Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:16 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,879,034 times
Reputation: 4107

Advertisements

Simple question which I can't find a definitive answer to - are cyclists allowed to ride on sidewalks in Pittsburgh?
There doesn't appear to be a state law on the matter but I know Philadelphia specifically prohibits it if you're under 12 (though the fine for doing so is only $10). Does pittsburgh have any such law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:27 AM
 
1,445 posts, read 1,971,575 times
Reputation: 1190
Pennsylvania law says that it's allowed unless you're in a business district. I can't find anything specific to Pittsburgh but this Pitt Biking Guide echos the same rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:36 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,957,812 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
Pennsylvania law says that it's allowed unless you're in a business district.
This is correct. Also, this law isn't enforced in the city. I see police ride on the sidewalks while passing another cyclist on the same sidewalk in East Liberty pretty often. I have never seen a problem between a cyclists and pedestrian on the sidewalk to date in Pittsburgh. Usually the cyclists look at pedestrians as friendly and not foe because they are both not respected by motorists in our region, so they want a passing to be relaxed. Seems to work okay. Fast moving cyclists are almost always on the streets because they are wanting to go fast and a sidewalk doesn't work for them. I feel safer on the street than a sidewalk for the most part because I would be more visible and would have less chance of being right hooked. The only time I get up on the sidewalk if it isn't used much if ever, going across certain bridges that are very dangerous on the road or on really crazy streets if I am really close to my destination. I don't like riding on sidewalks for the most part because I would rather be going faster than they allow. Keep in mind, there are probably some a-hole cyclists that will hope on a sidewalk and ride like idiots, just like anything. There are always a few jerks out there walking, riding or driving. That is just life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:43 AM
 
733 posts, read 986,701 times
Reputation: 683
Yes, GeneW is right, and that's probably why it's confusing: The state law says it's legal in a non-business district and illegal in a business district.

So, what parts of PGH are officially designated "business districts?" I sure don't know. I wish the city decided to explicity prohibit biking on sidewalks inside the city limits. I think that would be a better solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 07:49 AM
 
1,445 posts, read 1,971,575 times
Reputation: 1190
It sounds good in theory to ban biking on sidewalks but Pittsburgh's roads are often so difficult for cyclists that the sidewalk is necessary. For instance, I can't blame people for riding on the sidewalk through Allegheny Center for the one little jog from Federal to West Ohio rather than follow the circle all the way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
252 posts, read 348,074 times
Reputation: 198
Quote:
Originally Posted by h_curtis View Post
This is correct. Also, this law isn't enforced in the city. I see police ride on the sidewalks while passing another cyclist on the same sidewalk in East Liberty pretty often. I have never seen a problem between a cyclists and pedestrian on the sidewalk to date in Pittsburgh. Usually the cyclists look at pedestrians as friendly and not foe because they are both not respected by motorists in our region, so they want a passing to be relaxed. Seems to work okay. Fast moving cyclists are almost always on the streets because they are wanting to go fast and a sidewalk doesn't work for them. I feel safer on the street than a sidewalk for the most part because I would be more visible and would have less chance of being right hooked. The only time I get up on the sidewalk if it isn't used much if ever, going across certain bridges that are very dangerous on the road or on really crazy streets if I am really close to my destination. I don't like riding on sidewalks for the most part because I would rather be going faster than they allow. Keep in mind, there are probably some a-hole cyclists that will hope on a sidewalk and ride like idiots, just like anything. There are always a few jerks out there walking, riding or driving. That is just life.
(emphasis added)

This is mostly right, but you should really try to ride in the street, OP. It's generally much safer for everyone. Exceptions would be riding on "paper streets", taking the sidewalk up narrow and steep streets like Bates between 376 and Blvd of the Allies, or bridge sidewalks (this is explicitly condoned with "shared sidewalk" signs on the smithfield st bridge, for example). But if there are a lot of people on the sidewalk and you're going more than 4-5mph, you should really consider what you're doing there.

Consider, for example, that people exiting buildings never look for cyclists, and if you're going to fast too stop, things could get really nasty. Drivers are looking for pedestrians at intersections, not cyclists flying out from behind trees or other obstructions suddenly into the street. Pedestrians often stop, turn around, stretch, etc. The road has rules and patterns for managing fast movement, but the sidwalk is often unpredictable and relies on the assumption that it takes almost no time to stop when you're walking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 08:53 AM
 
1,947 posts, read 2,242,702 times
Reputation: 1292
I hop on sidewalks occasionally around CMU/Pitt for short distances to avoid messy traffic patterns around Schenley Park. Cops often drive past and never care. Just be careful and be nice to peeps without bikes

BTW UKyank, not a Rugby follower are you? Lions series? I'm trying to find a venue that might show it (all non UK/Antipodean readers can safely ignore this!!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:07 AM
 
6,601 posts, read 8,975,035 times
Reputation: 4699
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneW View Post
It sounds good in theory to ban biking on sidewalks but Pittsburgh's roads are often so difficult for cyclists that the sidewalk is necessary. For instance, I can't blame people for riding on the sidewalk through Allegheny Center for the one little jog from Federal to West Ohio rather than follow the circle all the way around.
If the city did outlaw cycling on sidewalks, they could always make sections like that into official bike lanes.

I like the current law. Outside of business districts cyclists on the sidewalk don't pose much trouble to anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:09 AM
 
Location: O'Hara Twp.
4,359 posts, read 7,526,102 times
Reputation: 1611
Quote:
Originally Posted by grep View Post
(emphasis added)

This is mostly right, but you should really try to ride in the street, OP. It's generally much safer for everyone. Exceptions would be riding on "paper streets", taking the sidewalk up narrow and steep streets like Bates between 376 and Blvd of the Allies, or bridge sidewalks (this is explicitly condoned with "shared sidewalk" signs on the smithfield st bridge, for example). But if there are a lot of people on the sidewalk and you're going more than 4-5mph, you should really consider what you're doing there.

Consider, for example, that people exiting buildings never look for cyclists, and if you're going to fast too stop, things could get really nasty. Drivers are looking for pedestrians at intersections, not cyclists flying out from behind trees or other obstructions suddenly into the street. Pedestrians often stop, turn around, stretch, etc. The road has rules and patterns for managing fast movement, but the sidwalk is often unpredictable and relies on the assumption that it takes almost no time to stop when you're walking.
Just a guess but cycling on the Smithfield Street is probably accepted because it is used to connect the two trails.

Since I am not much of a cyclist anymore, do cyclists actually feel comfortable riding on a road where the speed is high, say 45- 55 mph? I am a runner and I really don't like running or roads where the speed limit it that high unless there is a large space on the side of the road. It is one thing to pick a road as a commuter (not sure of a better term) where you have to ride on a busy road but some pleasure cyclists pick busy roads to ride on. I just don't get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2013, 09:17 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,879,034 times
Reputation: 4107
Quote:
Originally Posted by gortonator View Post
BTW UKyank, not a Rugby follower are you? Lions series? I'm trying to find a venue that might show it (all non UK/Antipodean readers can safely ignore this!!)
For live coverage the time zones disparity makes it impossible for any places to be open to show it; not sure if any places show replays.
For other rugby series that are played at more decent hours (like the 6 nations), you can find them shown at either Pipers Pub or Ruggers Pub, both in the southside
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top