Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-16-2016, 04:36 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,333,568 times
Reputation: 10644

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by glass_of_merlot View Post
I am paranoid just because I don't want my neighbor filming my kids and put it on his FB page?
Absolutely. If you are fearful of your kid being filmed in public, you are most definitely paranoid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2016, 04:38 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,333,568 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
No.

Nothing like advertising your child to child molesters.
You better not let your kids ever leave the house, then.

Because every time they leave the house, according to you, they are being "advertised to child molesters". What a miserable mindset.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Hospitality View Post
What a waste of time. The OP can threaten all she wants... but that's as far as it can go. The neighbor didn't break any laws. This kind of action will only make the OP be the "idiot neighbor".
Legally, he needs a signed release to air the video.

Since she is a minor, the parents would have to sign the release for her.


Children's Internet Protection Act

https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides...protection-act


Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule ("COPPA")

Tags:


16 CFR Part 312
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. 6501–6505 (link is external)
Children's Privacy

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rule...rotection-rule



Those are just two of many federal laws.

States have their own laws, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 04:54 PM
 
7,990 posts, read 5,384,679 times
Reputation: 35563
Quote:
Originally Posted by MamaBear999 View Post
Am I over-reacting?
I would have been upset. I am happy my kids grew up without social media.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:00 PM
 
Location: So Cal
19,423 posts, read 15,236,300 times
Reputation: 20377
I wouldn't pitch a fit over it, but if I were on FB, I would never post something like that without asking the parents' permission first. Times have changed, and this is one of the points of etiquette that have arisen because of it, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:00 PM
 
10,275 posts, read 10,333,568 times
Reputation: 10644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Legally, he needs a signed release to air the video.

Since she is a minor, the parents would have to sign the release for her.
No, they don't. Are people really this crazy?

The acts you refer to are for schools and libraries only. You really think it's illegal for someone to photograph or film people in public? Every single person on earth with a smartphone should be imprisoned according to you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
States have their own laws, too.
No, they don't. Show us these laws that prevent children in public from being viewed, photographed, or recorded.

Hide your kid in the basement, already, and never invite a human into your house, or you are encouraging pedophiles, according to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:04 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,132,345 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Legally, he needs a signed release to air the video.

Since she is a minor, the parents would have to sign the release for her.


Children's Internet Protection Act

https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides...protection-act


Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule ("COPPA")

Tags:


16 CFR Part 312
Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. 6501–6505 (link is external)
Children's Privacy

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/rule...rotection-rule



Those are just two of many federal laws.

States have their own laws, too.
None of which apply here. I suggest that you actually read the links that you post and familiarize yourself with U.S. laws if you're going to continue to live here. Laws may be different where you are from, but only U.S. laws apply here.

Btw, in the U.S. a parental release is only required when using the video for commercial purposes.

Stop pretending to know the law and making this a legal issue. As many have mentioned, there is no legal issue here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:05 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,132,345 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
No, they don't. Are people really this crazy?
They aren't crazy. Quite coherent, actually. They are just ignorant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:11 PM
 
3,279 posts, read 5,317,030 times
Reputation: 6149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Legally, he needs a signed release to air the video.

Children's Internet Protection Act

https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides...protection-act

{snip}

Those are just two of many federal laws.

States have their own laws, too.
It only took me a few minutes of reading to see these law apply to schools and libraries filtering content or (in the reading I did) videotaping them at school, it has NOTHING to do with this sort of thing.

States have tried different things, and when they have in my observation it ends up being squashed due to flunking constitutionality. In TX here we had an "Improper Photography" law which basically said no taking photos of scantily clad women (bikinis at lake, cheerleaders etc), which I never did anyway. It was struck down as being unconstitutional due to that in public you have no right to the expectation of privacy. After all, if a woman didn't want any stares, why would she choose to wear basically her underwear IN PUBLIC? You can't do that and then complain when people stare. Upskirts, now that's different because you're trying to "loophole" around clothing, but when a woman's frontal area is in your photos and she CHOOSE to parade around basically in her underwear, and you're showing that? Fair game all the way.

Again, until a LAWYER tells me that now one is required to get a parent's permission to photograph a child in public, I don't believe it. Moreover, if such laws get passed, they'll likely end up being struck down the way Texas' law was.

Someone said "times have changed." How? Did perverts and molesters magically appear in the past 5-10 years when they had never existed before in the entire history of the world? Really? Tell me how "times have changed," and why I should consider MY photography a "by invitation only" matter from now on?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2016, 05:17 PM
 
16,235 posts, read 25,209,320 times
Reputation: 27047
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Absolutely. If you are fearful of your kid being filmed in public, you are most definitely paranoid.
This was at the guys house....creepy neighbor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top