Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 09-23-2009, 08:49 AM
 
Location: West Cobb County, GA (Atlanta metro)
9,191 posts, read 33,876,421 times
Reputation: 5311

Advertisements

Lots of flooding issues with folks here in Atlanta so haven't had time to post in the last few days, but I was able to make it in to work today and it's slow (no customers or employees due to the traffic/floods). Saw this article. Wow. A billionaire is installing LASERS on his fancy boat that shoot out when they detect a digital camera's CCD in use, and flash-out a photo from being captured.

Article: Russian Billionaire Installs Anti-Photo Shield on Giant Yacht | Gadget Lab | Wired.com

Now, two things: First, if this system actually works, then in theory, it could one day make it's way to other places like Federal buildings, banks, private properties, etc., where people don't want photographers to take photos. Instead of "no photography" signs, you might literally have lasers aimed at your camera.

Second thing - if you wanted to bypass it, hey, remember FILM? (no ccd, hence, no block).
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2009, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
463 posts, read 1,048,076 times
Reputation: 1304
^Wow. Yeah, that's all I got. LOL I just can't conceive spending that much money on something that frivolous.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 09:43 AM
 
13,211 posts, read 21,822,364 times
Reputation: 14123
Good catch, Greg. The article says the technology detects CCD sensors. I wonder if it detects CMOS sensors as well, which is what most high-end DSLRs use these days. Also, I'm sure the technology could be defeated by putting a mirrored filter on your lens to deflect the scanning beam.

Regardless, he'll get his butt sued off quickly enough. You can't interfere people taking pictures in a public place as pointed out in the article. Or maybe he'll shoot lasers at some government's vessel, and get his boat torpedoed in retaliation.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 10:20 AM
 
Location: New Mexico U.S.A.
26,527 posts, read 51,750,943 times
Reputation: 31329
More CSI and James Bond than practicle...

Many security cameras and targeting systems are designed to prevent laser blindness...


Rich
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 10:34 AM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,443,013 times
Reputation: 7586
Are these lasers mounted on sharks' heads?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 10:42 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
10,210 posts, read 17,864,610 times
Reputation: 13915
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdog View Post
Good catch, Greg. The article says the technology detects CCD sensors. I wonder if it detects CMOS sensors as well, which is what most high-end DSLRs use these days. Also, I'm sure the technology could be defeated by putting a mirrored filter on your lens to deflect the scanning beam.

Regardless, he'll get his butt sued off quickly enough. You can't interfere people taking pictures in a public place as pointed out in the article. Or maybe he'll shoot lasers at some government's vessel, and get his boat torpedoed in retaliation.
My thoughts exactly. Horray for CMOS! And boo to people unwilling to accept the laws of photography in public.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 11:07 AM
 
1,101 posts, read 4,328,578 times
Reputation: 1964
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Are these lasers mounted on sharks' heads?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 09:09 PM
 
Location: West Cobb County, GA (Atlanta metro)
9,191 posts, read 33,876,421 times
Reputation: 5311
I knew there were differences, but didn't realize that CCDs and CMOS chips were different enough that they'd throw off something like this. Either way I agree, people will sue about not being able to take pics from public areas. Hey, if you're going to float around on something like THAT, you should expect it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Covington County, Alabama
259,024 posts, read 90,569,549 times
Reputation: 138568
I thing he has gone a little overboard. Must be working for the KGB.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2009, 10:43 PM
 
Location: Right here, see??
1,401 posts, read 3,773,265 times
Reputation: 2021
Or maybe he just THINKS he's working for the KGB....
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Photography
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top