|

08-16-2009, 05:33 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
3,203 posts, read 1,054,867 times
Reputation: 1030
|
|
|
I can't stand Joe supporters or haters. Joe supporters exaggerate and accuse anyone critical of the Sheriff of supporting open borders or amnesty for illegals. And the Joe haters accuse him of only being a showboat who doesn't do anything.
Like with anything in life, the truth is often in the middle. The reality is both sides are right. Joe is an egomaniac who wastes tax payers dollars showboating. But Joe is also a determined Sherriff who has kept this county safe by actually enforcing the law. And let's be honest, Joe showboats and has cost this county millions in lawsuits. He also racially profiles. That being said, I don't think racially profiling is necessarily racist. Sorry but the statistics don't lie. African Americans and Hispanics make up a small percentage of the U.S. population but make up a far larger percentage of the criminal population in this country. So when a higher percentage of your racial population commits crimes, people are naturally going to start investigating your people. And I don't see anything wrong with that. It's one thing to mistreat someone who has proven to be innocent due to their race and it's another thing entirely to run someone's plates and investigate potential criminals. Police work isn't an objective science. Much of it is based on instinct and police officers are allowed to use their instinct and judgement to address crime. Unfortunately, I think it's a double standard to ask officers to use their instincts and judgement yet they have to be politcally correct at the same time??
I don't care if you support or oppose Joe. Just quit the stupid games and call it like it is. If you oppose Joe because he is racially profiling and is arrogant, fine I get that but then don't make up b.s. about him not doing his job because he is doing his job even if he simultaneously wastes money showboating. Likewise if you support Joe, don't accuse Joe opponents for loving open borders and illegal immigration. You are intelligent enough to know they don't support that but oppose Joe for his personality and approach to crime.
It's like the healthcare debate. Most Americans agree that reform needs to take place but we don't agree on how that reform should be administered. Likewise, I think most Arizonans agree that illegal immigration needs to be curtailed but people differ on how it should be addressed.
Last edited by azriverfan.; 08-16-2009 at 05:59 AM..
|
|

08-16-2009, 11:20 AM
|
|
Dallas Cowboys!!!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surprise, Az
2,071 posts, read 1,863,675 times
Reputation: 526
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan.
I can't stand Joe supporters or haters. Joe supporters exaggerate and accuse anyone critical of the Sheriff of supporting open borders or amnesty for illegals. And the Joe haters accuse him of only being a showboat who doesn't do anything.
Like with anything in life, the truth is often in the middle. The reality is both sides are right. Joe is an egomaniac who wastes tax payers dollars showboating. But Joe is also a determined Sherriff who has kept this county safe by actually enforcing the law. And let's be honest, Joe showboats and has cost this county millions in lawsuits. He also racially profiles. That being said, I don't think racially profiling is necessarily racist. Sorry but the statistics don't lie. African Americans and Hispanics make up a small percentage of the U.S. population but make up a far larger percentage of the criminal population in this country. So when a higher percentage of your racial population commits crimes, people are naturally going to start investigating your people. And I don't see anything wrong with that. It's one thing to mistreat someone who has proven to be innocent due to their race and it's another thing entirely to run someone's plates and investigate potential criminals. Police work isn't an objective science. Much of it is based on instinct and police officers are allowed to use their instinct and judgement to address crime. Unfortunately, I think it's a double standard to ask officers to use their instincts and judgement yet they have to be politcally correct at the same time??
I don't care if you support or oppose Joe. Just quit the stupid games and call it like it is. If you oppose Joe because he is racially profiling and is arrogant, fine I get that but then don't make up b.s. about him not doing his job because he is doing his job even if he simultaneously wastes money showboating. Likewise if you support Joe, don't accuse Joe opponents for loving open borders and illegal immigration. You are intelligent enough to know they don't support that but oppose Joe for his personality and approach to crime.
It's like the healthcare debate. Most Americans agree that reform needs to take place but we don't agree on how that reform should be administered. Likewise, I think most Arizonans agree that illegal immigration needs to be curtailed but people differ on how it should be addressed.
|
So Joe's job is to raid county building and seize computers by force? And on top of that defy a judges order to return them? So what you are implying is that as long as Joe does his job, who cares if he breaks the law? Which he did in this case...No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
|
|

08-16-2009, 12:59 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arizona
2,051 posts, read 1,365,609 times
Reputation: 519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa
I wonder what happens when a sheriff refuses to obey a court order and is found in contempt. Does DPS arrest him? It could get interesting next week.
|
lol i'd love to see that. 
|
|

08-16-2009, 01:48 PM
|
|
Respected Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: One of happiest states in US
4,406 posts, read 3,894,221 times
Reputation: 1182
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibarrio
So Joe's job is to raid county building and seize computers by force? And on top of that defy a judges order to return them? So what you are implying is that as long as Joe does his job, who cares if he breaks the law? Which he did in this case...No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
|
I think they have been given till Wednesday to comply or face contempt. By then he will have whatever he is looking for on the machine and have deleted anything that he does not want others to see.
|
|

08-16-2009, 02:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
17 posts, read 8,274 times
Reputation: 19
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa
I think they have been given till Wednesday to comply or face contempt. By then he will have whatever he is looking for on the machine and have deleted anything that he does not want others to see.
|
I should hope the county backed everything up.
I'm not expecting much, nothing ever sticks to the man.
|
|

08-17-2009, 09:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Anchored in Phoenix
560 posts, read 260,603 times
Reputation: 255
|
|
|
AzRiverfan,
It's not always the case that the truth is somewhere in the middle. This may be such a case. Sheriff Joe could either be an evil guy or a saint. I am tired of people who say there are no black and whites. They make a logical fallacy by that one statement alone ("There are no black and whites", or "there are no absolutes.").
The act of compromise got us the Congress that we have today, for example. I do not think there can be any compromise between individual liberty and the the nanny state.
|
|

08-18-2009, 01:38 PM
|
|
Respected Contributor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: One of happiest states in US
4,406 posts, read 3,894,221 times
Reputation: 1182
|
|
Arpaio Blinks
For all you out of towners who follow the saga(s) of Joe: Arpaio agreed to give up the password instead of being held in contempt of court in a compromise that will provide for auditing of the activities of the civilian IT employees who manage his server.
|
|

08-19-2009, 05:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
67 posts, read 55,098 times
Reputation: 33
|
|
|
I support Joe, especially if he continues his quest to get rid of the illegals who are making my getting a green card take so damn long.
|
|

08-19-2009, 08:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
74 posts, read 33,449 times
Reputation: 26
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelcork
I support Joe, especially if he continues his quest to get rid of the illegals who are making my getting a green card take so damn long.
|
How? 
|
|

08-19-2009, 08:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Downtown Phoenix
3,392 posts, read 1,472,918 times
Reputation: 556
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebelcork
I support Joe, especially if he continues his quest to get rid of the illegals who are making my getting a green card take so damn long.
|
Joe is doing nothing to rid us of illegals. He is raiding factories to arrest and hold 100 people from working to catch 4 illegals. Instead he should be assisting the city of Phoenix in catching 50 illegal desert trekkers, coyotes, drug smugglers in one swoop from sneaking across unincorporated Maricopa county land that could lead to catching 50 more here, 50 more there, and another 50 "kidnapped" in a house via leads and information gathered from the arrested. His stunts are just smoke and mirrors like always to fool voters and the gullible! If he was a true lawman he would help track down these people and secure county by land making it nearly impossible for illegals to get to central and northern Arizona. Doing this would catch thousand of illegals instead of a few.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|