Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008, 10:35 PM
 
13,212 posts, read 21,816,953 times
Reputation: 14115

Advertisements

Don't all cameras that support raw come with the software to adjust and convert the raw to jpg? I know Canons do. Once converted, any old image editor of choice will work fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2008, 04:40 AM
 
184 posts, read 491,232 times
Reputation: 146
Haha yes... I figured out how to open it with both my software and Gimp... I thought I said that earlier. I'm sorry if I confused anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,037,094 times
Reputation: 2044
I have started to experiment with RAW format and I have a question. You can probably place this question in the ' If you need to ask, you do not need to know' file, but I am gonna ask any ways.
My JPEG's come out of my camera at up to 4 MB. I thought that was a pretty big file. The RAW shots are like upwards to 12MB. Just what the heck is going on in there? I have done some editing and the only difference I see is a "finer tuning" ability. When I say "finer" I think I mean 'subtle'. I have yet to see any big difference in my tweaks... of course I just started playing around last night. Can anyone with hands on experience explain the reason to eat up so much space on cards, cameras and computers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Moon Over Palmettos
5,979 posts, read 19,890,481 times
Reputation: 5102
From what I read, JPEG even in its least compressed state in your camera is still compressed. RAW is as its name implies is a fully uncompressed state of the photo. It's a pain to even view and load, and the software that came with my Panasonic only has an online manual. It is sooooo difficult to understand since the terms are so technicl in nature. I'm not sure that for what I do with photos that I would be inclined to use RAW format a lot. I've been reading up on GIMP, but I thought GIMP cannot process RAW. It can process TIFF, but not RAW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:27 AM
 
Location: Zebulon, NC
2,275 posts, read 6,305,408 times
Reputation: 3622
I've used Elements for years, and early this year switched to PaintShop Pro Photo X2. I was experimenting with some photographs, and needed to use some features that were not available with Elements - I would have had to upgrade to the full version of Photoshop. No way was I spending $600 for that. I found that PaintShop Pro was able to do what I needed, and a lot more, and it only cost $79.

I'm much happier with PSP.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
I have started to experiment with RAW format and I have a question. You can probably place this question in the ' If you need to ask, you do not need to know' file, but I am gonna ask any ways.
My JPEG's come out of my camera at up to 4 MB. I thought that was a pretty big file. The RAW shots are like upwards to 12MB. Just what the heck is going on in there? I have done some editing and the only difference I see is a "finer tuning" ability. When I say "finer" I think I mean 'subtle'. I have yet to see any big difference in my tweaks... of course I just started playing around last night. Can anyone with hands on experience explain the reason to eat up so much space on cards, cameras and computers?
I'll try to answer your question in a way that makes sense. The RAW file is exactly what your camera captures, without any changes whatsoever. You could say it's like the negative, before it has been processed. The reason RAW files are so much larger than JPG is because RAW is completely unprocessed and is the original size, while a JPG file has been compressed. When you shoot in JPG, your camera processes the photo and compresses the file.

Here's a more comprehensive answer to your question.

Last edited by Claire_F; 07-21-2008 at 07:53 AM.. Reason: To answer Bulldawg's question without double posting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Here and there
1,808 posts, read 4,037,094 times
Reputation: 2044
Thanx Claire_F!

The one thing I am sure of... is that I have lots to learn! With the few pictures I took last night (none of which were any good to start with) I did not see a big difference in tweaking. I will continue to experiment... bet your flash card on it!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Right here, see??
1,401 posts, read 3,772,605 times
Reputation: 2021
I like Capture NX. ONly Nikon software will read Nikon's NEF/RAW files.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Came-by-Chance
1,793 posts, read 1,451,002 times
Reputation: 579
I use Adobe Lightroom 1.4.1, I don't believe in paying for software btw as most of it is available through P2P programs like Limewire, uTorrent etc....if somebody wants to share their files with me I have no problem with it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Covington County, Alabama
259,024 posts, read 90,550,180 times
Reputation: 138568
Quote:
Originally Posted by musincy View Post
Well I just realized I needed a plug-in. I have a Nikon D40... I haven't installed the software that came with the camera yet (I just got the camera).

The plug-in seemed to fix it with Gimp though. Gimp is a free editing program similar to Photoshop (I'm sure there are features it's missing), but I've been happy with it.

Thanks anyway for your help.
After a visit with the Canon rep at a photographic trade show, I use the software that Canon supplied with the camera to do a raw conversion to tif or jpg depending on what the image is to be used for. Once I have the tif or jpg I use photoshop. The reason for this 2 step approach Canon software knows about the Canon camera and how best to read the raw file and covert the to tif or jpg. Now Photoshop has the editing power I need after the conversion. I would think this system would apply to Nikon also. This would be a pain for a 1000 images but when you are taking must be good images it is something to consider. You may want to try it. I also shoot in RAW+JPG. That gives me a choice when I need advanced salvage mode. RAW will let you make something much better out of an image that is not exposed as well as it should have been. It is a safety net with a few holes in it. Even with RAW if it's really bad then it not going to help make it a good image. I have to shoot under adverse conditions much of the time and RAW is a must for me. See if you can shoot both at once and try it. And a word about file size, they can get big with RAW converted to tif. Whatever softare you are using for editing if it uses a scratch drive then by all means if you use one properly configured it will speed up the editing process greatly. I have not seen this commented on before. The scratch disk config is a big bottle neck is not done properly and RAW files will find it. Have fun learning and shooting that new toy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-21-2008, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
3,412 posts, read 10,167,284 times
Reputation: 2033
My main reason to shoot raw is for White balance adjustment. Especially if you're shooting people, you need that white balance to be perfect.
Exposure is another great feature that will greatly improve picture quality, along with other editing options such as saturation, shadow/highlights and contrast.

Photoshop comes in for a finishing touches, crop,curves,levels, sharpening.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top