U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
Old 07-05-2013, 04:41 PM
Location: Kansas
19,187 posts, read 14,941,333 times
Reputation: 18247


#2 is "The Golden Rule" which I read exists in 8 of the major religions. It is a good rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 07-05-2013, 04:53 PM
Location: Pueblo - Colorado's Second City
12,173 posts, read 20,952,639 times
Reputation: 4258
Originally Posted by JrzDefector View Post
It occurs to me though that this approach doesn't really work if an individual is not at heart a functional person. Narcissists, sociopaths and people with personality disorders would find ways around these concepts.

Do you think that religions became so complex out of a need to keep the "deviant few" in line with logical social mores?
If someone is a sociopath nothing is going to help. I knew a guy who had things like a license plate that said respect life yet he lied to me for years and said he was gay when he was 100% straight. He did so without any thought on what he was doing to me and when I found out apologized for hurting me then did it even more till I finally stopped talking to him. Its a long story but my point is if someone is a sociopath nothing will keep him or her from hurting people. The best we can do is stay away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-05-2013, 05:20 PM
Location: USA
1,590 posts, read 1,724,025 times
Reputation: 1630
Originally Posted by JrzDefector View Post
I'm an atheist, but most people consider me to be extremely ethical and moral (to an annoying degree). As far as I can tell, I basically have built my secular personal code and guide my actions based on the two following questions:

1) Do my actions unnecessarily harm any humans, animals or institutions?

2) Am I behaving towards others the way I would want them to behave towards me?

I'm curious if anyone sees any holes in this - any other rules/principles that are necessary to being a good person.

That's how I do it also. Same two rules.

Although, what is "a good person"? Sometimes when you don't do enough good things to people, don' t go out of your way to do good things to people at the cost to yourself, don't sacrifice enough, you are not considered that good. But I guess that is obvious only when you have to live next to someone who always does something for others, always helps in some way.

So, in my own eyes, I am a good person. Because I live based on those two principles. But in my mom's eyes I probably would have to DO more in order to fit the category of a good person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top