![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 14,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.| Search our forums (advanced): |
![]() |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I see a lot of people griping about Pittsburgh politics on here, and I agree in large part with many of the complaints, especially the unfavorable tax structure for entering corporations. In response, I ask one simple question:
In an attempt to put aside your natural propensity to vote for one or two main personal issues, what advice can you give me as to what is the best way to vote in order to create a favorable environment for new businesses to enter the Pittsburgh region and boost the economy? (both locally and nationally if possible) P.S. Advice only, please. Lets not get into a heated debate over this. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by guylocke; 10-10-2007 at 12:31 PM.. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
A lot of Pittsburgh's problems are due to policies of at the state level. I've found the following site helpful. There is even a link that shows how to contact your state assembly representatives.
Pittsburgh's Future - Issues and opportunities affecting Pittsburgh and Southwestern Pennsylvania |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think it has to do with Philadelphia having most of the clout. Add to it the fact that Harrisburg is in eastern PA.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
...from Pittsburgh...to Scranton? (Fingers crossed!!!)
![]() LOL! Just kidding! ![]() Last edited by ScranBarre; 10-11-2007 at 02:47 PM.. Reason: Typo |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
gallacus,
To give you my two cents on your original question: Traditionally, republicans have been for lower taxes and lower spending. Thus IMO they would be better suited to create a more favorable tax and business climate. We had a republican Governor, Tom Ridge, but not a whole lot changed. Now we have "Fast Eddie" Rendell, who's proven himself to be for more of the same: high taxes and wasteful spending. His latest proposal is to toll I-80 and give the money to the grossly-inefficent and corrupt transit authorities in Philly and Pittsburgh. Ed Rendell recently beat republican candidate Lynn Swann, so that shows you where the general population stands with regard to their political beliefs. That said, I think the only way to change Pittsburgh and PA is to educate people on how our economy compares with the economy of other states (especially the booming states in the South), and how much better our economy could be. People also need to realize that the sacred-cow of organized labor is making the cost of government services much higher than it should be. After all, public-sector unions aren't taking extra money from ultra-rich robber-barons, they're taking it from the public...their neighbors! So *IF* a person can get into a public-sector union in PA, they've got it made...with wages and benefits far better than the free-market would dictate. Everyone else is stuck with a lousy economy, teacher strikes, transit strikes, and high taxes. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|