Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2018, 05:20 PM
 
31,904 posts, read 26,961,756 times
Reputation: 24814

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
I've known a few who live that way, don't pay taxes. If they live long enough they are in for a big shock, since if you didn't pay Social Security tax, you won't collect Social Security.

A whole lot of people are going to be in a world of hurt who are "self-employed" or whatever but have been doing so mostly off the books.


In particular those who say for a good part of their working lives were employed, then were fired or whatever and began working for themselves to earn money.


Few realize and or even understand just how SS bennies are calculated. In short is basically is an average and for any years without reported income you get a big fat *ZERO*. Any grade school kid can (or should) be able to tell you what adding zeros does to an average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2018, 05:25 PM
 
Location: SoCal
14,530 posts, read 20,118,288 times
Reputation: 10539
IIRC your Social Security is calculated on the average of your best 40 quarterly income. If your income is not reported then you get nada.

For the record, I think it's just plain stupid to not follow the law. I think people who hide their income or don't use banks are nutters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2018, 05:49 PM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143
social security benefits are calculated off your 35 highest years not 40 quarters .. you need 40 credits to be eligible for ss .

How are Benefits Calculated?
First, a worker’s previous earnings are restated in terms of today’s wages to reflect wage growth.
Second, earnings for the highest 35 years are averaged and divided by the number of months in 35 years to arrive at Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME).
Third, the Social Security benefit formula is applied to AIME to produce the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA), the benefit payable at Full Retirement Age (FRA).

Anyone born in 1929 or later needs 10 years of work (40 credits) to be eligible for retirement benefits. People born before 1929 need fewer years of work


https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10072.pdf

Last edited by mathjak107; 10-15-2018 at 06:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2018, 05:59 PM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
A whole lot of people are going to be in a world of hurt who are "self-employed" or whatever but have been doing so mostly off the books.


In particular those who say for a good part of their working lives were employed, then were fired or whatever and began working for themselves to earn money.


Few realize and or even understand just how SS bennies are calculated. In short is basically is an average and for any years without reported income you get a big fat *ZERO*. Any grade school kid can (or should) be able to tell you what adding zeros does to an average.
if i could have invested all the money i paid in taxes and in to ss over the years by hiding income i could have the equal to multiple ss checks coming in from that money .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2018, 06:21 PM
 
31,904 posts, read 26,961,756 times
Reputation: 24814
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
social security benefits are calculated off your 35 highest years not 40 quarters .. you need 40 credits to be eligible for ss .

How are Benefits Calculated?
First, a worker’s previous earnings are restated in terms of today’s wages to reflect wage growth.
Second, earnings for the highest 35 years are averaged and divided by the number of months in 35 years to arrive at Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME).
Third, the Social Security benefit formula is applied to AIME to produce the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA), the benefit payable at Full Retirement Age (FRA).

Anyone born in 1929 or later needs 10 years of work (40 credits) to be eligible for retirement benefits. People born before 1929 need fewer years of work


https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10072.pdf

There are people out there getting "bare quarters" SS checks. That is they have enough quarters (11 years) to qualify for something from SS; but it is special minimum benefits. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/tableForm.html


https://blog.aarp.org/2014/10/16/the...nimum-benefit/


That is they only had an employment record (for SS purposes) that allowed them to *barely* qualify for the lowest amounts of payments. Needless to say such persons are in not so great shape financially; to wit poor.


Many of these persons are the ones who are on Medicare *and* Medicaid. The first is because are eligible by virtue of making enough payments into system (regardless of how low). Latter comes from their total household income being so low they are indigent or darn near.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2018, 06:26 PM
 
31,904 posts, read 26,961,756 times
Reputation: 24814
An older article from NYT, but still holds true today.
https://www.nytimes.com/1984/03/22/g...s-dilemma.html


No end of domestic (and some other) workers work off the books. Some of their own choosing, others because employer sets things up that way and they don't challenge.


Either way when it comes time to file for SS people are in for a shock. This sometimes extends to those employers who *should* have been deducting payroll taxes but didn't.


Of course the self-employed cannot use these arguments. Their income is wholly determined by what they themselves report.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 02:25 AM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
There are people out there getting "bare quarters" SS checks. That is they have enough quarters (11 years) to qualify for something from SS; but it is special minimum benefits. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/tableForm.html


https://blog.aarp.org/2014/10/16/the...nimum-benefit/


That is they only had an employment record (for SS purposes) that allowed them to *barely* qualify for the lowest amounts of payments. Needless to say such persons are in not so great shape financially; to wit poor.


Many of these persons are the ones who are on Medicare *and* Medicaid. The first is because are eligible by virtue of making enough payments into system (regardless of how low). Latter comes from their total household income being so low they are indigent or darn near.
spousal benefits allow many to get benefits far beyond their own record or even with no record .

i always thought that was an unfair perk today . we should all eat what we kill . not working is a personal choice .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 08:46 AM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,812,184 times
Reputation: 25191
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
spousal benefits allow many to get benefits far beyond their own record or even with no record .

i always thought that was an unfair perk today . we should all eat what we kill . not working is a personal choice .
Hell with that, spouse should be entitled to it. it is a family unit, a family decision, thus a family benefit. If wife stays home raising kids or whatever, husband works, why should the wife not be allowed to have such benefits if the husband dies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 08:51 AM
 
Location: SoCal
14,530 posts, read 20,118,288 times
Reputation: 10539
I was self-employed for many years as an engineering consultant, and I always paid both my share and employer's share of all payments due to Social Security and Medicare. I doubt that I could have hidden my obligation anyway, but in any case I'm glad I made the payments because now I have full Medicare coverage and a modest Social Security income.

I can't see how anybody but a low life would benefit from going off the radar. And even then, in the end it may do them more harm than good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2018, 02:28 PM
 
31,904 posts, read 26,961,756 times
Reputation: 24814
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
Hell with that, spouse should be entitled to it. it is a family unit, a family decision, thus a family benefit. If wife stays home raising kids or whatever, husband works, why should the wife not be allowed to have such benefits if the husband dies?

Because *she* or *he* didn't directly pay into SS?


In many European countries spousal and or survivor benefits have been phased out at least for those born after a certain date. This and or benefits are mean tested, or will kick in if a surviving spouse is truly destitute.



https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/prog...pe/france.html


SS in USA is one of the few if not only where both married and single persons pay same rates, but the former receive far more back in benefits. Ditto for those with children versus the childless.


A woman who has never worked a day in her life can receive a higher SS award (both spousal and survivor) than one who had a career spanning > 30 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top