Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2019, 05:48 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,091 posts, read 82,482,448 times
Reputation: 43648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
The weird part is I don't think we really disagree that much.
I think you're reading stuff into my posts that isn't really there.
What's weird about it? I'd say it's all too common...
and such pretty much sums up MOST of what gets written in any thread after the first page or two.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2019, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
29,790 posts, read 18,652,422 times
Reputation: 25777
I don't think anyone can deny that housing can be the biggest wealth killer or wealth builder so do your homework before you buy. I personally didn't buy a home until I was 35, now I own 4.5.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 07:01 AM
 
6,337 posts, read 4,063,886 times
Reputation: 12926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
And that 200k down payment if invested fully earning 6% a year and reinvesting earnings would be worth 1.2mm at the end of 30 years with nearly no maintence costs

With the 800k mortgage your payment is roughly 3600.00 monthly, add in taxes and insurance and you can easily be at 4800.00 a month. Assuming you rented something 30% cheaper than that you have an additional 1430.00 a month to invest. If added to the down payment investment monthly you’d have 2.65MM at the end of 30 years. Notice this example does not include rent increase, maintenance costs for the house, tax or instance cost increase for the house either. The above example is just too simple and onesided
30 Consistant years at 6%, dream on❗️
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 07:54 AM
 
105,739 posts, read 107,717,837 times
Reputation: 79355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickcin View Post
30 Consistant years at 6%, dream on❗️
i had 30 years averaging of over 10% just following the fidelity insight newsletter ... many here use it and best of all it was done using plain old fidelity funds ... 100k invested is 2.90 million today , 10k is 290,000 ..even an s&p index fund is within 400k of that 2.90 million .. markets have averaged 8-9% at least , over every 30 year time frame since 1877. even the great depression time frame recovered adjusted for inflation in 4-1/2 years .

Last edited by mathjak107; 04-08-2019 at 08:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Central CT, sometimes FL and NH.
4,478 posts, read 6,730,809 times
Reputation: 5883
Renting versus owning is a function of lifestyle, personal preferences, local housing conditions, and one's time horizon. Your primary home should not be viewed as an investment (though it may end up as one if one downsizes and cashes out at a profit) and many recommend it shouldn't be considered in your net worth calculations (far too many do often leading to spending more than they should based on illusionary and illiquid paper wealth).

We never treated our primary home like an investment. Instead is was just a forced savings plan through accelerated pay downs that grounded us and reduced the temptation to indulge in expensive vacations and purchases. I don't count my primary residence in my net worth but do so for other properties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Sputnik Planitia
7,824 posts, read 11,715,734 times
Reputation: 9044
Average CAGR for the S&P 500 1970-present is 10.22% (with dividend reinvestment) so 6% would be significantly below historical actually!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 12:09 PM
 
30,856 posts, read 36,757,475 times
Reputation: 34384
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
What's weird about it? I'd say it's all too common...
and such pretty much sums up MOST of what gets written in any thread after the first page or two.
It isn't that common for me, I don't think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
29,790 posts, read 18,652,422 times
Reputation: 25777
Quote:
Originally Posted by k374 View Post
Average CAGR for the S&P 500 1970-present is 10.22% (with dividend reinvestment) so 6% would be significantly below historical actually!
But that's no guarantee in the future and one would also need to calculate taxes into whatever they made at some point to account for that cost in their calculations as well as inflation.

Maybe I'm overly conservative but I calculate a return of 4% above inflation as pretty good especially if you diversify into lower risk investments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 01:51 PM
 
105,739 posts, read 107,717,837 times
Reputation: 79355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
But that's no guarantee in the future and one would also need to calculate taxes into whatever they made at some point to account for that cost in their calculations as well as inflation.

Maybe I'm overly conservative but I calculate a return of 4% above inflation as pretty good especially if you diversify into lower risk investments.
you can see inflation adjusted returns here for the last 50 years .

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2019, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Sputnik Planitia
7,824 posts, read 11,715,734 times
Reputation: 9044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
Maybe I'm overly conservative but I calculate a return of 4% above inflation as pretty good especially if you diversify into lower risk investments.
historically per Shiller, homes do not return 4% real. They return very close to 0% real or in other words match inflation or are slightly above inflation in some markets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top