Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2017, 05:11 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,266 posts, read 77,043,330 times
Reputation: 45612

Advertisements

Canon 7d MK II.
It is too smart for me, and I sort of miss my Canon T2i.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2017, 11:19 AM
 
147 posts, read 162,713 times
Reputation: 183
Sony a6000 with a Zeiss 16-70
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2017, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
20,292 posts, read 37,157,521 times
Reputation: 16397
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
Canon 7d MK II.
It is too smart for me, and I sort of miss my Canon T2i.
Mike,

Just watch the Canon learning videos. Some of these are at youtube, and once you master the focus-points of the 7DII, the rest will be easy. Go to "youtube" and search for, "Mastering the Canon 7D II"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2017, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Starting a walkabout
2,691 posts, read 1,665,635 times
Reputation: 3135
I still shoot with my Nikon D700. Waiting for the successor to the D810.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2017, 09:17 AM
 
4,668 posts, read 3,895,546 times
Reputation: 3437
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
I have a nearly indestructible Olympus ultra-zoom I bought about 8 years ago. It goes everywhere and does everything I ask. I refuse to pay over $500 for a camera that will tumble down a hill or get a little abuse. Having fallen off two cliffs trying to get a perfect shot, I'd rather look after myself than a super expensive camera on the way down.
When I was in college I had just purchased a Nikon D70s and took a week long trip to Mexico with some friends over spring break. We were hiking up this mountain and my camera bag somehow got unzipped and the camera fell out and took quite a tumble. It dropped about 5' out of my bag and then another 15' or so down the trail. A terrifying few moments as I ran down after my camera. Destroyed the filter and put a chip in the body. If it had been a different brand, I don't think it would have survived. I switched to Canon a few years back and the camera bodies are not nearly as durable, but I do like them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-12-2017, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Venus
5,851 posts, read 5,275,259 times
Reputation: 10756
I use my Canon PowerShot SX200 IS for our eBay business. I find it is easy to work with it on the tripod.

I LOVED my Canon PowerShot SX50 HS but it just died in April. So, I replaced it with a Canon PowerShot SX60.

I have a Canon EOS T3 but never really used it. I prefer my SX60 because I don't have to worry if I have the right lens and I can just point & shoot.


This was taken with the SX200 (which was a happy accident. I was trying to get the bee on the flower and thought that I totally missed the shot):






I took this with the SX50:






Like I said, I haven't had the SX60 too long so I haven't really taken much with it yet. And the other, I haven't really used at all.



Cat
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2017, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Idaho
6,354 posts, read 7,759,280 times
Reputation: 14183
My main body these days is a Pentax K-1. It's more than capable than I ever will be. Been a Pentaxian exclusively since I purchased my first MX back in 1976. The K-1 can use those ancient M-series lenses just fine, and since Pentax has in-body image stabilization, those old lenses are now image stabilized too. I'm happy with the results, so felt no need to switch to another brand. Pentax is quirky, but that's why we love 'em.


.
__________________


Moderator posts will always be Red and can only be discussed via Direct Message.
C-D Home page, TOS (Terms of Service), How to Search, FAQ's, Posting Guide
Moderator of Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Guns and Hunting, and Weather


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 07:59 AM
 
Location: New Mexico U.S.A.
26,527 posts, read 51,741,161 times
Reputation: 31329
I (we, my wife and I) currently are using:

Canon T3i DSLR with a Sigma 18-250mm lens. Usually my primary camera.

Panasonic Lumix FZ200. Usually my wife's primary camera, a bit smaller, lighter and less expensive than the T3i. Works out very well when shooting hand held video.

Canon PowerShot A1400. Inexpensive, compact camera which you can put in your pocket. We share it depending on where we are going to be. I initially said inexpensive as it was $98 new, however have seen it priced over $200 used at times. It has an Optical Viewfinder as well as a LCD screen. It shoots HD 720 video. It has an Optical Viewfinder as well as a LCD screen. No, it is not a perfect camera, but it has been handy.

A 55 second video created with just the A1400:

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2017, 12:23 PM
 
963 posts, read 2,301,437 times
Reputation: 2737
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
I have a nearly indestructible Olympus ultra-zoom I bought about 8 years ago. It goes everywhere and does everything I ask. I refuse to pay over $500 for a camera that will tumble down a hill or get a little abuse. Having fallen off two cliffs trying to get a perfect shot, I'd rather look after myself than a super expensive camera on the way down.
I feel the same way. I prefer to buy used cameras that I don't worry about and can take anywhere. I don't knock expensive gear, I just find that I will tend to worry too much about an expensive camera or lens rather than enjoying my photography. Fore me, the sweet spot is found with used 12-14 megapixel DSLR cameras that can be purchased for around $150.00 online. Higher spec'd cameras don't add any real world image quality for the extra money. Besides, there really is no such thing as 'disposable income,' at least, not for me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2019, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Covington County, Alabama
259,024 posts, read 90,556,021 times
Reputation: 138568
Actually a trio of Nikons now. A D5300, D7200, and a D500. They all serve a purpose and are in use not gathering dust. I'm waiting impatiently for Nikon to release a rumored replacement for the D750 with an improved focusing system like the D500 with 4k video and one or two more features like the D850 has. If it doesn't pan out then the D850 will be the replacement for the D810 I gifted to a family member.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top