|

10-26-2009, 08:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
41 posts, read 12,437 times
Reputation: 21
|
|
new credit card fees?!!?
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:27 PM
|
|
TANSTAAFL!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SoCal desert
1,550 posts, read 400,623 times
Reputation: 1674
|
|
|
Glad I don't do business with B of A or Citibank :-)
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Jesus is the reason for the season..."
(set 11 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
1,898 posts, read 575,601 times
Reputation: 677
|
|
|
like the article I posted says....all banks are watching this
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,631 posts, read 950,232 times
Reputation: 659
|
|
|
Sounds reasonable to me. The bank is extending a service (trouble-free means of payment) that presents a cost to them, why shouldn't they seek to cover their costs?
I find annual fees much more straightforward than sudden interest rate increases or changes in minimum payment changes. At least it's not done through deception and fine-print trickery.
The bank is not there to reward one type of behavior or punish another. It is there to make money for its owners. Nothing more, nothing less. If you, the consumer, don't like that, then there is always another legal tender available called cash.
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"party time!"
(set 16 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: southwestern PA... where it is beginning to look a lot like Christmas!
1,232 posts, read 664,986 times
Reputation: 585
|
|
|
Yet another reason to avoid Citibank and Bank of America!
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Right where I want to be.
2,981 posts, read 1,254,058 times
Reputation: 1748
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoneOne
Sounds reasonable to me. The bank is extending a service (trouble-free means of payment) that presents a cost to them, why shouldn't they seek to cover their costs?
I find annual fees much more straightforward than sudden interest rate increases or changes in minimum payment changes. At least it's not done through deception and fine-print trickery.
The bank is not there to reward one type of behavior or punish another. It is there to make money for its owners. Nothing more, nothing less. If you, the consumer, don't like that, then there is always another legal tender available called cash.
|
Don't they already collect a fee from the merchant at the time of purchase? They are already earning 2-3% on every transaction. I doubt those who pay in full are costing them anything...but they aren't earning anything extra by way of interest or direct consumer fees and it is all about profit...the bigger the better.
You are right about using cash though....no hassle, no late fees, no overdraft, no annual fees, etc. The trick is in finding a cashier who can count back change properly....heaven forbid if they type the total wrong into the machine and they don't know how much to change to give. 
|
|

10-26-2009, 08:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,631 posts, read 950,232 times
Reputation: 659
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCyank
Don't they already collect a fee from the merchant at the time of purchase? They are already earning 2-3% on every transaction.
|
Yes, but if a customer rarely uses the card, the merchant fees are not going to be enough to cover the costs. Maintaining a card costs the credit card companies money (don't ask me how much, but there are obviously expenses like pulling credit records and insuring cards against fraudulent use that firms must bear).
At the end of the day, though, it's business and economics. Cards will charge whatever the market will bear. If some company is able to run its affairs in such a way as to generate enough money purely from the merchant fees, then they'll win on competitiveness.
|
|

10-26-2009, 09:13 PM
|
|
_____________________
Status:
"depressed"
(set 18 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
2,690 posts, read 1,060,269 times
Reputation: 860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromekitty
like the article I posted says....all banks are watching this
|
Let them watch this. If Wells Fargo pulls this on me, I will take out all my savings because of it. 
|
|

10-26-2009, 09:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Jesus is the reason for the season..."
(set 11 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
1,898 posts, read 575,601 times
Reputation: 677
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by las vegas drunk
Let them watch this. If Wells Fargo pulls this on me, I will take out all my savings because of it. 
|
LOL....
pay it off except 10/20 dollars a month... 
|
|

10-26-2009, 10:02 PM
|
|
Pennsylvanian from 1738
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oakland CA
1,998 posts, read 1,682,893 times
Reputation: 506
|
|
|
You young whippersnappers are too young to remember, but all Visa/Mastercards used to charge annual fees. And we gladly paid them for the convenience.
I know in our household we'll close most of our accounts, and just keep two -- one for business and one for personal. And the winners will be the lowest annual fee.
But more importantly I think the whole FICO score hostage drama has to stop, too.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|