put it on your platform. I leave this thread, knowing it never will, could, or should happen here.
If that was the case you'd expect to see higher levels of teen pregnancy here in Finland, but there isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 04:56 AM
 
13,395 posts, read 13,493,430 times
Reputation: 35712
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScarletG View Post
You don't know much about rural living and just how fair away services can be when you don't own a car...even if you live in a small town and can get to a store. I have a friend that lives in rural Kansas...the have a Dollar General in their very small town.... the county seat is 50 miles.....the nearest grocery 25. They have one car for a family of 4 and that's needed so the hubby can go to work. It's hard finding someone to give you a lift 50 miles one way on a regular basis. There are no buses. There are no free clinics.

You can't compare being a "big city girl" to being born and raised in a rural environment.

.
People live in rural environments by choice. They are 100% aware of the sparseness of local services--whether it's retail shopping, food, schools, entertainment, etc. Yes, even available medical services. Yet, they still choose to live there.

They know that treating any medical condition (say a broken leg) will be difficult because of where they live. Why would they expect the world to suddenly be different because that medical condition is a pregnancy?

In the example given, why hasn't the family purchased a second car to be used for the wife? Even a cheap little car won't cost that much.

Just because someone intentionally lives somewhere far from the normally available services, it doesn't mean those services haven't been made available in a proper chosen location.

Are we saying that social service agencies have to set up shop every 2 miles because some people choose to live in the boonies?

FYI. I lived in Kansas and that entire area for over 5 years at one point in my life. Then I moved back to the city because I wanted more access to basic life services.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 06:23 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,352,246 times
Reputation: 22904
While I think the baby box is very cool, I'd like to know exactly why Finland's infant mortality rate was so high in the 1930s. Off to Google.

Update: What I found was that in 1936, one in ten Finnish children died before reaching the age of one. Forty of the infant mortality rate at that time was attributable to birth trauma, developmental defect, or innate weakness. Pneumonia, disease, and violence accounted for the additional deaths.

Last edited by randomparent; 06-10-2015 at 06:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Finland
6,417 posts, read 7,242,599 times
Reputation: 10435
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomparent View Post
While I think the baby box is very cool, I'd like to know exactly why Finland's infant mortality rate was so high in 1938. Off to Google.
Statistics Finland - 6. Infant mortality in 1936 to 2010

Edit: You were quicker than me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 06:47 AM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,352,246 times
Reputation: 22904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natsku View Post
You were quick! That's what I found, too. Thanks for posting the link. Apple's current version of iOS isn't playing nicely with C-D and crashes whenever I try to create a link, which is seriously frustrating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 07:23 AM
 
733 posts, read 852,614 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazee Cat Lady View Post
Fascinating article, and a really great ideal! In the US we have approximately twice the infant Mortality rate that Finland does....Just imagine if we gave this a try!



Finland is really good at keeping babies alive. Here's one reason why.
Used to give those out in Britain.

"Call the Midwife" shows it in action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Fairfield of the Ohio
774 posts, read 744,043 times
Reputation: 2425
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildColonialGirl View Post
Welcome to America.

I think the box is fabulous. Let every tax-paying person or family have one. Non-contributors should get vouchers for abortions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2015, 12:18 PM
 
1,955 posts, read 1,757,583 times
Reputation: 5179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
I'd be willing to pay more taxes for the following:

Single payer health insurance
Free postsecondary education
Maternal/Paternal Family leave
Better infrastructure
Hiring more teachers and doctors


Oh and baby boxes
I think what you might be thinking is that you want to pay a small amount of extra taxes, and get a lot more freebee benefits. But try and think about the real, actual cost of these things, per person?

Average cost of Healthcare for a single person over their lifetime $316,579 (source: NIH)
Average cost of Post Secondary Education per person $34,483 (source: Dept of Edu)
Average cost of 3 months salary per person (family leave) $12,625 (source: Google)
For now we will just leave out infrastructure, teachers, and doctors.

Now add that all together, and divide by 40 for number of working years (assuming everyone works 40 years) and you get a cost of $9,092 per person, per year. That's actual costs, not counting the bureaucracy to manage these things for the entire nation. That's the minimum of how much extra taxes you'd have to pay.

Except this country does not require about 50% of it's population to pay federal income taxes. So that number you calculated above? Double it, so you can pay for one other person's share.

So the first 3 items on your list alone will require for YOU to pay an EXTRA $18,184 in taxes, a year, over what you already pay. Double it for your family if you have a spouse. That's $36,368 of extra taxes, a year, for the average two-parent family.

Are you sure you want to pay THAT much extra taxes?

(And in case you were thinking just let the corporations and 1% pay it, it doesn't matter how rich they are, they would not able to absorb anywhere close to this kind of increase in taxes.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top