Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-30-2018, 01:49 PM
 
Location: The analog world
17,077 posts, read 13,366,942 times
Reputation: 22904

Advertisements

At one time, this was a much easier task, but today people of varying levels of education and business interests can have extraordinary assets. The guy with the shaggy beard and tattered coat sitting at the next table at the coffee shop could be a Bitcoin millionaire for all I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2018, 12:11 AM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
32,936 posts, read 36,359,395 times
Reputation: 43784
Quote:
Originally Posted by randomparent View Post
At one time, this was a much easier task, but today people of varying levels of education and business interests can have extraordinary assets. The guy with the shaggy beard and tattered coat sitting at the next table at the coffee shop could be a Bitcoin millionaire for all I know.
My son said that if he won big on the lottery, he'd buy a newer pick up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2018, 12:18 AM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by PamelaIamela View Post
Sighh. Review their tax returns.

GEEZUZ. This is a five year old thread started by a two-year old.
^^5 year old thread but people still don't understand the difference between high income and rich. Tax returns look only at income, not wealth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2018, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Southlake. Don't judge me.
2,885 posts, read 4,646,325 times
Reputation: 3781
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
^^5 year old thread but people still don't understand the difference between high income and rich. Tax returns look only at income, not wealth.
Also defining "rich". Most people probably drive through a random nice suburb or neighborhood of whatever metro area they live in and say "the rich people live here", meaning various higher level professionals who earn, say, several hundred thousand a year, and who (let's assume on average, although there will always be a few who live beyond their means) have net worths in the low seven figures.

But those people might say "oh, we're doing well but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are [SVP's at companies and senior partners at large law or accounting/consulting firms], who make [800K to 2M per year, with proportionately higher net worths. Assume that latter for all of these.]. They're RICH!"

And those partners and such will go "sure, we're making a great living, but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are the investment bankers and EVPs [and CEOs of small to mid-size companies] who make [upper 7 figures to low 8 figures per year]. Now those people are RICH!"

and THOSE people will say "well, maybe we're kinda rich, but the REAL wealth, you're talking [Hedge fund managers and CEOs of certain very large companies, who make 9 figures a year]. Now that's who's really, truly RICH!"

And the hedge fund managers and CEOs will probably point to Bezos and Gates and Zuckerberg and Buffett and whoever else as they real, true Movers and Shakers. Or something.

I'll also reiterate that if you ask anyone "how much income would you need to be financially secure/comfortable", their answer will virtually always be 30-50% more than they're making currently (whether that's $20,000 or $200,000).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2018, 12:25 AM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by synchronicity View Post
Also defining "rich". Most people probably drive through a random nice suburb or neighborhood of whatever metro area they live in and say "the rich people live here", meaning various higher level professionals who earn, say, several hundred thousand a year, and who (let's assume on average, although there will always be a few who live beyond their means) have net worths in the low seven figures.

But those people might say "oh, we're doing well but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are [SVP's at companies and senior partners at large law or accounting/consulting firms], who make [800K to 2M per year, with proportionately higher net worths. Assume that latter for all of these.]. They're RICH!"

And those partners and such will go "sure, we're making a great living, but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are the investment bankers and EVPs [and CEOs of small to mid-size companies] who make [upper 7 figures to low 8 figures per year]. Now those people are RICH!"

and THOSE people will say "well, maybe we're kinda rich, but the REAL wealth, you're talking [Hedge fund managers and CEOs of certain very large companies, who make 9 figures a year]. Now that's who's really, truly RICH!"

And the hedge fund managers and CEOs will probably point to Bezos and Gates and Zuckerberg and Buffett and whoever else as they real, true Movers and Shakers. Or something.

I'll also reiterate that if you ask anyone "how much income would you need to be financially secure/comfortable", their answer will virtually always be 30-50% more than they're making currently (whether that's $20,000 or $200,000).
Yes. Very well said. I think another poster said the same thing in that we almost always "compare up" but not down.

Oh, and by the way, I've read that most people think all their financial problems would be solved if their incomes were 20% higher (not even 30% to 50% that you mention) than what they currently earn. But the thing is, everyone thinks that very same thing no matter what income level they're at.

Last edited by mysticaltyger; 04-01-2018 at 12:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2018, 01:02 AM
 
Location: Honolulu
518 posts, read 764,156 times
Reputation: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by fzx View Post
Any summary? the tread is way too long to read.
You can't tell how rich someone is by their outward appearance/lifestyle.

Rich doesn't just mean annual income.

There are different levels of rich in the USA and in the world.


Quote:
Originally Posted by synchronicity View Post
Also defining "rich". Most people probably drive through a random nice suburb or neighborhood of whatever metro area they live in and say "the rich people live here", meaning various higher level professionals who earn, say, several hundred thousand a year, and who (let's assume on average, although there will always be a few who live beyond their means) have net worths in the low seven figures.

But those people might say "oh, we're doing well but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are [SVP's at companies and senior partners at large law or accounting/consulting firms], who make [800K to 2M per year, with proportionately higher net worths. Assume that latter for all of these.]. They're RICH!"

And those partners and such will go "sure, we're making a great living, but we're not *RICH*. The rich people are the investment bankers and EVPs [and CEOs of small to mid-size companies] who make [upper 7 figures to low 8 figures per year]. Now those people are RICH!"

and THOSE people will say "well, maybe we're kinda rich, but the REAL wealth, you're talking [Hedge fund managers and CEOs of certain very large companies, who make 9 figures a year]. Now that's who's really, truly RICH!"

And the hedge fund managers and CEOs will probably point to Bezos and Gates and Zuckerberg and Buffett and whoever else as they real, true Movers and Shakers. Or something.

I'll also reiterate that if you ask anyone "how much income would you need to be financially secure/comfortable", their answer will virtually always be 30-50% more than they're making currently (whether that's $20,000 or $200,000).
At some point in this ladder, (maybe 2nd or 3rd to the last rung) I think many will stop defining people simply by their wealth (with likely exception of the top echelon like Gates/Buffett/Bezos/etc. and the many billionaires whose names we dont' even recognize as household) but by their life accomplishments and positions of power/influence/ Ie, high level politicians, scientific greats, nobel laureats, well-known artists (including musicians and performance art), well-known people with fame/notoriety for charitable/great work and true passion for certain causes.

If you're a top C-level executive of a large company clearing high 7 figure to 8 figures a year and potentially worth 50-100M++, I'm not sure if you're THAT impressed by more wealth as much as figures/peoples who are truly achieved/did alot with themselves in science/politics/music/humanitarian-work/etc. and not just because they made a boat load of money.

It's certainly very very difficult to sit shoulder to shoulder with wealth that has names such as Gates/Buffett/Bezos....but to be recognized in history to be true shakers/movers with names such as:
Einstein, Armstrong (astronaut and musician). Gandhi, Fleming, Mandela, MLK Jr, Elvis, Picasso, Freud, Speilberg, Sinatra, etc. etc. these, imo, are MUCH harder to achieve than making lots and lots of money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2018, 01:17 AM
 
1,355 posts, read 1,945,860 times
Reputation: 904
CarFax report shows 1 owner vehicle without "Loan/lien reported" mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2018, 06:15 AM
 
31,683 posts, read 41,040,852 times
Reputation: 14434
Quote:
Originally Posted by cokeman View Post
i think it goes like this.
-they have nice teeth. poor's can't afford dentist.
- they drive a Mercedes-Benz.
- they have nice clothes such as Gucci and Ralph Lauren etc.

Anything else im missing?
Two and three don’t equal wealth they are more indicative of spending. Which could result in the absence of wealth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Keosauqua, Iowa
9,614 posts, read 21,270,240 times
Reputation: 13670
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuborgP View Post
Two and three don’t equal wealth they are more indicative of spending. Which could result in the absence of wealth.
Why not all three? Most dentists take credit cards these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2018, 06:20 AM
 
Location: Columbia SC
14,249 posts, read 14,737,232 times
Reputation: 22189
It is all in ones definition. While I am comfortable my girl friend, single mother of two and does not have two nickels to rub together, thinks I am wealthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top