Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-20-2017, 08:27 PM
 
4,235 posts, read 14,063,176 times
Reputation: 4253

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan. View Post
I don't really understand the thinking here. Downtown Mesa is still lacking in development and pales in comparison to downtown Chandler and Gilbert in terms of restaurants, night life and development. Downtown Mesa also has a lot of crime and it's adjacent to blighted areas. High rise apartments or buildings are typically expensive due to the construction costs. I fail to understand why anyone with money would invest in those apartments when they can invest elsewhere.

hmmmm.....exact same thing was said about downtown Phoenix 15 years ago.....and Chandler.....and Gilbert......and Glendale.......(and Tempe 30 years ago)

if I had some backers, I'd be grabbing every square foot of downtown Mesa right now while the gettin' is good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2017, 01:46 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,265,438 times
Reputation: 9835
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan. View Post
That doesn't make sense because it's much more expensive to build a modern high building hence the reason those units are expensive. Normally that works in dense areas that are in demand and in which people earn a good income (San Francisco), it won't work in Mesa. Unless downtown Mesa create a lot of local high paying jobs, cleans up the area and provide bars, restaurants and other local amenities, they aren't going to attract a lot of demand to pay $$$ for a high rise unit.
Nowadays, 15 story buildings are NOT considered highrises. You're starting to sound like the pathetic NIMBYs that both you and I have always balked at. Why are you on their side now?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG CATS View Post
One of the biggest suburbs in the entire country and we're excited over a 15 story building? I hope people from other cities don't read this forum, its embarrassing. Only in the Valley do we get stoked over tiny "highrises". hahaha
Well said! Mesa should be building up its central core because of the fact that it's a sizeable city on its own, not to mention one of the nation's largest suburbs. Tempe has been able to build upward with 20 & 30 story buildings, so I don't see why Mesa can't as well. You're right that it is pretty embarrassing when we get excited over MIDRISE buildings. Even in downtown Phoenix, a good share of the newer developments are under 20 stories, and people seem to be fine with that kind of small townish architecture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
5,649 posts, read 5,966,125 times
Reputation: 8317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native View Post



Well said! Mesa should be building up its central core because of the fact that it's a sizeable city on its own, not to mention one of the nation's largest suburbs. Tempe has been able to build upward with 20 & 30 story buildings, so I don't see why Mesa can't as well. You're right that it is pretty embarrassing when we get excited over MIDRISE buildings. Even in downtown Phoenix, a good share of the newer developments are under 20 stories, and people seem to be fine with that kind of small townish architecture.
Its the "something is better than nothing" mentality that permeates the PHX forum, making us sound pathetic. No major city should EVER get excited over such miniscule projects. Bringing in small, low-capacity apartments and condos to gargantuan cities like PHX and Mesa shouldn't even be mentioned. Why? That's the NORM elsewhere. No reason to get excited about that crap here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 12:16 PM
 
Location: northwest valley, az
3,424 posts, read 2,919,706 times
Reputation: 4919
I wonder if its the fact that the really deep and super strong foundations required for really tall buildings cant be done in this area, because of whats underground...
I'm no engineer, so I am just speculating, but a 50 story tower in downtown phoenix would be kewl!
Although I would hate to see the electricity bill!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 01:39 PM
 
Location: AriZona
5,229 posts, read 4,611,960 times
Reputation: 5509
Quote:
Originally Posted by wase4711 View Post
I wonder if its the fact that the really deep and super strong foundations required for really tall buildings cant be done in this area, because of whats underground...
I'm no engineer, so I am just speculating, but a 50 story tower in downtown phoenix would be kewl!
Although I would hate to see the electricity bill!!
I would think that in a so-called landlocked state like Arizona, complete with that awful new word (CALICHE) that noobies continually discover when they come here to dig us, all manner of 50-plus story buildings would be able to be built. What is caliche

I dunno what kind of slippery slopes they build skyscrapers on over there in New York, Chicago, San Fran, etc, but it seems to me that places which have always been surrounded by water, sand and wastewater dump sites -- just can't be the most ideal sites to build those big, tall things.

Please correct an Arizonan if he's wrong...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 02:20 PM
 
Location: northwest valley, az
3,424 posts, read 2,919,706 times
Reputation: 4919
here's how its done in Chicago for now..I assume the same could be done in AZ...

https://www.chipublib.org/blogs/post...il-1870s-1900/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
1,110 posts, read 1,379,685 times
Reputation: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG CATS View Post
Ill admit to standing out in the rain some nights.
I gotta Instagram the rain last night

On Topic:
What is the height restriction of building here in AZ? 15 storey is a low rise building. Back in my home country, new residential building can be as high 70 floors
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 02:50 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,265,438 times
Reputation: 9835
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG CATS View Post
Its the "something is better than nothing" mentality that permeates the PHX forum, making us sound pathetic. No major city should EVER get excited over such miniscule projects. Bringing in small, low-capacity apartments and condos to gargantuan cities like PHX and Mesa shouldn't even be mentioned. Why? That's the NORM elsewhere. No reason to get excited about that crap here.
Right! Start building 60 & 70 story skyscrapers in downtown Phoenix, and 30 story buildings in Mesa ... those would be worth mentioning! It's great that the downtown areas are attempting to bring in more residents & become more dense, but a few new 10 or 15 story buildings in the central core shouldn't be such a big deal in a city or metro area as big as this. It makes us look more like America's biggest small town rather than the fifth largest city.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wase4711 View Post
I wonder if its the fact that the really deep and super strong foundations required for really tall buildings cant be done in this area, because of whats underground...
I'm no engineer, so I am just speculating, but a 50 story tower in downtown phoenix would be kewl!
Although I would hate to see the electricity bill!!
It has nothing to do with the type of soil or the rock. It's mostly the stupid NIMBYs and the FAA pushing their height restrictions. A good example of this was about 10 years ago, there was a 39 story hotel tower proposed for downtown Phoenix, but it was scrapped mainly because a group of preservationists started a lawsuit over the location of the development ... it was supposed to be located on a supposed historical site. NIMBYs are generally against anything & everything that will disturb "their" tranquility, or block "their" sunshine & "their" mountain views. Most of them are pathetic losers who have nothing better to do than protest & attempt to get in the way of progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2017, 03:06 PM
 
525 posts, read 539,540 times
Reputation: 736
There have been tall skyscrapers proposed in the past; but financial costs scrapped all these projects.
The Chase tower is currently the tallest building in Arizona at 40 floors. I can't see Mesa ever getting a bunch of tall skyscrapers in downtown Mesa. That's never really been their vibe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top