Quote:
Originally Posted by pittnurse70
I thought determining if someplace was flat had to do with geometry. I have lived in Pittsburgh, a hilly place by everyone's accounts; Champaign, IL which is some of the flattest land in the country; and in Colorado, the "highest" state in the country (in average elevation), plus a few other places as an adult. Flat is flat, hilly is hilly, mountainous is mountainous. There is no great debate about it. The fact that Cleveland has suburbs named Bedford Heights, Cleveland Heights, Cuyahoga Heights, Garfield Heights, Maple Heights, Shaker Heights, University Heights, and Warrensville Heights should be a bit of a clue that there are hills there. The Cleveland I have seen also has lots of trees.
|
You just had to break the truce. This is so unfortunate. This is so unnessesary. I'm sorry, but defining flat vs hilly simply does have to do with where you come from, unless you can point to a clear standard. *Shrug* To someone like me Cleveland, Erie, et al are pretty flat. Sure, there are hills in a place like Erie, but I hardly notice them, why would I? Their "hill" is about a 15 degree grade over 400 feet or so. That's not a hill to me. A hill rises at about 35 degress (more or less) an the rise is far from gradual. There are hieghts around Erie, too. If you go out to Millcreek Twn on Peach St. and look down from the Wegman's parking lot, it becomes rather obvious that you are a lot higher up than downtown. But, I just don't notice it because you have to travel so far before there is a noticable change in elevation. In the same way I honestly didn't notice the hills when I was in Cleveland. To me, that means its not hilly. It certainly isn't like the places I am used to.
Looking at a topographical map right now, it looks like Clevelands "Hieghts" are similar to those around Erie... which is to say, not hills at all to someone like me.
Compared that to Pittsburgh where you can't walk three blocks without a noticable change in elevation.
Quote:
|
How do you "know" this? Is there some list? Or have you just heard people say it? Apparently you are not a follower of the arts or you would have heard of the Cleveland Symphony. I am just playing a little Devil's Advocate here.
|
I used to study paleotology... yes... I know it seems pretty unlikely for someone to study poli sci, urban planning, geography, the origins of life on earth, etc, but I have. I also know quite a bit about linguistics, history of all kinds and dabble in philosophy, theology and theoretical physics if those ever come up. Oddly, I also have a life. Anyway, Most of the books I went through often mentioned the Carnegie Museum... placing it with the best in the world (these where relatively recently written, BTW)... only criticizing it for still not placing its dinosaurs in anatomically correct possitions (the skeletons in the museum still drag their tails, we now know this to be incorrect). But the museum's retort is that their dinosaur room doesnt have the space to make the changes and they woudl have to eliminate some of the skeletons... they would rather emphasize quantity.
As for the music... to be honest, when I listen to it, unless I am in the hall, I know who wrote it the first time around, I don't pay attention to who is performing it.