Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2019, 09:48 AM
 
3,050 posts, read 4,991,412 times
Reputation: 3780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
when you boil it down the eitc credit is pretty much a form of welfare payment . it really is not a refund of income taxes since you did not pay in as much . it is a gift from the tax gods
Sorta true, but keep in mind, one has to have earned income to receive the EITC.

It is designed to act as an incentive to those who might otherwise do nothing and be an even bigger drag on taxpayers.

Arguable whether or not it achieves this goal...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2019, 09:55 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
any low income benefit that refunds you more in income tax then you pay in is welfare based .

you can put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Suburban wasteland of NC
354 posts, read 280,931 times
Reputation: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
Well let’s be clear my SALT have been at a fairly similar level for years so it was the tax law change that created said limit so prior to the 2018 tax year I didn’t max out the deduction. A prior poster didn’t understand how people could have been negatively impacted so I figured it was worth pointing out



I have zero desire to sell, move or downsize. But to suggest I do that to possibly save money on taxes is a bit shortsighted as the typical cost to sell a house and close on the transaction would cost upwards of 50k so not only would I downgrade my quality of life but also pay a lot to do it. I’m good paying the taxes

I get how a high earner in CA for example could owe more in Federal income taxes. Admittedly I still don't get the TX thing. If you're paying over 10k in property tax + sales tax on non-groceries then you must make a pretty decent income. However Trump lowered tax rates for higher earners, particularly those who were near the edges of some of the brackets.






A couple who was making 160k, for example, went from a marginal rate of 28% to 22%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 11:14 AM
 
21,909 posts, read 9,483,127 times
Reputation: 19443
Quote:
Originally Posted by happygeek View Post
I get how a high earner in CA for example could owe more in Federal income taxes. Admittedly I still don't get the TX thing. If you're paying over 10k in property tax + sales tax on non-groceries then you must make a pretty decent income. However Trump lowered tax rates for higher earners, particularly those who were near the edges of some of the brackets.






A couple who was making 160k, for example, went from a marginal rate of 28% to 22%.
Just curious. Do you understand how marginal rates work?

And $160k isn't all that high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 11:17 AM
 
106,579 posts, read 108,713,667 times
Reputation: 80063
Quote:
Originally Posted by happygeek View Post
I get how a high earner in CA for example could owe more in Federal income taxes. Admittedly I still don't get the TX thing. If you're paying over 10k in property tax + sales tax on non-groceries then you must make a pretty decent income. However Trump lowered tax rates for higher earners, particularly those who were near the edges of some of the brackets.






A couple who was making 160k, for example, went from a marginal rate of 28% to 22%.
these are the taxable brackets after deductions . plus all the money is not taxed at the highest level , it is bracketed . only the top hits the highest brackets not all the income. each step of the way up gets taxed lower until you get to the top .

so a couple with 77,401 in taxable income and 101,401 pre tax gets 1 dollar taxed at 22% , 58,350 at 12% and 19050 at 10%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 11:22 AM
 
26,191 posts, read 21,568,036 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by happygeek View Post
I get how a high earner in CA for example could owe more in Federal income taxes. Admittedly I still don't get the TX thing. If you're paying over 10k in property tax + sales tax on non-groceries then you must make a pretty decent income. However Trump lowered tax rates for higher earners, particularly those who were near the edges of some of the brackets.






A couple who was making 160k, for example, went from a marginal rate of 28% to 22%.

You couldn’t fathom how someone would be worse off and I pointed out how with the SALT limitations. You don’t have to understand my specific scenario or those in Texas but it is feasible that the limitations cost some tax payers more than they’d pick up in the tax bracket deltas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2019, 12:05 PM
 
3,050 posts, read 4,991,412 times
Reputation: 3780
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
any low income benefit that refunds you more in income tax then you pay in is welfare based .

you can put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig
nobody said it isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Suburban wasteland of NC
354 posts, read 280,931 times
Reputation: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
these are the taxable brackets after deductions . plus all the money is not taxed at the highest level , it is bracketed . only the top hits the highest brackets not all the income. each step of the way up gets taxed lower until you get to the top .

so a couple with 77,401 in taxable income and 101,401 pre tax gets 1 dollar taxed at 22% , 58,350 at 12% and 19050 at 10%

Exactly, that's why I stated marginal. That $58,350 getting taxed at 12% instead of the prior 15% saves them $1,750.50.


160k is in the top quintile (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/stat...come-quintiles).

Last edited by happygeek; 01-16-2019 at 10:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:57 AM
 
1,347 posts, read 944,510 times
Reputation: 3958
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
when you boil it down the eitc credit is pretty much a form of welfare payment . it really is not a refund of income taxes since you did not pay in as much . it is a gift from the tax gods
True. It's been around since before I was born (I didn't realize it was that long-lived until I googled it), but my understanding is that it was sold as somehow being more sensible than having poor people pay taxes, only to turn around and give them money (welfare). So it almost seemed like a welfare "cut", or at least not a direct handout.

Ironically, now (especially in recent years), its beneficiaries are chided for not paying any taxes. So it ultimately doesn't really matter how you structure it (taxes + welfare, or no taxes and smaller welfare in form of tax "refund"), the recipients still get demonized.



On the original topic... this might be asking too much, but do your taxes by hand (spreadsheet, whatever) and do a line by line compare of where the differences are (start with the total liability and total paid lines). It should match what came out of the software. Yes, it's tedious, but it's probably not truly difficult. As nice as tax software is, a lot of people blindly depend on it to the point of not really understanding what all the drivers are and how much in taxes they really are paying on a net basis every year (and what changes they can make to impact those values).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 09:21 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyDancer View Post
On the original topic... this might be asking too much, but do your taxes by hand (spreadsheet, whatever) and do a line by line compare of where the differences are (start with the total liability and total paid lines). It should match what came out of the software. Yes, it's tedious, but it's probably not truly difficult. As nice as tax software is, a lot of people blindly depend on it to the point of not really understanding what all the drivers are and how much in taxes they really are paying on a net basis every year (and what changes they can make to impact those values).

That's how I do my taxes. Spreadsheet and then file with FreeFillableForms which is the most primitive web interface on the planet. I maintain a cocktail napkin version all year to make sure I'm not under or over-withholding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top