![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Link to the other thread:Photo Radar questions |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, I called channel 12 news and spoke to Dave Cherry.
He did a story on this topic and he said that the phot radar "tickets" you receive in the mail are not tickets at all. No matter how they look or read they are a document asking you to waive your rights to be served in person. If you respond to the "ticket" by sending it in or even by going on line and looking up your photo on their website which 95% of people do, you have been served and have waived your right to be served in person. Dave said since i live out of state chances of me being served out of state are extremely slim. If you are not served in person within 120 days from the incident(s) the "tickets" are dismissed as though they never have happened. Now as for some of the people saying the photo radar is obvious. Maybe it is to residents, but I dont think it is to out of towners. I was issued 3 tickets for going 77 in a 65, two were 77mph an one was 79mph. I don't argue that i was speeding but i do argue the fact that with 2 of the tickets only being 57 seconds apart thats not fair. Who would get a ticket and then speed off again right after then speed again on the way back? I would have paid the first ticket but the court system says all 3 are valid so now I will ignore them and hopefully they will be dismissed after the 120 days. If anyone does not believe this please call Dave Cherry at news channel 12 in Phoenix. He has done this story with police and Laywers. Thank You. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well hard to doubt Dave Cherry but my husband got his license suspended here for a ticket he got in California he blew off. He had to fly to California to solve the problem then come back here and reapply for his license again. Lesson learned. Maybe you should just respect the law when you visit other states from now on and then you won't have to worry about it. I bet you speed all the way home too! I do feel sorry for a lot of cops trying to stop speeders with attitude. The cameras allow them to address real criminals and let technology give out the "stop speeding idiot, you might kill someone" warnings! You might want to be careful these days, someone might taze you for speeding, that is what you should be worrying about.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Napolitano has optimistic budget for 2009 Several of the governor's ideas seem overly ambitious. ● Generating new revenue with enhanced photo radar enforcement on highways, with the money going to the Department of Public Safety. Lead-foot drivers are expected to generate about $90 million. Napolitano has optimistic budget for 2009 | www.azstarnet.com ® |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Oops... just saw your last post. Last edited by mdtoaz; 01-23-2008 at 10:48 AM. Reason: jumped the gun |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Say Cheese!!" next to it. ![]() Even though speding is a problem and is illegal, I believe lack of using turn signals, illegal/incorrect lane changing or left turns and not obeying the stop signs or running red lights are much bigger and more important issues than speeding here in Phoenix. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
[mod] orphaned [mod]
Speaking of 101, there is a stretch of a few miles around the 51 that is posted 45 MPH because of construction. But everyone ignores it and goes 65. I go with the traffic; if I were to go 45 I'd get run off the road. There's three clear lanes in each direction; the shoulders are narrowed by jersey barriers. During morning rush hour it's more like 55 anyway. The question is, am I risking getting a photo radar ticket for 20mph over the speed limit? If the road conditions are normal, why do they even post such a low speed limit to begin with, that no one's going to respect anyway? Last edited by sablebaby; 01-23-2008 at 02:06 PM. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In many cases, if not all, the fines DOUBLE for violations in a Construction Zone! Definitely not worth the risk. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sometimes it just isn't worth the risk! |
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|