Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2014, 01:04 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,425,985 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

22
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2014, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Manhattan, NYC
2 posts, read 2,013 times
Reputation: 10
6.
But that's because I live in Manhattan, which is super expensive.
If I had to live off my savings (net worth), I'd move somewhere a LOT cheaper. Like Thailand or Costa Rica.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 01:45 PM
 
2,294 posts, read 2,778,568 times
Reputation: 3852
I think this is slightly skewed if you're including home equity in terms of your net worth. Realistically if you had to sell to liquidate you're equity, it would give you cash, but increase your expenses.

That said, I think I'm around 6 as well. That's the downside to a higher cost of living place. Additionally, if I had even the slightest hint that my employment was even remotely at risk, I can easily scale back on things a bit to get to 10. I just choose to eat out a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 01:50 PM
 
Location: NJ
31,771 posts, read 40,669,041 times
Reputation: 24590
im not sure what the value of this number is. id imagine the closer you are to retirement, the higher the number should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 01:55 PM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,565,123 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeo123 View Post
I think this is slightly skewed if you're including home equity in terms of your net worth. Realistically if you had to sell to liquidate you're equity, it would give you cash, but increase your expenses.

That said, I think I'm around 6 as well. That's the downside to a higher cost of living place. Additionally, if I had even the slightest hint that my employment was even remotely at risk, I can easily scale back on things a bit to get to 10. I just choose to eat out a bit.
Either your net worth is very low or you eat out a ton lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2014, 02:08 PM
 
2,294 posts, read 2,778,568 times
Reputation: 3852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Either your net worth is very low or you eat out a ton lol
Actually it's my overall "Entertainment" category which also includes things like the fact that I've had a lot of weddings this year. Those things quickly get expensive. Just goes to prove that while interesting, this number is very easily skewed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2014, 06:21 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
2,395 posts, read 3,009,759 times
Reputation: 2934
>25
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2014, 11:54 AM
 
18,547 posts, read 15,570,971 times
Reputation: 16225
Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
E.g. if you have a networth of $300,000 and spend $30,000 per year...

It is 10.

Meaning, if all that money was sitting in cash, you could theoretically survive for 10 years before it runs out.


For me it is 7.

$100,000 networth and $14,000 spending per year.
I think it's a bit less than 2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 12:09 AM
 
30,891 posts, read 36,934,424 times
Reputation: 34511
Quote:
Originally Posted by peskypesky View Post
6.
But that's because I live in Manhattan, which is super expensive.
If I had to live off my savings (net worth), I'd move somewhere a LOT cheaper. Like Thailand or Costa Rica.
Yes, I'm approaching the point where I could do something similar, although it would still be tight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 12:11 AM
 
30,891 posts, read 36,934,424 times
Reputation: 34511
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainNJ View Post
im not sure what the value of this number is. id imagine the closer you are to retirement, the higher the number should be.
Generally, if you don't have a pension or Social Security coming in, the number should be ~25, not including your house.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top