|

02-19-2009, 07:16 PM
|
|
Taipan
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
21,448 posts, read 7,722,107 times
Reputation: 2964
|
|
Photo Radar doing its job!
3 men arrested after driving 100mph+ on Valley freeways
Three Phoenix men were arrested by Arizona Department of Public Safety officers after photo enforcement cameras flashed them driving at more than 100 miles per hour.
3 men arrested after driving 100mph+ on Valley freeways
|
|

02-19-2009, 07:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Phoenix
1,972 posts, read 861,446 times
Reputation: 319
|
|
|
While I do not agree with the scameras, these guys deserved to be arrested. The cameras should be set at 85, the criminal speed limit, instead of ~75mph, this would catch the people who actually deserve to get tickets, I am a speeder, but I never dive more than 80 on local freeways.
|
|

02-20-2009, 12:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Central Phoenix
1,484 posts, read 979,758 times
Reputation: 840
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday
3 men arrested after driving 100mph+ on Valley freeways
Three Phoenix men were arrested by Arizona Department of Public Safety officers after photo enforcement cameras flashed them driving at more than 100 miles per hour.
3 men arrested after driving 100mph+ on Valley freeways
|
There is a huge problem with this concept. They were rightfully arrested ... BUT ... they weren't instantly pulled over by a police officer as they should have been. They were snapped by the cameras, and arrested LATER at their homes or their places of employment. Effective traffic enforcement would catch them in the act, and arrest them on the spot ... not later in the day.
Furthermore, Great Day, I have to wonder why you stated in another thread how opposed you are to banning cell phone usage while driving because it's an intrusive form of government ... yet you are all in favor of the speed cameras. Having stated that you teach defensive driving, I can't help but wonder if you are receiving extra compensation with the increased number of people in your classes who have received photo radar tickets.
|
|

02-20-2009, 07:36 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tempe. AZ
2,585 posts, read 1,158,879 times
Reputation: 552
|
|
|
Chasing these guys at 100 MPH? We've seen what happens in those kind of chases.
I know there are issues with the cameras, but frankly, I don't much care about how people who drive like those three get caught.
Never more than 80 on local freeways??? Please. As far as I'm concerned, that, too, is excessive, and cars or cameras are free to catch those, too.
|
|

02-20-2009, 10:26 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
147 posts, read 107,912 times
Reputation: 40
|
|
|
good job DPS, how about next time we focus on real problems, like a child rapist walking out the front doors of the courthouse!!! get real.
|
|

02-20-2009, 10:35 AM
|
|
Photographing Arizona
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kingman, AZ
2,845 posts, read 1,955,110 times
Reputation: 1960
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbean
good job DPS, how about next time we focus on real problems, like a child rapist walking out the front doors of the courthouse!!! get real.
|
Is there supposed to be some sort of connection there? 
|
|

02-20-2009, 12:33 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tempe. AZ
2,585 posts, read 1,158,879 times
Reputation: 552
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbean
good job DPS, how about next time we focus on real problems, like a child rapist walking out the front doors of the courthouse!!! get real.
|
DPS does not patrol the courthouse. The escape in question was thanks to the wonderful minions of Sheriff Joe.
Back to Topic.
|
|

02-20-2009, 12:36 PM
|
|
Taipan
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
21,448 posts, read 7,722,107 times
Reputation: 2964
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valley Native
Furthermore, Great Day, I have to wonder why you stated in another thread how opposed you are to banning cell phone usage while driving because it's an intrusive form of government ...
|
I never said that. What I said was, banning cell phones while driving was, as a practical matter, unenforceable.
As for the case instant - it would be nice to have enough law enforcement officers to patrol every mile, on every freeway and street. But, again as a practical matter, this is not possible.
|
|

02-20-2009, 04:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Phoenix
1,972 posts, read 861,446 times
Reputation: 319
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by observer53
Never more than 80 on local freeways??? Please. As far as I'm concerned, that, too, is excessive, and cars or cameras are free to catch those, too.
|
80 is the average speed on the 101 in the fast lane, unless there is drivers who think they rule the road and block the fast lane.
|
|

02-20-2009, 06:50 PM
|
|
Taipan
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
21,448 posts, read 7,722,107 times
Reputation: 2964
|
|
|
80 in a 55 may be classified as a felony.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|