Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2011, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Stephenville, Texas
1,073 posts, read 1,796,272 times
Reputation: 2259

Advertisements

Every time I've left a company they have given information on what to do to rollover my 401k, so I guess I'm a little surprised at the post. IMO, the worst thing to do would be cash the 401k out, if you are not close to retirement. I've rolled 2 past 401k's into my current one with no problems. They were all with Fidelity, but that shouldn't really matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2011, 05:34 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,138,905 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracySam View Post
I've noticed a few commercials on the radio and TV lately targeted to people having 401(k)s left over from jobs they've left years ago, and they haven't done anything with them. I'm trying to understand why anyone would be in this situation.

When you leave a job, you don't know if that company is going to exist in the future, so I'd think you would quickly put your 401(k) funds into an IRA or your new 401(k) ASAP, right?

I know that in most jobs you can't participate in the 401(k) until you are there a year, so the longest an old 401(k) should be sitting there is one year, then you should be dumping it into your new plan. But people seem to have 401(k)s sitting around from jobs they've left years & years ago. I just don't get it. What is the benefit of doing this? I'm not a financial expert, and am hoping some of the "gurus" here can enlighten me.

Companies close down or get taken over all the time. If you decide like 8 or 10 years later that you want to get to your old 401(k) how do your know that HR department that helped you years ago will still be around to help you? I was fortunate that after one year at my current job, my old HR person was still at my old company and helped me with my rollover into my new 401(k).

I'm sure all these people aren't just being irresponsible; they must have some reason for letting the old 401(k)s sit there, right?

Please explain to this non-financial person.
First of all, the company doesn't have access to your 401(k) fund. They make payments into a trust and then it's out of their hands -- literally. The only way they have access to your 401(k) funds is if they didn't make the payments to the trust in the first place, which is flat-out criminal. But once they do make the payments into the trust, it doesn't matter what happens to the company -- what matters is what happens to the trust. Moving it from one trust to another doesn't make your 401(k) balance any more secure unless you have reason to believe the prior trust was being mismanaged.

Second, I have money left in a 401(k) fund from a previous employer because it has a much better selection of investment options. At my current employer, I have 3 options. At my previous employer, I have at least 10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2011, 06:21 AM
 
106,576 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
one of our human flaws is its not what we know that gets us in trouble, its what we know that aint so, that does:

most of you are looking at this from what you know and not from what you dont know as far as the internal workings in most states.

heres why you shouldnt leave it:

i lived through a former company who went under while my 401k was with that company and this was while i was still there..

heres the problem you run in to when a company goes out of business. . the 401k plan is basically closed down and frozen by the custodian until its allowed to distribute the money . the money has to be moved. you cant have a 401k with no company behind it. your free to take it and roll it over or pay the taxes and penaltys if any and spend it.


that creates a problem for everyone because of the married and divorced folks in the plan..

there is a period of a few months where paper work has to be signed by spouses and ex spouses who are entitled to money making them aware you will be moving the money or taking it..

since not every former employee in the company can be easily gotten a hold of it takes lots time to go through the process. notices in papers have to run ,investagors used to track down people and every last attempt has to be made to get answers and the affidavitt back.

it took 3-4 months of no access to our money to run the process.

you can not make portfolio changes either as everything is frozen.. the markets may be crashing around you and you can make no changes. you cant buy and you cant sell.

if your ready to retire at least if you work for the company you know what kind of shape its in most likely. you can make other plans for money to live on for a few months if you have to or you can retire a little early before thay lock the plan if the company fails or just closes...

when you are not with your old company you may not have a clue as to their financial health. .

so to avoid loosing the ability to change investments or to not be able to draw income with your old plan save yourself some grief and take it with you.

Last edited by mathjak107; 05-15-2011 at 06:55 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2011, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
5,327 posts, read 6,012,751 times
Reputation: 10948
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
one of our human flaws is its not what we know that gets us in trouble, its what we know that aint so, that does: <snip>
I'll have to remember this quote! Similar to, but not the same, as "A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.

As an aside, I left my 403b and 457b funds with the State and left my tiny TSP with the Fed. When I left the State, I could withdraw the funds without penalty, if needed. Not as easy with the IRAs (yes, I know you can set up a 72T plan) Most of my money is in my IRAs. I like it this way, although I may move a portion of my IRAs to a different investment firm for additional protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2011, 05:52 AM
 
106,576 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
one thing about the financial world. they never run out of good sayings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 10:07 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,443,387 times
Reputation: 9074
I've never had a job where a 401(k) was available, so I'll guess that it's easier to let it sit than to get it to roll over.bbbb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2011, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Lake Norman, NC
8,876 posts, read 13,907,158 times
Reputation: 35986
I have a new co-worker who is trying her best to get a payout of her 401K from her previous employer so she can roll it over to our current 401K plan.

However, the fine folks at Fidelity are doing their best to put up as many obstacles as possible. They gave me a hard time 5 years ago when I rolled my 401K from a previous employer. I'm not surprised to see they're still up to the same hijinks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 02:50 AM
 
106,576 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
i would like to know the obstacles they put?

i had fidelity do my rollevers 2x. they went just fine. any delays were on the old custodians side.

fidelity only sends a letter requesting a check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 02:57 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,138,905 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
i would like to know the obstacles they put?

i had fidelity do my rollevers 2x. they went just fine. any delays were on the old custodians side.

fidelity only sends a letter requesting a check.
I gather what he's saying is that in his case Fidelity is the old custodion causing delays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2011, 03:22 AM
 
106,576 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80058
you could be right.... old custodians are never happy to give up money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top