U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 01-18-2012, 01:52 PM
 
20,274 posts, read 13,625,417 times
Reputation: 2735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
The trouble with your analysis, BrianTH, is you never acknowledge the legacy cost issue
I acknowledge it all the time. PAT's legacy costs are in fact an ongoing problem. Unfortunately, there is very little that PAT's current management can do about those legacy costs in light of the current state laws. So, as I did above, and do all the time, I am more than happy to talk about possible state law reforms that would help PAT address those legacy costs.

What I reject, however, is the notion that doing something about PAT's legacy costs is a live alternative which could prevent these service cuts. That notion simply has no basis--there is no action pending on these issues in the state legislature, and indeed no reason to believe that the current state government would be interested in such reforms. Hence, any campaign on these issues will have to be long-term, and there is no chance of such campaign achieving results in time, not for that matter any guarantee that the savings would be enough.

Quote:
Instead, you point to the giant unicorn in Harrisburg and ask why it isn't pooping more skittles for everyone around the state so that the pensioners could have their ill-gotten pensions and the transit riders could have all the transit they would ever desire.
Again, that "unicorn" is FED BY OUR TAXES.

Seriously, you want to actually kill the unicorn, so that it neither provides "skittles" NOR eats our taxes? Be my guest--I am very confident Allegheny County would come out way ahead if you did that.

But you can't argue that we should feed the unicorn with our taxes, but then get no unicorn "skittles" in return.

Quote:
This is the position of the Transit union. Or its attorney.
No, this is the position of a person who understands:

(A) that everyone in Allegheny County has an economic stake in public transit in Allegheny County, whether they personally ride it or not; and

(B) that we're paying state transportation taxes in Allegheny County, and not getting back our fair share in non-transit state transportation funding.

Given A and B, it does not make any sense for the people of Allegheny County to accept the notion that the state should not continue to contribute funding to PAT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:11 PM
 
20,274 posts, read 13,625,417 times
Reputation: 2735
By the way, I really recommend that anyone interested in these issues look through the Commission report:

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Note that was a Commission appointed by Corbett himself, and it included a wide range of stakeholders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Park Place (East Side of Pgh)
4,200 posts, read 2,872,408 times
Reputation: 2689
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
By the way, I really recommend that anyone interested in these issues look through the Commission report:

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Note that was a Commission appointed by Corbett himself, and it included a wide range of stakeholders.
Link didn't work on my end.

How big is this report?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Mexican War Streets
1,127 posts, read 482,195 times
Reputation: 685
Quote:
Originally Posted by raubre View Post
Link didn't work on my end.

How big is this report?
40 pgs. The executive summary is 17 pgs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Park Place (East Side of Pgh)
4,200 posts, read 2,872,408 times
Reputation: 2689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobick View Post
40 pgs. The executive summary is 17 pgs.
I would think a summary would be less than one page.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-18-2012, 02:53 PM
 
20,274 posts, read 13,625,417 times
Reputation: 2735
It isn't a simple issue or proposed solution, even summarized . . . but if you skip or skim the charts and pictures in the Executive Summary and just read the text, it should only add up to a handful of pages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-19-2012, 07:06 PM
 
4,690 posts, read 1,118,798 times
Reputation: 1550
Thanks to Anthony R. Joseph, 36, of Ross, there's one less pension PAT has to pay for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-19-2012, 07:11 PM
 
Location: FC
8,803 posts, read 3,945,871 times
Reputation: 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
Thanks to Anthony R. Joseph, 36, of Ross, there's one less pension PAT has to pay for.
I doubt it. The power of unions has no boundaries. He might get a medal and a raise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-20-2012, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Park Place (East Side of Pgh)
4,200 posts, read 2,872,408 times
Reputation: 2689
Quote:
Originally Posted by h_curtis View Post
I doubt it. The power of unions has no boundaries. He might get a medal and a raise.
I hate to agree with this, but there are a handful of rude and ignorant bus drivers that are still with PAT that sghould have gotten the boot. On the other hand though, most of the bus drivers are good decent friendly people (they seem to know me since always on the bus.) It's those few bad eggs that spoil the whole bunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 01-20-2012, 07:25 AM
 
Location: FC
8,803 posts, read 3,945,871 times
Reputation: 1722
Quote:
Originally Posted by raubre View Post
I hate to agree with this, but there are a handful of rude and ignorant bus drivers that are still with PAT that sghould have gotten the boot. On the other hand though, most of the bus drivers are good decent friendly people (they seem to know me since always on the bus.) It's those few bad eggs that spoil the whole bunch.
I had a guy get off a bus and warned me that the bus driver was telling everyone on the bus that he would love to run me over on my bike and hated cyclists. He of course came really close to me and showed me he was boss. I don't like being passed by buses in the first place and will do whatever I can to avoid them, but after hearing that, I don't trust any of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top