U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 08-18-2012, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Montco PA
1,191 posts, read 1,750,028 times
Reputation: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
Won't get done and public opinion is not in favor of these projects, including the Reading Branch restoration. That's what shot down the last proposal a couple of years ago. I agree the extension needs to be made though, but not by SEPTA. Since SEPTA wants to extend commuter rail to Reading it inflates the cost. Restoration, for instance, of service to West Chester or Newtown makes more sense as commuter rail. SEPTA's insistence on running more extensive and more frequent trains has hobbled their ability to expand at all. At this rate agencies servicing metro New York will start to expand into PA before SEPTA sees one completed expansion to their system. You also have to take into account that SEPTA is notoriously anti-rail to begin with. They prefer buses. IMO inter-city service like that should be run as the line between Philadelphia and Harrisburg is already run by Amtrak. In fact, I'd rather see Amtrak restore service to Reading than SEPTA since I think they would be restoring service on an inter-city paradigm that has a much higher chance of being realized, as well as would better serve the Reading market for rail travel. Only a few thousand people commute from Reading to the I-76 corridor and Philadelphia, so commuter rail is really unnecessary. Most of those commuters on the 422 corridor are mainly leaving from a suburban development in the exurbs to a suburban office park in the suburbs, so they're not the best market for linking with rail transit which needs dense development on at least one end to be attractive to commuters. Which is why I think inter-city service as run by Amtrak is a better paradigm, and it allows for an entity to pick up service that already has the existing equipment (SEPTA would have to buy all new diesel push-pull or MU equipment). In fact, Amtrak has run charter trains to Reading in the past via Harrisburg and Lebannon over NS's trackage. Service could be extended from Harrisburg to Lebannon, Reading, Allentown, Bethlehem, and then on to New Jersey and New York all along existing track.
I hear what you are saying about the "inter-city" concept vs. the "regional rail" concept. I hear it loud and clear and I think you are right. You are also correct that SEPTA's insistence to want to expand to Reading inflates the cost. I'm all for improving the City of Reading but there is absolutely benefit to extending the "regional rail" concept out to Pottstown. I'd call it a game-change for the Collegeville/Limerick area, where I happen to live. Right now to get into the city for anything is difficult. The idea that any of the several hundred thousand people (and growing) who live in this area might someday soon be able to drive to Royersford or Phoenixville, get on the train and take it to CC is huge. Thing about it - it's a game-changer. The last time the 422 corridor had good rail access, 422 wasn't built, the only thing here was the boroughs (C-Ville, Trappe, RoFo, P-Ville, Linfield, Pottstown, etc) and farmland and there was no congestion.

You are correct when you say that most people along the 422 corridor drive to work in a suburban area - I'm one of them. But the projected ridership of extended service to Pottstown, or Reading, is like 5-7k per day, not 100,000 per day. Not everyone is all of a sudden going to take the train just because it's there - it's the rail link to the city that is hugely important. Extending service to Reading isn't going to make the congestion on 422 disappear but it will help somewhat and it will provide for more smart-growth and TOD opportunities. Even the O'Neill apartment development in Audubon by the river was designed in consideration of the Port Kennedy train station across the river (within walking distance). The idea is that people can walk to the train from the complex by taking the 422 bridge (and, eventually, the pedestrian-only replacement to the Betzwood Bridge). These are not pie-in-the sky, impossible ideas. These are good ideas and it's nice to know that people around here are thinking about them. Considering this region was at the forefront of the formation and building of this country's infrastructure, we have certainly fallen back.

Philadelphia-to-Reading does seem more like an AmTrak concept but Philadelphia-to-Pottstown is a regional rail concept and it's unfortunate that in this region this service has not been restored. It's actually almost laughable considering the size of the region and the fact that the rail line and the stations are just sitting there, underutilized.

Check out this link to a nice Wikipedia article about the failed Schuylkill Valley Metro. That $2.2B plan was pie-in-the sky nonsense.

Schuylkill Valley Metro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This important quote is right from the article and hits at the crux of this issue:

Quote:
Noted transit expert John Pawson, author of Delaware Valley Rails: The Railroads and Rail Transit Lines of the Philadelphia Area, made a pointed argument as to why the SVM has continually been pushed by elected officials given its many obstalces. In a November 2010 communication sent to the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Regional Citizens Committee, Pawson stated the following:

“Tax policy and political ideology should not distort and stifle the rail system. Other major metropolitan areas that enjoy radial commuter rail services are gradually extending their networks. We have been stymied by planned absurdities such as the Schuylkill Valley and Cross County Metros that are political constructs.
---------------------

Why does the Norristown line stop at 19.5 miles when there is development out to 40 miles? It's absurd. And it's easy to fix this. Other regions get $ to expand their networks; why can't we? (Answer: we can). State Rep and anti-toll crusader Mike Vereb got his 5 minutes of fame by lambasting the tolling concept, but I don't believe he ever came out and said he was against the restoration of rail service - only a moron would say such a thing.

Marius - The public is not against restoration of rail service. They are simply against paying tolls to do so. While I would not have minded paying $2 per day to save gas, and, even more importantly 45 minutes per day by sitting in less traffic, other people feel differently, and are led to slaughter by their brainless, visionless, gutless politicians.

To use your words, "only a few thousand" people use certain of the regional rail now but that certainly doesn't mean they should be shut down. So even if only a few thousand per day will commute from the 422 corridor that does not mean it isn't a great idea.

Also, SEPTA management is not nearly as dumb as they were 30, 20, or even 10 years ago. They just won that award (best US public transportation system) and one of the reasons is because their management has come a long long way. They are foolish if they are anti-rail because from what I know the regional rails are more self-sufficient, and growing. There is some anti-train sentiment in the burbs but I know of no townships/boroughs along the 422 corridor who flat-out don't want to extend service to Reading. The fact that local municipalities are approving TOD-like developments is a good sign because they are thinking of this as well. 20 years is much too long to wait for the restoration of rail, considering it's been talked about for the last 20.

Last edited by toobusytoday; 08-20-2012 at 10:27 AM.. Reason: link and SNIPPET please
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 08-18-2012, 11:30 AM
 
16,325 posts, read 9,423,387 times
Reputation: 4330
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPP1999 View Post
I hear what you are saying about the "inter-city" concept vs. the "regional rail" concept. I hear it loud and clear and I think you are right. You are also correct that SEPTA's insistence to want to expand to Reading inflates the cost. I'm all for improving the City of Reading but there is absolutely benefit to extending the "regional rail" concept out to Pottstown. I'd call it a game-change for the Collegeville/Limerick area, where I happen to live. Right now to get into the city for anything is difficult. The idea that any of the several hundred thousand people (and growing) who live in this area might someday soon be able to drive to Royersford or Phoenixville, get on the train and take it to CC is huge. Thing about it - it's a game-changer. The last time the 422 corridor had good rail access, 422 wasn't built, the only thing here was the boroughs (C-Ville, Trappe, RoFo, P-Ville, Linfield, Pottstown, etc) and farmland and there was no congestion.

You are correct when you say that most people along the 422 corridor drive to work in a suburban area - I'm one of them. But the projected ridership of extended service to Pottstown, or Reading, is like 5-7k per day, not 100,000 per day. Not everyone is all of a sudden going to take the train just because it's there - it's the rail link to the city that is hugely important. Extending service to Reading isn't going to make the congestion on 422 disappear but it will help somewhat and it will provide for more smart-growth and TOD opportunities. Even the O'Neill apartment development in Audubon by the river was designed in consideration of the Port Kennedy train station across the river (within walking distance). The idea is that people can walk to the train from the complex by taking the 422 bridge (and, eventually, the pedestrian-only replacement to the Betzwood Bridge). These are not pie-in-the sky, impossible ideas. These are good ideas and it's nice to know that people around here are thinking about them. Considering this region was at the forefront of the formation and building of this country's infrastructure, we have certainly fallen back.

Philadelphia-to-Reading does seem more like an AmTrak concept but Philadelphia-to-Pottstown is a regional rail concept and it's unfortunate that in this region this service has not been restored. It's actually almost laughable considering the size of the region and the fact that the rail line and the stations are just sitting there, underutilized.

Check out this link to a nice Wikipedia article about the failed Schuylkill Valley Metro. That $2.2B plan was pie-in-the sky nonsense.

Schuylkill Valley Metro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This important quote is right from the article and hits at the crux of this issue:

Quote:
Noted transit expert John Pawson, author of Delaware Valley Rails: The Railroads and Rail Transit Lines of the Philadelphia Area, made a pointed argument as to why the SVM has continually been pushed by elected officials given its many obstalces. In a November 2010 communication sent to the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Regional Citizens Committee, Pawson stated the following:

“Tax policy and political ideology should not distort and stifle the rail system. Other major metropolitan areas that enjoy radial commuter rail services are gradually extending their networks. We have been stymied by planned absurdities such as the Schuylkill Valley and Cross County Metros that are political constructs.
---------------------

Why does the Norristown line stop at 19.5 miles when there is development out to 40 miles? It's absurd. And it's easy to fix this. Other regions get $ to expand their networks; why can't we? (Answer: we can). State Rep and anti-toll crusader Mike Vereb got his 5 minutes of fame by lambasting the tolling concept, but I don't believe he ever came out and said he was against the restoration of rail service - only a moron would say such a thing.

Marius - The public is not against restoration of rail service. They are simply against paying tolls to do so. While I would not have minded paying $2 per day to save gas, and, even more importantly 45 minutes per day by sitting in less traffic, other people feel differently, and are led to slaughter by their brainless, visionless, gutless politicians.

To use your words, "only a few thousand" people use certain of the regional rail now but that certainly doesn't mean they should be shut down. So even if only a few thousand per day will commute from the 422 corridor that does not mean it isn't a great idea.

Also, SEPTA management is not nearly as dumb as they were 30, 20, or even 10 years ago. They just won that award (best US public transportation system) and one of the reasons is because their management has come a long long way. They are foolish if they are anti-rail because from what I know the regional rails are more self-sufficient, and growing. There is some anti-train sentiment in the burbs but I know of no townships/boroughs along the 422 corridor who flat-out don't want to extend service to Reading. The fact that local municipalities are approving TOD-like developments is a good sign because they are thinking of this as well. 20 years is much too long to wait for the restoration of rail, considering it's been talked about for the last 20.

While I agree there is demand out the 422 corrider why not try to build/fix infrastructure that is most beneficial to whole. I posted a route that extends a spur of the BSL subway with a high speed (better headway) line out to the KOP area. To me it might make more sense to continue the 422 corrider with a light rail option that can also serve the 202 corrider from say Great valley (maybe even exton) down to Norristown or even into Ft Wash. This can have a link with a new heavy rail extension that uses the row along the Norristown RR line (which in my fantasy map would no longer run but link to the Norristown high speed line at Gulf mills) and connect with in the KOP area. Also a light rail could also link with the 100 line in Norristown. The light rail may give better access to actual job centers along the 202 corrider and up 422 plus a resident commuter access to the a new Heavey rail line. I think TOD is better available under this plan IMHO. This whole western area (with a ton of jobs and resdients) is significantly under covered. Assuming some decent headways a light rail link from say the collegeville town center could get with one transfer to CC in under an hour, not bad as a commuter option and creating better additional connectivty along the 202 and 422 corrider.


Lastly for this to realistically work Montco residents may have to augment some of the bill. Probably a .25% income tax would more than cover it including the heavy rail additionas from the BSL.

So probably still a fantasy...

Last edited by toobusytoday; 08-21-2012 at 07:26 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-18-2012, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Montco PA
1,191 posts, read 1,750,028 times
Reputation: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
While I agree there is demand out the 422 corrider why not try to build/fix infrastructure that is most beneficial to whole. I posted a route that extends a spur of the BSL subway with a high speed (better headway) line out to the KOP area. To me it might make more sense to continue the 422 corrider with a light rail option that can also serve the 202 corrider from say Great valley (maybe even exton) down to Norristown or even into Ft Wash. This can have a link with a new heavy rail extension that uses the row along the Norristown RR line (which in my fantasy map would no longer run but link to the Norristown high speed line at Gulf mills) and connect with in the KOP area. Also a light rail could also link with the 100 line in Norristown. The light rail may give better access to actual job centers along the 202 corrider and up 422 plus a resident commuter access to the a new Heavey rail line. I think TOD is better available under this plan IMHO. This whole western area (with a ton of jobs and resdients) is significantly under covered. Assuming some decent headways a light rail link from say the collegeville town center could get with one transfer to CC in under an hour, not bad as a commuter option and creating better additional connectivty along the 202 and 422 corrider.


Lastly for this to realistically work Montco residents may have to augment some of the bill. Probably a .25% income tax would more than cover it including the heavy rail additionas from the BSL.

So probably still a fantasy...
I like your idea and I agree that a simple restoration to Reading leaves gaps but it's feasible because there's nothing extraordinary, radical, or overly expensive. IMO the ideas that win out will be those that are not pie-in-the-sky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-18-2012, 12:14 PM
 
16,325 posts, read 9,423,387 times
Reputation: 4330
MapQuest Maps - Driving Directions - Map
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-18-2012, 01:18 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,154 posts, read 730,686 times
Reputation: 594
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPP1999 View Post
words
All the more reason to allow an agency like Amtrak to take over inter-city service. Bring in somebody who has no skin in the game like SEPTA and the local governments do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-20-2012, 09:38 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
11,607 posts, read 8,293,688 times
Reputation: 3619
Continuing on with the station by station stuff...the Map will be fixed later today

https://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid...27942,0.617294

Current , Proposed / Planned or Under Construction Stations

Urban Heavy Rail & Urban & Suburban Trolleys

Current Network

Heavy Rail

Broad Street line
Fern Rock
Olney
Logan
Wyoming
Hunting Park
Erie
Allegheny
North Philadelphia
Susquehanna–Dauphin
Cecil B. Moore
Girard
Fairmount
Spring Garden
Race–Vine
City Hall
Walnut–Locust
Lombard–South
Ellsworth–Federal
Tasker–Morris
Snyder
Oregon
Pattison
11th - Oiagonal
Fort Enterprise


Broad Street Spur
Fern Rock
Olney
Erie
North Philadelphia
Girard
Spring Garden
Chinatown
8th Street


Market - Frankford line
Strahie Street Terminal
Rhawn Street
Napfle Street
Cottman Ave
Knorr Street
Roosevelt Bouevard

Frankford Transportation Center
Margaret-Orthodox
Church
Erie-Torresdale
Tioga
Allegheny
Somerset
Huntingdon
York-Dauphin
Berks
Girard
Spring Garden
2nd Street
5th Street
8th Street
11th Street
13th Street
15th Street
30th Street
34th Street
40th Street
46th Street
52nd Street
56th Street
60th Street
63rd Street
Millbourne
69th Street Terminal


Norristown High Speed Line
Norristown Transportation Center
Bridgeport
DeKalb Street
Hughes Park
Gulph Mills
Matsonford
County Line
Villanova
Stadium – Ithan Avenue
Garrett Hill
Roberts Road
Bryn Mawr
Haverford
Ardmore Avenue
Ardmore Junction
Wynnewood Road
Beechwood–Brookline
Penfield
Township Line Road
Parkview
69th Street Terminal


PATCO High Speed line
15th–16th & Locust
12–13th & Locust
9–10th & Locust
8th & Market
Franklin Square
City Hall
Broadway
Ferry Avenue
Collingswood
Westmont
Haddonfield
Woodcrest
Ashland
Lindenwold


Suburban Trolleys

101 Media Trolley
69th Street Terminal
Fairfield Avenue
Walnut Street
Avon Road
Hilltop Road
Beverly Boulevard
Congress Avenue
Lansdowne Avenue
Drexel Park
Irvington Road
Drexel Hill Junction
Huey Avenue
School Lane
Aronimink
Anderson Avenue
Drexelbrook
Drexeline
Scenic Road
Springfield Road
Saxer Avenue
Leamy Avenue
Woodland Avenue
Thomson Avenue
Springfield Mall
Paper Mill Road
Pine Ridge
Beatty Road
Providence Road
Manchester Avenue
Edgemont Street
Monroe Street
Jackson Street
Olive Street
Veterans Square
Media–Orange Street

102 Sharon Hill Trolley
69th Street Terminal
Fairfield Avenue
Walnut Street
Avon Road
Hilltop Road
Beverly Boulevard
Congress Avenue
Lansdowne Avenue
Drexel Park
Irvington Road
Drexel Hill Junction
Garrettford
Drexel Manor
Marshall Road
Creek Road
Baltimore Pike
Penn Street
Springfield Road
Clifton–Aldan
Providence Road
Magnolia Avenue
North Street
Bartram Avenue
Andrews Avenue
MacDade Boulevard
Sharon Hill


RiverLINE
West Trenton Transit Hub
Lower Ferry Road
Parkside Ave
Prospect Street
Calhoun & Bernard Street
Calhoun & Passaic Street
State House
State and Warren Street
State and Canal Street

Trenton Transit Center
Hamilton Ave
Cass Street
Bordentown
Roebling
Florence
Burlington Towne Centre
Burlington South
Beverly-Edgewater Park
Delanco
Riverside
Cinnaminson
Riverton
Palmyra
Pennsauken-Route 73
Pennsauken Transit Center
36th Street
Walter Rand Transportation ctr
Cooper St-Rutgers Univ.
Aquarium
Entertainment Center




Future Network

Heavy Rail Network

Roosevelt Boulevard Subway
Woodhaven Road Park & Ridge
Red Lion Road
Grant Ave - Northeast Philadelphia Airport
Holme Ave
Cottman Ave
Bustleton Ave
Castor Ave
Whitaker Ave
North 5th Street

Hunting Park
Erie
Allegheny
North Philadelphia
Susquehanna–Dauphin
Cecil B. Moore
Girard
Fairmount
Spring Garden
Race–Vine
City Hall
Walnut–Locust
Lombard–South
Ellsworth–Federal
Tasker–Morris
Snyder
Oregon
Pattison
11th - Oiagonal
Fort Enterprise


Norristown High Speed Line Extension
Valley Forge Transit Center
Valley Forge National Historical Park
Village at Valley Forge
King of Prussia

Hughes Park
Gulph Mills
Matsonford
County Line
Villanova
Stadium – Ithan Avenue
Garrett Hill
Roberts Road
Bryn Mawr
Haverford
Ardmore Avenue
Ardmore Junction
Wynnewood Road
Beechwood–Brookline
Penfield
Township Line Road
Parkview
69th Street Terminal


Trolleys

Ivy Ridge Trolley - Route 17
Upper Ivy Ridge
Leverington Ave
Belmont Ave
Conshohocken State Road
City Ave
Wynnefield Avenue
Bryn Mawr Ave
52nd & West Jefferson Street
West Philadelphia Transit Center

(Continues along Route 10 Till Center City)


City Branch Trolley
Girard Av & 63rd St
(Continues along Route 15 intill Girard Av & 33rd St)
Sedgley Dr
North 52nd Street
Spring Garden Street
North 21st Street
North 18th Street
Board Street

(S-Curves onto Callowhill Street)
Callowhill & Ridge Ave
Callowhill & 6th Ave
Callowhill & 3rd Ave
Callowhill & Riverfront


Waterfront Trolley
Richmond St & Westmoreland
(Continues along Route 15 Intill Girard Av & Frankford Av)
Sugar House Casino
Delaware Av & Penn St
Spring Garden Street
Callowhill & Riverfront
Race Street Pier
Market St
Walnut St
Spruce St
Christian St
Washington Ave
Tasker Ave
East Snyder Ave
IKEA Dr

(Branches Continue to Naval Yard and Stadiums)


Glassboro / Millville Branch
Walter Rand Transportation ctr
Cooper Hospital
Atlantic Ave
Gloucester City
Crown Point Road
Red Bank Ave
Cooper Street
Woodbury Heights
Wenonah
Mantra Boulevard
Sewell
Pitman
Rowan University
Glassboro
Clayton
Newfield
Oak Road
Landis Ave
Walnut Road
Route 55 Park / Ride
Broad Street
Main Street


Pennsville Light Rail
Walter Rand Transportation ctr
Cooper Hospital
Atlantic Ave
Gloucester City
Crown Point Road
Red Bank Ave
Cooper Street
North Delaware Street
Gibbtown
Bridgeport
Penns Grove
Cameys Point
Pennsville


Bridgeton Branch
Walter Rand Transportation ctr
Cooper Hospital
Atlantic Ave
Gloucester City
Crown Point Road
Red Bank Ave
Cooper Street
Woodbury Heights
Wenonah
Mantra Boulevard
Sewell
Pitman
Rowan University
Glassboro
Clayton
Newfield
Oak Road
Delsea Drive
Morton Ave
Rosenhayn Ave
Downtown Bridgeton

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-20-2012, 09:39 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
11,607 posts, read 8,293,688 times
Reputation: 3619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
All the more reason to allow an agency like Amtrak to take over inter-city service. Bring in somebody who has no skin in the game like SEPTA and the local governments do.
You mean like the Keystone Service. Amtrak is going to run the Lehigh & Lackawanna Services aside from some NJT service with the first stops in PA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-20-2012, 10:18 AM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,154 posts, read 730,686 times
Reputation: 594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
You mean like the Keystone Service. Amtrak is going to run the Lehigh & Lackawanna Services aside from some NJT service with the first stops in PA.
Something like this, and it should be done soon. It's ludicrous that the Lehigh Valley will get service to New York and not Philadelphia. That the Lehigh Valley should fall under New York's sphere of influence just goes to show how backwards and insular SEPTA has become. They're a small time city transit agency when what we need for suburban commuter service is a real railroad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-20-2012, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Montco PA
1,191 posts, read 1,750,028 times
Reputation: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
Something like this, and it should be done soon. It's ludicrous that the Lehigh Valley will get service to New York and not Philadelphia. That the Lehigh Valley should fall under New York's sphere of influence just goes to show how backwards and insular SEPTA has become. They're a small time city transit agency when what we need for suburban commuter service is a real railroad.
Ha! I'll agree with that. SEPTA is definitely backwards/insular/small time, when they could be so much more (kind of like Philadelphia in general).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 08-20-2012, 12:13 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,154 posts, read 730,686 times
Reputation: 594
Quote:
Originally Posted by BPP1999 View Post
Ha! I'll agree with that. SEPTA is definitely backwards/insular/small time, when they could be so much more (kind of like Philadelphia in general).
Well, SEPTA isn't bad as a city transit agency, they're just terrible at running a railroad. The two should have been run separately, but the state never wanted to fund rail through PENNDOT so they foisted it off on SEPTA to manage. Now SEPTA has been doing a better job lately, but that's not saying a whole lot given how low they set the bar for themselves in the 80s. It's why I don't think inter-urban service should be SEPTA's game. It's just not what they do best and if you want it done right, go with somebody you know will do it better. This is why I'd rather see Amtrak run interurban service, even if Amtrak is a national network not tied to Philadelphia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top