Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
2goldens - the post on the contest said "plants or animals in their natural habitat". Are animals included or this is purely plants? Need clarification please!
2goldens - the post on the contest said "plants or animals in their natural habitat". Are animals included or this is purely plants? Need clarification please!
Animals are fine, but the emphasis needs to and should be on the plant life.
Sorry I saw this was directed for 2goldens, hope my answer is sufficient.
I realize this photo was captured before the start date, but using it as an example for clarification of the subject, would it be considered acceptable since the natural habitat is barely visible? I shot this Southern Yellow Pine tree in a field nearby my home in the Upstate of South Carolina:
For more information about this photo, click here (http://www.flickr.com/photos/24638974@N06/3000126454/ - broken link).
Ummm.... this is a challenging topic. Very interesting topic, Matt Angry. I'm guessing I'll be out of this one... since I'm pretty much gonna be stuck in my natural habitat! Good Luck to all who participate.
A real question: Say, would the trees growing in a small thicket in a nearby subdivision count? I mean, they have been there all their lives, so it's their natural habitat, right? The hills were full of them before 'progress'. The houses were built after we killed their kin... Would a photo of those trees be acceptable?
This is hard Matt! I don't know if I could drive far enough to some place to shoot flora in its natural habitat. If there were any, they're probably all shrivelled up at this point!
A real question: Say, would the trees growing in a small thicket in a nearby subdivision count? I mean, they have been there all their lives, so it's their natural habitat, right? The hills were full of them before 'progress'. The houses were built after we killed their kin... Would a photo of those trees be acceptable?
Sure it would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bibit612
This is hard Matt! I don't know if I could drive far enough to some place to shoot flora in its natural habitat. If there were any, they're probably all shrivelled up at this point!
It being hard is what makes it fun. Challenge yourself, try something new.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Though our ducks stay year-round, but survive much on "human generosity".
Good Luck to all who participate. 
Clarify please...
