Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-08-2017, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,009,810 times
Reputation: 12401

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
And that land became available because those that owned that land took the money rather than continuing to farm it.

The area would've grown whether it was in Allegheny County or not due to less land being available just north of it, however, not being in Allegheny County made/makes it even more appealing and a reason it continues to boom.
The tax situation (mostly not doing a reassessment since 1969) has certainly helped. It's basically created a situation where taxes on new construction homes in the Cranberry/Adams area are lower than they would otherwise be, while those in the still declining northern portions of the county have artificially high taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2017, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,186,657 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
The tax situation (mostly not doing a reassessment since 1969) has certainly helped. It's basically created a situation where taxes on new construction homes in the Cranberry/Adams area are lower than they would otherwise be, while those in the still declining northern portions of the county have artificially high taxes.
Don't tell anyone, but we'd pay higher taxes here in Cranberry. It's far too convenient here to want to leave.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 02:42 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,352 posts, read 17,009,810 times
Reputation: 12401
Quote:
Originally Posted by erieguy View Post
Don't tell anyone, but we'd pay higher taxes here in Cranberry. It's far too convenient here to want to leave.
I don't think it would scare off too many existing residents. It would cool off construction of new subdivisions however, as higher taxes would be priced into the new builds selling prices, making them less cost competitive with subdivisions built in the North Hills within Allegheny County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
3,298 posts, read 3,887,301 times
Reputation: 3141
This will be another Uber bust. Amazon has exaggerated their potential presence to get the most freebies from cities. 50,000 high paying jobs? Yeah, right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 03:50 PM
 
5,110 posts, read 7,136,874 times
Reputation: 3116
Quote:
This will be another Uber bust. Amazon has exaggerated their potential presence to get the most freebies from cities. 50,000 high paying jobs? Yeah, right.
Given the needs of Amazon, it's not a bust. They have real expansion plans. That said, 50K is very high. However, a 1,000 person HQ is significant to any city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
3,298 posts, read 3,887,301 times
Reputation: 3141
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeP View Post
Given the needs of Amazon, it's not a bust. They have real expansion plans. That said, 50K is very high. However, a 1,000 person HQ is significant to any city.
I can believe a number closer to 1,000. Amazon promises thousands of jobs when they bring distribution centers to cities and they end up automating the plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:03 PM
 
716 posts, read 764,956 times
Reputation: 1013
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluecarebear View Post
This will be another Uber bust.
What is this Uber bust you speak of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,018 posts, read 18,186,657 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mtl-Cns View Post
What is this Uber bust you speak of?
Curious to this myself. The more the merrier, here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:42 PM
 
994 posts, read 900,500 times
Reputation: 923
The problem for Pittsburgh getting Amazon's second headquarters is that the city does not have a strong mass transit system, and Amazon's core preferences for this location include "direct access to mass transit", which pretty much dooms Pittsburgh. Sure, the city will do a song a dance routine about how the BRT can be extended to the Hazelwood site, but at the end of the day Pittsburgh's lack of mass transit planning for decades will do it in. Plus, the Hazelwood location would be a logistical nightmare if tens of thousands of new commuters suddenly started commuting there because the bottlenecks that would exist.

Peduto will however come up with some nonsense about the private access road from Oakland to Hazlewood being just for Amazon commuters in self driving vehicles, which won't work when cities like Boston and DC have such strong mass transit systems in place.

Last edited by MountainDewGuy; 09-08-2017 at 04:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2017, 04:46 PM
 
146 posts, read 133,655 times
Reputation: 383
I don't think Pittsburgh will be an option for this, although we'll be given a look. 50k employees would be like adding another upmc here. That's way too large for the area. I've read several articles stating that we have around 45k tech workers in the region. So, even if 40k out of the 50k employees needed are tech workers, that really isn't enough. The 45k tech workers we have are not all unemployed and I doubt Amazon wants to hire every single one. All companies want to have a big pool of applicants to pick from to keep wages low and Amazon just wouldn't have that here for HQ2. I see them going to Dallas because of the bigger population size compared to Pittsburgh and Austin. Whole Foods HQ is in Austin and Bezos has a big ranch in TX. Plus, TX is a very business friendly state, especially with taxes. PA has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the nation and does not give nearly the amount of subsides that other states give.

PA lowering its corp tax rate would bring in a ton of companies from the northeast, but we've decided to go another route with taxing energy companies and putting casinos everywhere. I'm sure our masters in Harrisburg know what they're doing. Besides, they've already granted us the luxury of purchasing beer at Giant Eagle, so we can't complain too much. We have it pretty good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top