Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-09-2013, 04:41 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,455,098 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

...call them A and B. A buys the duplex with closing 60 days in the future. A rents out the other unit to B, and both move in the day of the closing.

Thirty years later, A throws a party to celebrate paying off his mortgage, and A and B compare notes. B's total costs exceeded A's total costs, meaning that A lived in the duplex for free, and B paid for it.

Did B get a good deal? What would you say to B?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2013, 06:50 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,964,986 times
Reputation: 43661
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
A (manages his skills, income and resources for X years and then) buys the duplex...
A rents out the other unit to B (who then remains with no apparent change or growth in his life)

Thirty years later... Owner and Tenant compare notes.
Did B get (value for his outlay)?
Doubtless.
Even if/when the rent continued to rise on par with the market over those 30 years.
Quote:
What would you say to B?
If you're stable enough enough to stay put and pay $X regularly...
it's rather silly not to buy rather than to rent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 08:13 AM
 
17,302 posts, read 22,039,209 times
Reputation: 29643
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
...call them A and B. A buys the duplex with closing 60 days in the future. A rents out the other unit to B, and both move in the day of the closing.

Thirty years later, A throws a party to celebrate paying off his mortgage, and A and B compare notes. B's total costs exceeded A's total costs, meaning that A lived in the duplex for free, and B paid for it.

Did B get a good deal? What would you say to B?
Tell B the rent is going up 5% next year?

In a low interest market this could happen:

1. 150K loan on a duplex that is 2/2 on both sides (850 sq ft each side, rents for $850 a month)
2. 150K/30 years at 4% is $716 a month. So if the tenant B pays $850 a month he covers the whole mortgage and the landlord (A) is on the hook for the taxes/insurance/maintenance minus the $135 excess he clears with the tenants rent money after paying the mortgage. Figure 2k in taxes/2k insurance in a Florida market. $4800-$1620 ($135 X 12)= $3180 annual net cost for the owner ($265 a month). So owner pays about 31% of what it costs the renter in this scenario.

Double the interest rate to 8% and it seems like more of a struggle to break even if the rent stays the same (mtg payment jumps to $1100).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 08:22 AM
 
5,730 posts, read 10,126,656 times
Reputation: 8052
I'd say he should of learned some skill other than burger flipping in 30 years, and should of applied himself more!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 08:27 AM
 
17,302 posts, read 22,039,209 times
Reputation: 29643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Themanwithnoname View Post
I'd say he should of learned some skill other than burger flipping in 30 years, and should of applied himself more!

On a more serious note, I would like to see the responses from the "I rent because I don't want the headache of owning" crowd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 08:54 AM
 
23,596 posts, read 70,402,242 times
Reputation: 49242
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
...call them A and B. A buys the duplex with closing 60 days in the future. A rents out the other unit to B, and both move in the day of the closing.

Thirty years later, A throws a party to celebrate paying off his mortgage, and A and B compare notes. B's total costs exceeded A's total costs, meaning that A lived in the duplex for free, and B paid for it.

Did B get a good deal? What would you say to B?
I would say that someone is fudging the math. No way would B's total cost exceed those of A, and no way would A have been living for free. Did you go to the Ayn Rand school of economics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 09:10 AM
 
1,858 posts, read 3,103,840 times
Reputation: 4238
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post
I would say that someone is fudging the math. No way would B's total cost exceed those of A, and no way would A have been living for free. Did you go to the Ayn Rand school of economics?
Explain why this is impossible? Maybe "A" didn't live for free, but his expenses could be considerably less. Let's say that the rent is 60-70% of the mortgage. "A" is only contributing 30%. With rent increases over the 30 year period, "B" could end up paying the entire mortgage by the end. "A" also get's to deduct the taxes and interest that "B" is paying for him... as well as other expenses. As long as "A" got a god deal upfront (that's where the money is made) this is very feasible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 09:38 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,964,986 times
Reputation: 43661
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmills View Post
Explain why this is impossible?
shh! never expand the topic on one Free's posts.

If you're curious about something (like your Q) explore that elsewhere
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 10:20 AM
 
1,614 posts, read 2,071,798 times
Reputation: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by harry chickpea View Post
I would say that someone is fudging the math. No way would B's total cost exceed those of A, and no way would A have been living for free. Did you go to the Ayn Rand school of economics?
It would be unlikely, but possible. If A bought when the market bottomed out, and raised rent accordingly over the years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-09-2013, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Beachwood, OH
1,135 posts, read 1,835,807 times
Reputation: 987
If you also include home value appreciation, I don't think it's even that unlikely. Obviously depends on original home price and interest rate, rent and rent increases, etc. but it could happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top