U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 07-04-2008, 12:25 PM
Arizona Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
3,460 posts, read 4,018,796 times
Reputation: 727
sablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to beholdsablebaby is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle2k1 View Post

Every person I have ever met has complained about the speed cameras, and anyone online there is usually only about 1 person out of 30 other psoting that agrees with the cameras.
My question is, why are they still into effect if there is what seems to be for sure more then half the people in the state are against them( maybe some cities the peoples general outlooks arent and my finding are biased?). Isnt there steps to take to demand a repeal of a law or to make a law as long as X amount of people sign a petition? Wonder why noone has ever done this.... I don't have the time for it but there are plenty of people of people that have all the time in the world( which actually alot of the time synchronizes with the people that are the "just don't speed" crowd.... hello, cant you see through others perspective? We understand you have absolutly no hurry in your life because your retired/not working, but most people in the real world do )
There are lots of us here who think the cameras are a good thing. I also know a lot of people outside of this forum who don't care either way, or like them. They are pretty easy to get past without a ticket, I don't know why people complain about them so much. And, I certainly don't drive like a turtle. I'm pretty speedy and I don't get tickets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2008, 05:12 PM
Helping others help themselves...
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
10,142 posts, read 3,220,865 times
Reputation: 6352
nitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond repute
nitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond reputenitram has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by sablebaby View Post
There are lots of us here who think the cameras are a good thing. I also know a lot of people outside of this forum who don't care either way, or like them. They are pretty easy to get past without a ticket, I don't know why people complain about them so much. And, I certainly don't drive like a turtle. I'm pretty speedy and I don't get tickets.
Maybe that's because you're a responsible driver.....scroll down
















or you just haven't been caught yet...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2008, 05:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Central Phoenix
1,484 posts, read 991,313 times
Reputation: 840
Valley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by sablebaby View Post
There are lots of us here who think the cameras are a good thing. I also know a lot of people outside of this forum who don't care either way, or like them. They are pretty easy to get past without a ticket, I don't know why people complain about them so much. And, I certainly don't drive like a turtle. I'm pretty speedy and I don't get tickets.
The ones who favor them, or those who will accept them without any kind of thought, are the sheep who obviously don't realize that this is clearly a form of Big Brother out of control. The main issue is: this isn't even about safety! It's about the government collecting more revenue. The state is currently in a serious budget deficit, and they want the public to contribute to their coffers. DUH! Can't anybody see how obvious this is?! Napolitano even admitted it (in so many words) in her support for the radar cameras.

Hell, with the support these cameras are getting, why stop with the freeways? Why not put cameras in our cars to make sure we're not talking on our phones or dozing off behind the wheel? Why not put them in our homes too? Is that what you want??? If you allow the government to put robotized revenue generators on the roads, it won't be long before they want to put cameras in other aspects of your personal lives, such as your homes & vehicles.

I'm writing this on the Fourth of July ... a day that we should be standing up for our freedoms, not giving them away. If our founding fathers could only see how we've allowed Big Brother to be our nannies, they would be flopping over in their graves!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2008, 07:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
5 posts, read 13,382 times
Reputation: 12
kyle2k1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post
The ones who favor them, or those who will accept them without any kind of thought, are the sheep who obviously don't realize that this is clearly a form of Big Brother out of control. The main issue is: this isn't even about safety! It's about the government collecting more revenue. The state is currently in a serious budget deficit, and they want the public to contribute to their coffers. DUH! Can't anybody see how obvious this is?! Napolitano even admitted it (in so many words) in her support for the radar cameras.

Hell, with the support these cameras are getting, why stop with the freeways? Why not put cameras in our cars to make sure we're not talking on our phones or dozing off behind the wheel? Why not put them in our homes too? Is that what you want??? If you allow the government to put robotized revenue generators on the roads, it won't be long before they want to put cameras in other aspects of your personal lives, such as your homes & vehicles.

I'm writing this on the Fourth of July ... a day that we should be standing up for our freedoms, not giving them away. If our founding fathers could only see how we've allowed Big Brother to be our nannies, they would be flopping over in their graves!
The truth!

It was in the news a while back, one of the cities in AZ raised its time that that the yellow light was on for.The result was extremely less violations and less accidents. Less violations meant less money, so the camera makers yelled at the city for breaching their contract and they arent getting enough money, so the city put the yellow back to normal and also raised the amount going to the company to I beleive $75 per ticket.

Many cities have done studies that found any difference with red light camera or without, safety wise, negligable or even worse. Many cities have also voted to ban them because theywere proven as such and also as unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2008, 08:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Central Phoenix
1,484 posts, read 991,313 times
Reputation: 840
Valley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to beholdValley Native is a splendid one to behold
Kyle, I agree with your sentiment against the cameras. I'm also in full agreement with your statements on how there has been NO VOTE BY THE PUBLIC on this matter. The mere fact that cameras even exist on certain highways came from people like our "wonderful Governor", certain members of the Legislature, and municipalities who see this as a cash cow. In fact, the city of Scottsdale installed the cameras on the Loop 101 illegally. The city has no jurisdiction to patrol the 101 because that is the job of DPS. Where is the outcry from citizens on this ... and more importantly, where is OUR vote???

And you're also correct that most of the people who support these cameras are the ones with little time on their hands. It's pretty evident in passing them on the freeways. They are the slowpokes who meander along in the center or left lanes, obviously clueless of the fact that they are impeding the flow of traffic (which is against Arizona law, BTW) and causing road rage among other drivers. Those drivers obviously need to stay off the freeways, and quit crying to the government to slow down everyone else who use the roads to GET SOMEWHERE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2008, 03:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
3 posts, read 9,757 times
Reputation: 10
kmn280 is on a distinguished road
I heard that AZ governement passed a law last week stating that Photo Radar tickets will not go on your record (driving?) and you can not recieve points for photo radar tickets? Has anyone else heard this and how will it effect its enforcement?

Apparently the reason for this is the Governor believes more tickets will be paid if there is no worry about it going on the driving record. Also that it will bring down the jursidictions expenses on court hearings and serving individuals?


Any comment?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2008, 03:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
3,170 posts, read 1,021,766 times
Reputation: 1016
azriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud ofazriverfan. has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmn280 View Post
I heard that AZ governement passed a law last week stating that Photo Radar tickets will not go on your record (driving?) and you can not recieve points for photo radar tickets? Has anyone else heard this and how will it effect its enforcement?

Apparently the reason for this is the Governor believes more tickets will be paid if there is no worry about it going on the driving record. Also that it will bring down the jursidictions expenses on court hearings and serving individuals?


Any comment?
My wife got a photo radar ticket and it certainly went on her record and raised her points. I heard the same rumor and told her it wouldn't raise her insurance. I was wrong. Likewise, I wouldn't believe this rumor either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2008, 03:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix!!!!
1,183 posts, read 843,717 times
Reputation: 355
Rick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really niceRick Lee is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmn280 View Post
I heard that AZ governement passed a law last week stating that Photo Radar tickets will not go on your record (driving?) and you can not recieve points for photo radar tickets? Has anyone else heard this and how will it effect its enforcement?

Apparently the reason for this is the Governor believes more tickets will be paid if there is no worry about it going on the driving record. Also that it will bring down the jursidictions expenses on court hearings and serving individuals?


Any comment?
Yeah, my comment is that it's further proof that these radar cameras are all about money and have NOTHING to do with safety. If running a red light or speeding are real safety issues, then the tickets very much SHOULD go on one's record. Plenty of folks can afford the fines and not worry about it. But start racking up points or take an insurance hit for three years per violation and that tends to get people's attention. Not issuing points is the state's way of encouraging sheeple to just roll over and pay and not try to fight it. I can promise the state that I will fight even a $1 ticket if I get one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2008, 06:02 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
3 posts, read 9,757 times
Reputation: 10
kmn280 is on a distinguished road
Well this law was passed June 28.

Here is the article from a news station in Pheonix: Photo Radar Tickets Won't Appear On Records - Phoenix News Story - KPHO Phoenix
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2008, 06:24 PM
Not a member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois
108 posts, read 89,257 times
Reputation: 28
EventHorizon is on a distinguished road
I heard that the photo resistant covers for license plates are illegal... So I heard about a clear product that you spray on to your license plate and it bloks the camera. Does anyone know about this? Is it legal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top