U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.

Get a detailed profile of any city, county, or zip code:
      Search our forums (advanced):

Closed Thread

 
Old 10-19-2007, 11:53 AM
Taipan
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
11,690 posts, read 2,417,290 times
Reputation: 1219
Greatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
If you're so concerned about people's rights, why aren't you concerned about Arpaio's privacy being violated by the NY Times?
The New Times, by publishing the address, has directly impacted the safety of Sheriff Arpaio's wife and other family members.

They (New Times) were so wrong in doing that -

[+] Rate this post positively
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Arizona
3,609 posts, read 1,485,400 times
Reputation: 973
Bummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to beholdBummer is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
The New Times, by publishing the address, has directly impacted the safety of Sheriff Arpaio's wife and other family members.

They (New Times) were so wrong in doing that -
Great point, Greatday!

I'm not big on frequent and unwarranted lawsuits but this stunt definitely deserves a BIGGEE!

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:04 PM
Bullish on Kingman
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kingman, AZ
1,392 posts, read 538,082 times
Reputation: 752
kdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to beholdkdog is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by joninaz View Post
Why the hell does he want our IP addresses, records of what stoires, ads, sections we viewed, what other websites we visited, etc.?
See my previous response to Irwin. The reasonable explanation is that his lawyers simply want the web logs to tally a count of how many times the pages were viewed. Timestamps, IP addresses and the other information are standard fields in the web logs. It is pathologically paranoid to infer more nefarious motives behind the request.

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
14,376 posts, read 7,466,308 times
Reputation: 2972
Steve-o has a reputation beyond repute
Steve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond reputeSteve-o has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by joninaz View Post
For example, news outlets that write a negative story about his dept. get their access cut off. That's an insult to anyone who believes in the 1st Amendment.
Thats also his right. These news outlets should respect his requests. If they want to write negative about him, let them, thats their right. But if he disputes it, I feel he has the right to restrict them all he wants. Its not like they cant find another story to write about. He just doesnt want negative publicity. Who does?

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:22 PM
Dallas Cowboys!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surprise, Az
1,431 posts, read 712,815 times
Reputation: 259
ibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the rough
some of the Article that is on the AZ Republic right now...Read for yourself.

Quote:
The New Times subpoena originates from a series of articles published in 2004 and 2005. Underlying the subpoena is an allegation that the paper had published Arpaio's home address, which the County Attorney's Office alleges is a crime.

Moderator cut: do not repost copyrighted articles


[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by Yac; 12-14-2007 at 02:08 AM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:26 PM
Taipan
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
11,690 posts, read 2,417,290 times
Reputation: 1219
Greatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibarrio View Post
some of the Article that is on the AZ Republic right now...Read for yourself.
The arrest was for a alleged criminal violation by those at the New Times -

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:27 PM
Dallas Cowboys!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surprise, Az
1,431 posts, read 712,815 times
Reputation: 259
ibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the roughibarrio is a jewel in the rough
And what...Joe gets and his cronies get a pass? Read the article...

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 12:29 PM
Taipan
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
11,690 posts, read 2,417,290 times
Reputation: 1219
Greatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud ofGreatday has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibarrio View Post
And what...Joe gets and his cronies get a pass? Read the article...
I read the article - it is nothing more than a summary of the disputes over the last few years - no real new information

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 01:04 PM
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
1,489 posts, read 690,269 times
Reputation: 338
irwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the roughirwin is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
See my previous response to Irwin. The reasonable explanation is that his lawyers simply want the web logs to tally a count of how many times the pages were viewed. Timestamps, IP addresses and the other information are standard fields in the web logs. It is pathologically paranoid to infer more nefarious motives behind the request.
NONSENSE!

They don't just want the number of views on that one story but they want ALL PEOPLE who have viewed the website in the past years AND the other websites those people have viewed. That is absolutely ridicules. PERIOD.

Quit defending this hick. This is now a national story and Phoenix is the laughing stock of the country for throwing journalists in jail for reporting on Joe.

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2007, 01:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
562 posts, read 227,227 times
Reputation: 201
joninaz has a spectacular aura aboutjoninaz has a spectacular aura aboutjoninaz has a spectacular aura aboutjoninaz has a spectacular aura aboutjoninaz has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
Thats also his right. These news outlets should respect his requests. If they want to write negative about him, let them, thats their right. But if he disputes it, I feel he has the right to restrict them all he wants. Its not like they cant find another story to write about. He just doesnt want negative publicity. Who does?
That's his right? To deny media access? You are 100% wrong. He's a public figure in charge of a public agency which is supported by taxpayer money. I feel sorry for you if you think it's ok for public officials to hand pick who they'll allow access to public records.

[+] Rate this post positively
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Closed Thread


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads

Forum Jump