U.S. Cities  
Merry Christmas!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 04-27-2009, 12:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philly
1,021 posts, read 441,468 times
Reputation: 159
pman has a spectacular aura aboutpman has a spectacular aura aboutpman has a spectacular aura aboutpman has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapp View Post
The way I look at it is that there is a finite amount of development resources that the city (or school district) can apply towards development and improvements. In the case of family-friendly residential development, what I am saying is that I would much rather see the city invest on improving what it already has outside of Downtown rather than try to create something new Downtown.
downtown already exists, why not make the most of it? I think it will pay huge dividends for Pitt in the long run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2009, 07:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
3,763 posts, read 1,959,131 times
Reputation: 284
BrianTH is a jewel in the roughBrianTH is a jewel in the roughBrianTH is a jewel in the roughBrianTH is a jewel in the roughBrianTH is a jewel in the roughBrianTH is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrapp View Post
The way I look at it is that there is a finite amount of development resources that the city (or school district) can apply towards development and improvements. In the case of family-friendly residential development, what I am saying is that I would much rather see the city invest on improving what it already has outside of Downtown rather than try to create something new Downtown.
I'm not sure that premise is correct. The amount of resources available for development tends to be a function of expected future demand in the anticipated markets for the developed assets. So if two different neighborhoods would be likely to serve at least somewhat different markets, they would not necessarily be drawing from the same pool of potential resources. And in this case, I think that is true of Downtown versus the East End: the potential markets, including the family segment of the markets, are not exactly the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top