Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-29-2013, 01:25 PM
 
3,488 posts, read 8,220,866 times
Reputation: 3972

Advertisements

Would you alter your photos if you were unhappy with how you look in them?

I am really struggling to lose weight after having our baby girl and this is starting to become an issue for me. For example yesterday we took some cute pictures of me/ us and the baby with some of the beautiful blossoming trees. I find that I like the pictures a lot less because I am focussing on my arm fat and chin.
I guess I'm just feeling a bit insecure about my post baby body and I'm taking less photos with me in them which isn't good.

So should I just suck it up and take the photos fat arms or no? Or is editing pictures acceptable?
There's one in particular from yesterday that I really like of me and the baby that I would like to retouch.

How does one do this? Do you need photoshop? Is there somewhere you can email the file to have someone do it for a fee? I feel like there should be an app for this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-29-2013, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Zebulon, NC
2,275 posts, read 6,307,927 times
Reputation: 3622
I would never alter them. You're recording a moment in time, and it should be a truthful moment.

I recently read an excellent article on the subject. So you're feeling too fat to be photographed
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2013, 10:13 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,827,501 times
Reputation: 14126
Almost every glamour shot that you see in magazines is touched up, so why shouldn't yours be as well? Most amateur photographers have no clue how to pick lighting, camera angles and poses that are flattering to imperfect (real) people. So touching them up can help take the focus off the imperfections and onto the more important elements in the shot. An even better idea is to hire a competent professional photographer to take better pictures. But even then touchups are pretty much the norm these days in professional photography.

There are all manners of software tools and products for retouching photos. Photoshop contains the mechanisms for retouching, but it's an artform in itself and takes tons of practice and repetition to get good at it. Poorly performed touchups will transform an unflattering photo to making you look like an alien. There are specialized programs which make quick work of editing faces (See Nomadicus' recent post). However I've never seen a program that automates editing bodies. Photoshop liquify tool is really good for that, but takes a bit of skill to do effectively.

Google photo-retouching and you will find countless services where you can send your photo to get touched up. I have no recommendations as I do all my own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2013, 10:50 PM
 
Location: West Cobb County, GA (Atlanta metro)
9,191 posts, read 33,883,354 times
Reputation: 5311
I'm 50/50 on it. I have no problem cloning out a zit or bruise or even an ugly tattoo on someone if I'm post-editing it for them, (or a photo of myself), but I don't think I would completely alter the body to the point where I looked 50lbs lighter.

In other words, I personally see no harm in some "Virtual Botox", or virtual heavier makeup... but not major plastic surgery. ;-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlantagreg30127 View Post
I'm 50/50 on it. I have no problem cloning out a zit or bruise or even an ugly tattoo on someone if I'm post-editing it for them, (or a photo of myself), but I don't think I would completely alter the body to the point where I looked 50lbs lighter.

In other words, I personally see no harm in some "Virtual Botox", or virtual heavier makeup... but not major plastic surgery. ;-)
These are my thoughts on the subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 08:02 AM
 
9,196 posts, read 24,938,023 times
Reputation: 8585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobokenkitchen View Post
How does one do this? Do you need photoshop?
Potrait Professional can do a nice (or horrid) job on faces to smooth skin and reshape a face to adjust weight and age issues.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Bend, OR
3,296 posts, read 9,688,776 times
Reputation: 3343
I recently stumbled across this blog post and it's worthy of a read. Allison Tate: The Mom Stays in the Picture
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2013, 09:52 PM
 
Location: Wyoming
9,724 posts, read 21,233,609 times
Reputation: 14823
As a portrait photographer I'm asked that now and then. I recommend against it but am happy to do it for paying customers. I did a big family reunion picture last year with around 40 people in it. I also broke out each family (6 sisters with their families plus mom/dad) into smaller groups, so it was a rushed deal (photos before dinner), and I didn't do the best job in posing some of them.

In the big group, each family picked a color to wear so they could easily be identified as members of that family. Not knowing any better, the largest sister picked white for her family. In a sea of colors and a background of dark green pines, white stands out! To make matters worse, she was wearing a short-sleeved blouse. And as if that wasn't enough, with most in the group partially hidden by others, she sat on the arm of a bench next to her tiny, skinny little sister. I should have seen it and altered her pose, but in the rush to get them photographed so they could get back to partying, I didn't.

But I sure saw it when looking over the digital proofs. She did too! She hated it. So I got out my liposuction tool (Photoshop) and went to work, darkening the white blouse and trimming the size from a 20 to a 14. She was delighted, mom was happy that her daughter was happy, and I was happy to sell $2500 worth of prints. I didn't do enough Photoshopping that anyone else would notice, but it was enough to make her look better.

Again, I don't recommend it. But I'll happily do it for any client who asks. This isn't news photography; it's photography for hire. And if I can do it for others, you can do it for yourself. Just don't make it obvious. Subtlety is the rule. You don't want anyone to notice, so don't carve away so many pounds that people ask if you've been on a diet. You don't want to have to explain it!

Years ago an old friend of my late wife asked me if I could make her look thinner for her online picture. So I did. She said it looked much better. "Could you do any more?" So I did. "Any more?" LOL I did it once more and told her if that wasn't enough she could just as well pick a model of her choosing and put her name under it! Go easy!

I only use Adobe Photoshop, but it's difficult to learn and sells for $600 or so. I usually recommend Adobe Elements. It offers much of what Photoshop does but is a little easier to learn and to pay for at under $100. I'm sure there are others that would work too, some cheaper yet.

You will not learn to do it as well as I or most other pros can do it. It's an art. I use at least a half dozen different Photoshop tools in the process, and you've got to be a bit of an artist to know what you want. That's another reason to go easy with the slimming effects -- bigger changes will be easier to spot, especially if not done expertly.

Good luck to you, should you choose to accept this mission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 05:06 AM
 
3,488 posts, read 8,220,866 times
Reputation: 3972
Thank you for the posts. I would not do a lot. Maybe a 5 - 10lb trim.
I am contemplating leaving the pic as is. It's really not dreadful and I know there's some vanity going on, but it would be nice to LOVE some of these photos.

WyoNewk - $2500 worth of prints is amazing! Sure worth a bit of photoshopping! You must have done a beautiful job on the session.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2013, 06:43 AM
 
Location: Southern New Hampshire
10,047 posts, read 18,069,717 times
Reputation: 35846
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
Almost every glamour shot that you see in magazines is touched up, so why shouldn't yours be as well?
Because it's (presumably) a candid shot of her and her new baby. What a joyful REAL moment to capture! Focus on the JOY and not on a few extra pounds that CAME from that joy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WyoNewk View Post
I got out my liposuction tool (Photoshop) and went to work, darkening the white blouse and trimming the size from a 20 to a 14. She was delighted, mom was happy that her daughter was happy, and I was happy to sell $2500 worth of prints. I didn't do enough Photoshopping that anyone else would notice, but it was enough to make her look better.

Again, I don't recommend it. But I'll happily do it for any client who asks. This isn't news photography; it's photography for hire. And if I can do it for others, you can do it for yourself. Just don't make it obvious. Subtlety is the rule. You don't want anyone to notice, so don't carve away so many pounds that people ask if you've been on a diet. You don't want to have to explain it!
Going from a 20 to a 14 isn't noticeable?!! I would bet that anyone who was at the wedding and later saw the photo would notice.

Honestly, I think this may be a generational thing. I grew up before photo retouching was the norm. My students (college age) tell me that they ROUTINELY touch up virtually every photo they take, and that basically none of their photos are "real," including the hundreds they post to Facebook. I find that baffling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top