Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2017, 10:24 AM
 
50,783 posts, read 36,486,545 times
Reputation: 76578

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Escort Rider View Post
Demographics and longevity are fascinating. It's quite possible that the number of centenarians will continue to grow at the same time that the average life span will decline. Obesity and lack of exercise are killing us in the aggregate but not all of us are obese and not all of us fail to exercise. Therefore the subset of the population that lives in healthy ways may continue to live longer, while the subset that doesn't will die sooner. It will be interesting to see to which side the overall numbers will tip us in the coming decades.

It is speculative whether exposure to toxins in the environment will have an increasing cumulative effect, as stated by one or two posters in this thread. To me they sound like Chicken Little. Just to take the example of lead: It was quite a few years ago that lead was banned as an additive in gasoline and also in paint. (Too lazy to look up the date of each). And how about DDT? Wasn't that banned in the 1960's? The worst period of time for toxic exposures among the general population may have passed decades ago.
There are still toxins, pollutants in the air. Asthma rates have increased significantly in the past decades. We still don't know why the rates of Alzhemiers and Autism continue to increase, however pesticides and environmental toxins are one possibility (there is now a link between ADD and pesticides as well). As the EPA and environmental regulations continue to decline, expect more of the same and worse. There are factories spewing chemicals into the air and water every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-24-2017, 11:42 AM
 
1,190 posts, read 1,026,621 times
Reputation: 1034
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannabeCPA View Post
I think I'll pass. That's a boat I don't want to be on. When I'm dead it's all over for me.
I wish that were true but don't believe it to be. You will be resurrected to live in one of two places.
The most important thing here on earth is to tell the truth to people so they have the chance to choose.
To live in truth even if it isn't what they want to hear.

But your version of the afterlife, if it was to be that way, isn't too shabby
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 02:29 PM
 
3,205 posts, read 2,623,562 times
Reputation: 8570
Quote:
Originally Posted by southwest88 View Post
100 years from now everyone who is on earth now will be dead.



Well, we're (the West, the US) getting closer & closer to techniques & methodology to upload data from biologicals to electronic storage. Whether that would be considered life or not, depends on your POV, I suppose. It certainly wouldn't be an exact duplicate of life in the flesh - but if you're an astronomer or geologist or planetologist, planetary ecologist or would-be terraformer, or any of the other disciplines that deal in long timelines, you'd be able to work for a very long time, & actually see some projects come to fruition.

It might be an exciting time to be alive, so to speak.

Of course, there would some details to work out - but that's kinda the thrill of it all, yes?
If you consider a data upload to a computer as being 'alive', I feel kind of bad for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 06:22 PM
 
7,727 posts, read 12,622,010 times
Reputation: 12406
No, we won't. Dead to the physical Earth but very much alive in the spiritual. The body dies. The souls moves to the afterlife. Whichever one that may be, Heaven or Hell, according to one's choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,931,928 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by allenk893 View Post
No, we won't. Dead to the physical Earth but very much alive in the spiritual. The body dies. The souls moves to the afterlife. Whichever one that may be, Heaven or Hell, according to one's choice.
You really think so? I mean... what Earthly (heh) reason would there be for making every human spend dozens of years 'alive', going through a random existence that might be pleasant, might be privileged, or not. Or racked from go with disease, poverty... abuse... only to 'die' and then... ... it doesn't make sense. It simply makes no sense! And what about my cat, Ernest? What about dogs? Horses? Ferrets? Budgerigars? Only humans get to cavort around in Eternity because you can't face Death like a mature adult? An Afterlife is a panacea for people that are WASTING the only life they are ever going to have denying themselves "earthly pleasures". Don't do that. Live dammit, live!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Missouri, USA
5,671 posts, read 4,352,826 times
Reputation: 2610
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman07 View Post
Crazy to think about right?
I'm going to still be alive through the species, so long as the species is still around. I already basically die every few seconds. I'll be a different person in the future than I am now. The rest of society will just be a little farther down the spectrum of that which I call I than the I that I refer to as the younger me, and the future older me.

I think that's kind of neat to think about. If I'm gone, but another human being exists who still sees the world similarly to how I see it exists, I'm basically still alive, in a sense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2017, 11:08 PM
 
2 posts, read 869 times
Reputation: 10
There is a case to be made that a child born today will live 1,000 years or more.
It goes like this: By the time that child reaches the age of 50, science will have progressed far enough that the diseases common to man will by and large be curable, extending that 50 to, perhaps 100 and healthy. In that second 50 years, science will have advanced apace and that child's life will be extended to perhaps 200 years. And then to 800 years, and so on, to what is essentially immortality.
Is it not, in a broadly logical sense, possible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 06:32 AM
 
13,496 posts, read 18,192,756 times
Reputation: 37885
100 years from now everyone who is on earth now will be dead.

I don't find this disturbing or interesting. It be that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
9,855 posts, read 11,931,928 times
Reputation: 10028
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadedith View Post
There is a case to be made that a child born today will live 1,000 years or more.
It goes like this: By the time that child reaches the age of 50, science will have progressed far enough that the diseases common to man will by and large be curable, extending that 50 to, perhaps 100 and healthy. In that second 50 years, science will have advanced apace and that child's life will be extended to perhaps 200 years. And then to 800 years, and so on, to what is essentially immortality.
Is it not, in a broadly logical sense, possible?
No, just no!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 06:14 PM
 
2 posts, read 869 times
Reputation: 10
Well, maybe. When I asked if it is possible in a 'broadly logical' sense - I think it is.
Would it be a good thing? I'm doubtful. There would be unforeseen consequences for sure; and what would a human DO with all those extra years? Would there be a flourishing of humanity, once the dreaded pall of mortality was lifted? Or would this forced 'evolution' just extend the lives and manner of life that we currently have?

What would YOU - whoever you are - do differently if you were given an 800 year lifespan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Philosophy

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top