Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2011, 02:57 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas
782 posts, read 1,109,101 times
Reputation: 3173

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
It's a value-added service and an expense to them whether or not they are forced to do it.
It's not a value added service..it's a requirement. A value added service implies there was a choice involved. The expense is a cost of doing business..and is tax deductable BTW.

Yep, that's what you willingly do. You could just put your money in a mattress if you like.
It's funny that you should say that..the banks are basically doing just that..they aren't making near as many loans as they did before the crash..and they have tightened the qualifications for obtaining a loan that it is nearly impossible.

I don't know about BofA but most banks clearly detail their intentions in the fine print.
Yes, fine print...we all know what that is. And, as you have stated, you don't know about BoA.

Your stating your opinion... but the fact remains that Bank of America needs money, whether its your or someone elses: http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_...ts/2010_AR.pdf
Well then maybe the CEO's need to take a pay cut. Maybe they need to come down from their ivory tower and live amongst the real people. I literally have NO sympathy. After the settlement I am gone from BoA and that is the ONLY reason I am not gone now. And before you have a chance to say it I don't care if it's 0.53 cents...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Sverige och USA
702 posts, read 3,010,615 times
Reputation: 419
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdelena View Post
Everyone has the federal government to thank for this. The provision in the Dodd-Frank bill introduced by Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.) lowered swipe fees to the point the banks claim to be losing on every use. The only real winner is the high volume retailers (Wal Mart etc.) so this is more of an issue with stupid (and maybe corrupt) government action.
Geez, let's be fair... if I recall the same bill also prevented the credit cards from gouging their customers with ridiculously high interest rate, which for those customers will probably save more than $5 a month.

This is a lot of hype about nothing. One has other options, pay by credit card or switch banks. Over time, competition will even the playing field.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:24 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,141,698 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
Geez, let's be fair... if I recall the same bill also prevented the credit cards from gouging their customers with ridiculously high interest rate, which for those customers will probably save more than $5 a month.

This is a lot of hype about nothing. One has other options, pay by credit card or switch banks. Over time, competition will even the playing field.
It really says a lot about how we pass bills in this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:33 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,975,811 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
It really says a lot about how we pass bills in this country.
It does.

Rather than going back and rearranging some punctuation, adding or subtracting a paragraph or two...
and by that relatively simple means making the change in the old law that are needed...
an entirely new bill can be created to which all manner of other business can be attached.

And if all that just clutters up the intent of changing the old law?
Well, that's OK too... after all it gives work to lawyers and Courts to sort out later. Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:39 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,141,698 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
It does.

Rather than going back and rearranging some punctuation, adding or subtracting a paragraph or two...
and by that relatively simple means making the change in the old law that are needed...
an entirely new bill can be created to which all manner of other business can be attached.

And if all that just clutters up the intent of changing the old law?
Well, that's OK too... after all it gives work to lawyers and Courts to sort out later. Right?
We're on the same page, my friend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Near a river
16,042 posts, read 21,971,957 times
Reputation: 15773
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
what does that even mean? they are providing a service and charging a fee for it. i dont see the significance of the question "who is providing the greater service." i would also argue that one of our jobs is to maximize our assets. the two are not mutually exclusive.
What would the banks do without all that deposited money? My banks hold a fortune of mine. Am I charging them a fee for the ability to use my money?

(just playing devil's advocate, btw--I don't personally care one way or another what they charge)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:55 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,090 posts, read 82,975,811 times
Reputation: 43666
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
What would the banks do without all that deposited money?
All what deposited money?
The banks aren't charging these nickle and dime fees to people with even modest deposits.
This is just for the people who *think* they have assets.

Quote:
My banks hold a fortune of mine.*
Am I charging them a fee for the ability to use my money?
Yes; you are. But like the debit card transaction costs (until now) it isn't a line item on the statement.

Even if real interest were also being paid (ha!)...
what other value do you receive from that relationship with the bank?
---

*ps: If they're holding more than six months worth of your living expenses...
you should probably look into another place to park that pile.

Last edited by MrRational; 09-30-2011 at 04:21 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Apple Valley Calif
7,474 posts, read 22,882,304 times
Reputation: 5682
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
What would the banks do without all that deposited money? My banks hold a fortune of mine. Am I charging them a fee for the ability to use my money?

(just playing devil's advocate, btw--I don't personally care one way or another what they charge)
If your bank holds a fortune of your money, you will not be charged a fee...!
It's only charged to people who have basic accounts, the ones the banks lose money on. If you do enough business with the bank that you aren't costing them money, they won't charge any fees. Pretty simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 04:27 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,672,505 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donn2390 View Post
If your bank holds a fortune of your money, you will not be charged a fee...!
It's only charged to people who have basic accounts, the ones the banks lose money on. If you do enough business with the bank that you aren't costing them money, they won't charge any fees. Pretty simple.
Yes, but it does get old having to go in and speak with the manager to getfees reversed...

One would think in the computer age it could be down with a software notification.

The bar keeps getting higher...

At one being 65 was all that was required...

Then it was direct deposit...

Later it was a minimum balance...

Lately, it is you must have a Debit Card... (Don't have to use it... yet)

I'm sure I have given more thought to my banking relationships than my parents or grandparents have in their lifetimes.

Last edited by Ultrarunner; 09-30-2011 at 11:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2011, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,462,106 times
Reputation: 1200
Bank of America debit fee is only the latest - Yahoo! Finance

Some banks are trying to take advantage of that impulse. The regulation doesn't apply to banks with $10 billion or less in assets, which may give some community banks and credit unions an edge.




This is something to look into!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top