Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2019, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,569,440 times
Reputation: 16693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Putski View Post
Curious as to everyone's thoughts on this. This is a combination of average pre-tax/post-tax savings plus home equity for the "above average person" as defined by the blogger Financial Samurai. This blogger's been cited by CNBC and other credible sources in the past. He's usually aggressive with his projections/savings goals but I thought this was fairly reasonable, or not?

Age/Net Worth

22: $0
23: $20,250
24: $46,750
25: $79,000
30: $250,000
35: $429,000
40: $660,250
45: $914,000
50: $1,240,250
55: $1,684,000
60: $2,180,250
65: $2,871,500

Source: https://www.financialsamurai.com/wha...e-30-40-50-60/
So is this for a single person?
If a couple is 50 years old should they have a total,net worth of 2.5 million? Or the 1.2 million?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2019, 07:48 PM
 
Location: Oak Bowery
2,873 posts, read 2,061,531 times
Reputation: 9164
Dang. Missed again. Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2019, 10:10 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,760,547 times
Reputation: 16993
I think it’s for a person, not a couple. Double it for a couple is my guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2019, 11:59 PM
 
30,897 posts, read 36,958,653 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by k7baixo View Post
Dang. Missed again. Lol
Me, too. Oh well. At least mine's on a decent upward trajectory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 12:10 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,569,440 times
Reputation: 16693
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
I think it’s for a person, not a couple. Double it for a couple is my guess.
Those are pretty high numbers then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 02:20 AM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
Those are pretty high numbers then.
they would be way higher then most people i know would be , if it does not count one pot of assets for a couple.

i now very few couples who would be 2x those numbers , especially because usually one person is responsible for bringing the bulk of the assets in to the marriage or accumulating those assets in the marriage unless it was a 2nd marriage where both parties tend to bring assets to the party
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 02:56 AM
 
11 posts, read 7,264 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
Those are pretty high numbers then.
This calculator uses household data from 2016:
https://www.shnugi.com/networth-percentile-calculator/

If you doubled these "above average" numbers, a couple would land in the 98-100th percentile. That seems rather absurd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 03:27 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,431,507 times
Reputation: 13442
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
Those are pretty high numbers then.
My net worth isn’t even close to HALF of that number at my age bracket AND I have a spouse.

You win some you lose some lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 03:39 AM
 
Location: Honolulu, HI
24,630 posts, read 9,458,962 times
Reputation: 22968
Quote:
Originally Posted by aslowdodge View Post
Those are pretty high numbers then.
Without salary, careerfield, and location data these number are useless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2019, 03:44 AM
 
106,671 posts, read 108,833,673 times
Reputation: 80159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocko20 View Post
Without salary, careerfield, and location data these number are useless.
a lot of the numbers may be from other sources of money .... looking at what they do for a living may mean little .

heck in our later years we made more in our investments , which was continually compounding , then my wife and i earned .


the power of compounding takes the bits and pieces we do manage to save and turns it in to more meaningful amounts .. so i m not so sure salary may play that large of a roll
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top