Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2009, 09:16 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,435,320 times
Reputation: 15038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneOne View Post
Yes, but if a customer rarely uses the card, the merchant fees are not going to be enough to cover the costs.
There are a lot of us who use a card for everything -- and then pay it off every month.

Using a very low-ball figure of $600 a month charged x 2% merchant fee (again, low) = $12 a month.

That's $144 a year profit from just one cardholder who pays in full every month.

More than a $99 annual fee.

The break even point for the card companies would be between $400 - $450 charged each month.

(Ghods, I hope my math is right! It's so embarressing when I see a mistake after I hit enter )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2009, 09:20 PM
 
Location: SoCal desert
8,091 posts, read 15,435,320 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallysmom View Post
You young whippersnappers are too young to remember, but all Visa/Mastercards used to charge annual fees.
JC Penneys didn't though

A person never forgets her first
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2009, 11:25 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 29,154,335 times
Reputation: 3631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty View Post
LOL....
pay it off except 10/20 dollars a month...
Then you get hit with their "minimum finance charge." For carrying a 10 dollar balance you pay 2 bucks.. that's 240% APR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2009, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Bristol, CT
90 posts, read 209,566 times
Reputation: 62
Here's the thing with me, I don't necessarily mind an annual fee. I got my AmEx knowing it had one, but for these other cards to start brining them into the picture after having the cards for years kind of isn't fair. And regarding the whole cash thing, I do use cash. I stopped using credit cards for everything and I already got punished for it. One card I stopped using for months cut my limit down to $200 just bc I wasn't using it!
I believe it's unfair to be charged for not using a card. There's nothing to even do about it either bc if I went ahead and just closed those cards, then my credit would be affected!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2009, 07:10 PM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,267,243 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct4life View Post
I believe it's unfair to be charged for not using a card. There's nothing to even do about it either bc if I went ahead and just closed those cards, then my credit would be affected!
You're credit won't be affected that much, and unless you're in the market for a mortgage in the near future, it doesn't much matter anyway. Your credit score will correct itself soon enough if you do other things properly.

As for the fairness of charging for not using a card, you have to remember that idle accounts are an expense for card issuers. They have to pay for things like pulling cardholders' credit records and insuring cards against fraudulent use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2009, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Central, NJ
2,731 posts, read 6,118,789 times
Reputation: 4110
"Citigroup, meanwhile, has started charging annual fees to card holders who don't put more than a specific amount on their cards, typically $2,400 a year. "

This doesn't seem too outrageous. It really doesn't seem like a stretch to average $200 a month on a credit card. I put EVERYTHING on my card to get rewards points. If I just paid for groceries with it I'd easily make that minimum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2009, 11:10 AM
 
1,402 posts, read 3,501,601 times
Reputation: 1315
This again? haha

Let them charge fees for paying off on time....if free market principles apply, then there will also be banks who will offer no-fee cards to capitalize on those who don't want to pay fees. I don't see what the problems is. People will choose what credit cards they carry based upon where they see value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2009, 10:39 PM
 
2,036 posts, read 4,244,573 times
Reputation: 3201
Quote:
Originally Posted by ct4life View Post
It really blows my mind that consumers would even do business with these sharks, but I have a solution.

Most Credit Union issued credit cards do not charge exorbitant fees, although some charge nominal annual fees. Because there isn't a profit motive for the credit unions, I can see them as a positive alternative to traditional bank credit cards.

The only drawback to a CU issued credit card is that, say you have an auto loan that you are current on with the same credit union, it can be used as collateral for the card should you default on the credit card.

Right now, my CU issued card carries a 7.9% fixed interest rate and no fees. There are good cards to be found, I just choose not to deal at all with any kind of hyperbank (Wells Fargo, BoA, etc).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2009, 10:41 PM
 
2,036 posts, read 4,244,573 times
Reputation: 3201
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneOne View Post
You're credit won't be affected that much, and unless you're in the market for a mortgage in the near future, it doesn't much matter anyway. Your credit score will correct itself soon enough if you do other things properly.

As for the fairness of charging for not using a card, you have to remember that idle accounts are an expense for card issuers. They have to pay for things like pulling cardholders' credit records and insuring cards against fraudulent use.
Oh, the pity I feel for those poor, starving credit card companies with no one using their cards. So many sit idle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2009, 10:05 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,325 posts, read 5,509,755 times
Reputation: 2596
I can't believe anyone is still defending credit card companies!!! Maybe you work for them. I, for one, have had it. They've become glorified loan sharks charging 20 and 30% to people with perfect credit. They can go to hell. I'm closing all of my accounts and paying cash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top