Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2009, 11:42 AM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,254,574 times
Reputation: 9831

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
That article is total fluff. You could have read the same drivel in each of the recessions of the last 40 years. When the current recession ends, as it will, the outskirts will once again blossom with new homes, shopping, schools and new residents. People want to live here and they want to live where they can have two car garage, a backyard, and a pool. That means growing out. It is not some developer plot - it is the free market.
The article is correct. One of the main causes of the current economic downturn was the collapse of the real estate market. The far flung suburbs that mushroomed seemingly overnight have been the hardest hit because that's where a large percentage of the foreclosures are. Those are the areas where many homes were purchased with sub prime loans ... so when people couldn't make the payments, they abandoned their houses, and the entire area suffered. The Phoenix metro area is too reliant on real estate/home construction, which is why we are feeling the harsh effects from this current recession more than some other parts of the country.

The problem with your attitude (and those who think like you in this respect) is that you generalize too much about why people move to the Phoenix metro area. Do you honestly think that all four million Valley residents want to live in the outskirts in a cookie cutter subdivision? I happen to know many natives and long term residents who would much rather live & work in a more centralized area. That's the true concept of the free market: you have a CHOICE. Some like to live in the outer suburbs, some like the rural environment, and others like the urban amenities. Just because you prefer the far flung 'burbs doesn't mean all of us have to be like you. That's not a free market ... that's more like dictatorship.

There has actually been an increased demand recently for building inward and upward ... a lot of that was related to the skyrocketing cost of fuel. Hence, that's why light rail was approved by the voters, and why it has been a success so far. That's why many highrise projects were planned in downtown Phoenix. Unfortunately, the overall economy has stalled or scrapped many of those projects. NIMBYs and their idiotic protests were another factor as to why some weren't built.

So the bottom line is: there will always be sprawl. We can't entirely stop it from happening, which is good news for you and those like you. However, at the same time, there is also more of a demand for urbanization, which will not be stopped either. Live and work where & how you choose. Not everybody has (or wants) a house in the distant suburbs with an enormous SUV in the garage. Different strokes for different folks is true diversity, and a true free market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2009, 01:08 PM
 
24 posts, read 77,819 times
Reputation: 23
Every area goes through sprawl growth on the outskirts. This article is nothing original. People want to go where they can afford to buy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2009, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,330,688 times
Reputation: 21891
My thought is that the majority of people want a home of their own with a front and back yard, maybe a pool, a 2 or more car garage and plenty of space for them and their family. Living in a high rise building or sharing a wall with someone else isn't traditionally something that someone in the state wants. The majority will settle for a 6,000 suare foot lot with a home on it then move to the center of the valley to live in a box in a high rise building. If that lot is an hour away from the center of things, many still have what they expect out of life and are willing to make the sacrifice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2009, 01:49 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,254,574 times
Reputation: 9831
Quote:
Originally Posted by SOON2BNSURPRISE View Post
My thought is that the majority of people want a home of their own with a front and back yard, maybe a pool, a 2 or more car garage and plenty of space for them and their family. Living in a high rise building or sharing a wall with someone else isn't traditionally something that someone in the state wants. The majority will settle for a 6,000 suare foot lot with a home on it then move to the center of the valley to live in a box in a high rise building. If that lot is an hour away from the center of things, many still have what they expect out of life and are willing to make the sacrifice.
Like I stated before, there are those who prefer this type of living, and others who don't. Not everybody wants a stucco house in a far flung suburban master planned community. There are some who wish to live in more of an urban environment, and that's why there have been an increase of infill type of developments in the last few years. There are even those who still wish to live out in the middle of nowhere in a ranch house away from a population center. It's called choice. The free market isn't skewed to one type of demographic ... hence, the name "FREE market".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2009, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
1,108 posts, read 3,320,435 times
Reputation: 1109
1 million in 1955 and 6.5 million in 2008 is for the all of AZ not Phoenix metro. The metro population right now is just over 4 million.

AZ's dependance on real estate cycles and speculation has been a problem for a long time. The result has been a plethora of low paying service jobs instead of a solid core of better paying jobs, an economy vulnerable to boom & bust cycles and profound lack of long term regional planning.

One can hope that this current crash will serve as wake up call for AZ to finally change direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2009, 08:14 PM
 
Location: East Central Phoenix
8,042 posts, read 12,254,574 times
Reputation: 9831
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Charles_ View Post
1 million in 1955 and 6.5 million in 2008 is for the all of AZ not Phoenix metro. The metro population right now is just over 4 million.
I noticed that in the article as well. You're right: Arizona has a population of 6.5 million, but Phoenix metro is around four million. Phoenix itself is just under 1.6 million ... which brings up another point: the city of Phoenix shouldn't have been allowed to expand so far north. In fact, I wouldn't have minded if the city limits stopped at the mountain preserve boundary where Squaw Peak (now Piestewa) is. This would have been roughly Northern Avenue. Anything north of that line could have formed separate municipalities & sprawled outward like real separate suburbs. That was actually talked about years ago, but never came to fruition. It would have allowed the city itself to grow more dense & upward, and perhaps have given the actual city of Phoenix a population of slightly over one million today.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Charles_ View Post
AZ's dependance on real estate cycles and speculation has been a problem for a long time. The result has been a plethora of low paying service jobs instead of a solid core of better paying jobs, an economy vulnerable to boom & bust cycles and profound lack of long term regional planning.

One can hope that this current crash will serve as wake up call for AZ to finally change direction.
You are 100% correct ... and this is something I've been preaching for a long time. I said in another thread that the Valley's business climate is actually very welcoming for entrepreneurs & large corporations to establish their HQs here due to the relatively low taxes and right to work (non union) atmosphere. Unfortunately, we seem to lack a talented, educated populace.

We can only hope we have learned our lesson, and that we need to diversify our economic base more. Unfortunately, based on some of the attitudes right here on this forum that sprawl and cheap land are good for the Valley, I have some doubts about this metro area becoming more globally competitive. As soon as everyone receives their share of the "stimulus package" from Messiah Obama, things will likely return to business as usual.
()
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2009, 01:06 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
768 posts, read 1,758,833 times
Reputation: 928
We recently took a ride around Queen Creek - and it was really scary. For every house with a "for sale" or "for rent" sign in the yard - there were five houses on the same block that were obviously deserted. Just because there are porch furniture or yard decorations - if you look closely - you see houses with cobwebs around the garage doors, stacks of newspapers on the porch, overgrown yards. It seemed like the more "for sale" signs the more out of state cars in the driveways. Some of the brand new developments were COMPLETELY empty. We were surprised at the lack of stores, gas stations, and roads.

Maybe the drive until you qualify wasn't such a great idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Arizona > Phoenix area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top