Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,351 posts, read 8,569,440 times
Reputation: 16693
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan Putski
Curious as to everyone's thoughts on this. This is a combination of average pre-tax/post-tax savings plus home equity for the "above average person" as defined by the blogger Financial Samurai. This blogger's been cited by CNBC and other credible sources in the past. He's usually aggressive with his projections/savings goals but I thought this was fairly reasonable, or not?
they would be way higher then most people i know would be , if it does not count one pot of assets for a couple.
i now very few couples who would be 2x those numbers , especially because usually one person is responsible for bringing the bulk of the assets in to the marriage or accumulating those assets in the marriage unless it was a 2nd marriage where both parties tend to bring assets to the party
Without salary, careerfield, and location data these number are useless.
a lot of the numbers may be from other sources of money .... looking at what they do for a living may mean little .
heck in our later years we made more in our investments , which was continually compounding , then my wife and i earned .
the power of compounding takes the bits and pieces we do manage to save and turns it in to more meaningful amounts .. so i m not so sure salary may play that large of a roll
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.