![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
so I forgive you. From where I stand, FL, the business community deserves to be excoriated for many of it's practices including low wages across the board. Why do you think we have working homeless in St Pete? And I mean decent jobs, not day work or the most awful menial jobs around. Some of these people actually go to offices and have families but their willingness to work was not enough to counter the high cost of living here. The St. Pete Times recently did an article on how difficult it was for working people to get second jobs for the holiday season. A lot of people here bought houses when they were affordable and now have property taxes thru the roof due to assessments based on market value. The current gov. is trying to get that changed but he's meeting very stiff opposition from municipalities who went on a spending spree with all this extra tax money and would rather see their citizens on the street than tighten their municipal belts. The thing is they really don't want these folks on the street and paint them as "misfits" and are literally running them out of town. We haven't seen a merit based pay raise anywhere as one poster stated you have in PHX. It's hard to even get a cost of living increase. Most companies are "cost cutting" by "downsizing" and a few weeks later getting a Temp agency to send a full shift of temp-to-perm new hires who get no bennies and can be gone in an hour. Home Depot just closed a call center of 750 people. they decided "our bad, we overestimated need and this work can be done in-store." Decent hardworking people have no place to go. Some will become homeless. Great, Merry Christmas here's your 60 day notice. I'm waiting to see if HD was sincere about the need, it happens and I realize business decisions can be hard but if they dare open a call center off shore they will be proven to be bold faced liars. The Eastern Seaboard is dying. Cities can't regain their manufacturing base so to save themselves they are becoming "destinations" and creating low paying service jobs. For those they want cute, perky, young people and I understand that but if the profile doesn't fit, it doesn't fit. Sometimes wisdom comes thru others and only after we've spoken our frustrations. I can't say why we didn't look West long ago but the light has finally dawned. We were stupid and refused to accept our forward thinking spirits as a good thing. I've read hard things on this forum but they have been part of the growth process. I hope I never become too old for that. Someone posted that this wasn't the forum for me but I disagree. I am seriously interested in moving forward with my life and that means getting out of my East Coast "comfort zone." In the process I've found that it really hasn't been so comfortable. I never belonged here. joninaz, I think you were a bit too harsh but the things you said hit a nerve and I realize those very qualities I have been projecting are the very things I hate most about the East. Narrowness, judgementalness, just plain negative, negative, negative. Time to clean house. That doesn't mean abandoning values however, just have to figure out how to do both. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
[/quote]actually a very Jewish concept even if the terminology is different. I think of Judaism as an "Eastern" religion, not Greek, unless you''re Reform ![]() Just kidding, all you Reformers out there but you do like your Humanism and Rationalism. LOL |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Right to work state simply means, that you cannot be required to join a union to be able to work for a company
Unions are not strong here in Arizona - and, that is a good thing. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
jessiesma, first believe it or not--->home base for my employer is not the west. Home base is Cleveland to be exact. We have operations in numerous states, including Arizona and Florida and others (even Canada). I got a fully paid relocation out here to Phoenix at my request (I have family here)---->essentially and literally brought my job with me. I already knew the people in the Phoenix office, it is the same work I have been doing for years. That made the transition hugely easy!
As far as shift bidding, I dont think that will be an issue. My employer looks to people to be reasonable. Ie If you know that John is asking to not work a certain shift for religious reasons vs you dont want to work it simply because it would interfere with your car washing schedule--->they expect you to do the right thing and give John first choice. It is the corporate "culture" if you will. And it is supposed to be company wide-not limited to just the IT'ish folks. I will pm you later this evening. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
not sure who Greatday is replying to but I agree about unions. I just hate when unscrupulous people use "right to work" unethically, like no notice firing and not giving a work related reason. It usually works out to "right to fire." Unless the offense is so egregious the person presents a danger, that is just cruel. Used to be if someone was fired with no notice, you'd get severance pay. No more. It's meant to be a 2 way street, allowing an employee to quit with no strings attached although I'm not sure how that applies to the employee.
Last edited by jessiesma; 12-20-2007 at 01:59 PM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just wanted to make sure my position, regarding Unions, is clear - I oppose Unions. I don't believe in Unions. I believe that it is, in large measure, because of Unions that the United States has seen the amount of "outsourcing" the the reduction in competitivness in certain industries, that we have.
I trust the above clarifies my position |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Greatday,
That is an interesting idea. On what do you base it? I'm not contradicting you I just have seen a lot of outsourcing in unskilled jobs so how do unions (code for socialism) affect that? I mean is is an indirect outcome in areas like customer service and retail or is there some direct connection like demands for high wages etc. etc.? What can we do about it if anything? So you are saying that "right to work" is supposed to be limited to not having to join a union which is somewhat irrelevant in a lot of jobs and it doesn't mean or shouldn't mean that an employer can fire you at will say, for staring out into space for a few seconds even tho doing so doesn't affect your work? Because that is the common understanding or excuse in these parts and no one will refute that. I've heard that it was meant to protect the worker in lieu of union protection but it has been totally turned against the worker and it may be because of a genuine but not malicious misunderstanding of the purpose of the, um, is it a law? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
What type of engineering degree does your husband have?
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |