Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:50 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 32,857,468 times
Reputation: 2910

Advertisements

So I just stumbled across this dataset, which is interesting to me:

Estimated Daytime Population

Using 2000 Census data, the Census estimated what was happening to the daytime populations of various places due to commuters (non-residents coming in to the place to work). The following is a table I extracted of the percent increase in daytime population due to net commuting (only for the central cities of larger metros):

Washington (DC) 71.8
Orlando 70.7
Atlanta 67.4
Tampa 47.5
Pittsburgh 41.3
Boston 41.1
Miami 37.3
St Louis 35.1
Cincy 31.0
Seattle 28.4
Denver 28.0
Minneapolis 25.0 (St Paul 14.5)
Sacramento 24.8
Cleveland 24.0
Kansas City 23.1
Portland (OR) 23.0
San Francisco 21.7
Charlotte 21.2
Houston 20.6
Dallas 19.1
Indianapolis 15.6
Baltimore 14.2
San Diego 11.6
Columbus (OH) 11.6
Phoenix 7.3
New York 7.0
Philly 5.9
Chicago 4.9
LA 3.5
Las Vegas 2.3
Detroit -0.1
San Jose -5.6

Part of what is going on here is just something we have discussed before, which is that the City of Pittsburgh includes a smaller-than-average percentage of Metropolitan Area residents, which in turn is likely to lead to more of the people working in the City being non-residents. Still, regardless of the causes, this data does have implications for issues such as what sort of contribution non-residents should be making to help fund City services and amenities.

Last edited by BrianTH; 01-11-2010 at 09:16 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:55 AM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,846,089 times
Reputation: 3051
Unless I'm reading this wrong....with all the People that come from CT and PA and far reaches of NJ it shocks me that NYC is so low, i would've thought it would be as high as DC.

Hell People commute from the Philly metro to NYC everyday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 09:01 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 32,857,468 times
Reputation: 2910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
Unless I'm reading this wrong....with all the People that come from CT and PA and far reaches of NJ it shocks me that NYC is so low, i would've thought it would be as high as DC.
Initially I thought it would have been higher in NYC too, but then I realized how many people actually live in largely residential sections of the outer boroughs.

So it actually turns out NYC had the highest number of net commuters in the country (563060, to Washington's 410794). But because its resident population base is 8 million, that is still only a 7% increase. I bet it would be much larger if you looked just at Manhattan, however.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 09:13 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 32,857,468 times
Reputation: 2910
So quickly, here are the top cities by net number of commuters, unfiltered down through Philly (so not a total overlap with the last table):

563,060 New York city, NY
410,794 Washington city, DC
403,313 Houston city, TX
259,957 Atlanta city, GA
242,092 Boston city, MA
227,555 Dallas city, TX
168,747 San Francisco city, CA
160,043 Seattle city, WA
155,486 Denver city, CO
144,051 Tampa city, FL
142,328 Chicago city, IL
141,927 San Diego city, CA
138,191 Pittsburgh city, PA
95,476 Minneapolis city, MN (41,497 St. Paul city, MN)
135,066 Miami city, FL
131,501 Orlando city, FL
131,180 Salt Lake City city, UT
127,877 Los Angeles city, CA
127,328 Austin city, TX
122,234 St. Louis city, MO
121,962 Indianapolis city (balance), IN
121,743 Portland city, OR
115,806 Paradise CDP, NV
114,840 Cleveland city, OH
114,655 Charlotte city, NC
106,202 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN
105,637 Irvine city, CA
102,743 Memphis city, TN
102,720 Cincinnati city, OH
101,966 Kansas City city, MO
100,933 Sacramento city, CA
96,120 Phoenix city, AZ
94,645 Oklahoma City city, OK
93,305 Honolulu CDP, HI
92,625 Baltimore city, MD
90,230 Philadelphia city, PA

Pittsburgh drops a little bit . . . but it is still higher than you would have thought given its relative metro area population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:04 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,219 posts, read 16,720,686 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
Unless I'm reading this wrong....with all the People that come from CT and PA and far reaches of NJ it shocks me that NYC is so low, i would've thought it would be as high as DC.

Hell People commute from the Philly metro to NYC everyday.
while there are people from philly who do that, it's not really that many in the scheme of things.

I'd be careful what I read into from these statistics. I don't agree with the OP's conclusion that it necessarily reflects the size of the city vs the metro. certainly that's a factor (and for DC, it's probably a relatively large factor, though the cost of living in DC certainly exacerbates that). for philly it's relatively small. that's partly because of the fact it's twice the size of pitt in land area but still, it's only 1.5 million out of nearly 6 million people. more likely, it also reflects the fact that they've experienced a net loss in jobs over the last few decades that the wage tax, once as high as 4.95% (now 3.93%) self selects. fewer people from the suburbs are willing to take those now smaller number of jobs. in other words, it's partly a reflection of the weakness of the CBD's job base. OTOH, pittsburgh's CBD is relatively healthy. DC has an enormous of amount of federal jobs located in the city's core. Third, and am using Philly as a comparison because I know it well, Pittsburgh's residential population downtown is small. Philadelphia has 90k downtown residents so let's say, 35k leave for work outside the CBD and 100k come in, that's a net of 100k whereas if no one lived there, it might be a net of 95k. If this looks at the city as a whole, then it could well reflect that more and more Philadelphians are commuting to the suburbs, offsetting the influx of suburbanites. If Pittsburgh's downtown population balloons to 25k, it could well impact this figure. plenty of people live in manhattan as well, I imagine if you looked at downtown or midtown alone, you'd have a different percentage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:13 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 32,857,468 times
Reputation: 2910
Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
I don't agree with the OP's conclusion that it necessarily reflects the size of the city vs the metro. certainly that's a factor . . .
To clarify, I stated originally, "Part of what is going on here is just something we have discussed before, which is that the City of Pittsburgh includes a smaller-than-average percentage of Metropolitan Area residents," which I believe would be the same thing as saying "that's a factor". I would agree other factors are likely involved as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:28 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 32,857,468 times
Reputation: 2910
By the way, here is a small list of some metros comparable in size and weighted density to the Pittsburgh metro, ranked by the percentage of the metro population that resides in the central city, with the commuter percentage in parens:

San Antonio 67% (5.9)
San Diego 43% (11.6)
Portland 26% (23.0)
Denver 24% (28.0)
Sacramento 24% (24.8)
Seattle 18% (28.4)
Pittsburgh 13% (41.3)

That isn't anything close to a real study, but I think it confirms both that this is one of the explanatory factors, but also likely not the only explanatory factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Philly
10,219 posts, read 16,720,686 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
To clarify, I stated originally, "Part of what is going on here is just something we have discussed before, which is that the City of Pittsburgh includes a smaller-than-average percentage of Metropolitan Area residents," which I believe would be the same thing as saying "that's a factor". I would agree other factors are likely involved as well.
and the part that seemed most important to your pet issue I assume.
from the press release
Quote:
The places where the largest percent increases in daytime over nighttime populations occur tend to be those with small resident populations.
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/005822.html (broken link)

of course, that press release doesn't tell much. where's that study about commuting patterns, and city share of jobs in the metro?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,316 posts, read 120,147,178 times
Reputation: 35920
So more Pittsburghers live in the burbs than San Antonians, San Diegans, Portlanders, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:35 AM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,846,089 times
Reputation: 3051
Quote:
Originally Posted by pman View Post
while there are people from philly who do that, it's not really that many in the scheme of things.

I'd be careful what I read into from these statistics. I don't agree with the OP's conclusion that it necessarily reflects the size of the city vs the metro. certainly that's a factor (and for DC, it's probably a relatively large factor, though the cost of living in DC certainly exacerbates that). for philly it's relatively small. that's partly because of the fact it's twice the size of pitt in land area but still, it's only 1.5 million out of nearly 6 million people. more likely, it also reflects the fact that they've experienced a net loss in jobs over the last few decades that the wage tax, once as high as 4.95% (now 3.93%) self selects. fewer people from the suburbs are willing to take those now smaller number of jobs. in other words, it's partly a reflection of the weakness of the CBD's job base. OTOH, pittsburgh's CBD is relatively healthy. DC has an enormous of amount of federal jobs located in the city's core. Third, and am using Philly as a comparison because I know it well, Pittsburgh's residential population downtown is small. Philadelphia has 90k downtown residents so let's say, 35k leave for work outside the CBD and 100k come in, that's a net of 100k whereas if no one lived there, it might be a net of 95k. If this looks at the city as a whole, then it could well reflect that more and more Philadelphians are commuting to the suburbs, offsetting the influx of suburbanites. If Pittsburgh's downtown population balloons to 25k, it could well impact this figure. plenty of people live in manhattan as well, I imagine if you looked at downtown or midtown alone, you'd have a different percentage.
Trust me that number is not as small as you think....I was reading somewhere (I think Phillyblog) that Bucks county is becoming more and more a bedroom community for NYC than it is for Philly even though it is the Philly Metro..Same with South Jersey alot people make that commute every day, so much so Greyhound and Academy runs serveral commuter buses from the area to PA bus term.


Also I think you have to look at the fact that Philadelpia Metro has a large commuter Sprawl... I've seen regional rail lines just as crowded on the reverse commute as the forward...

With living in Pittsburgh, Philly, DC and NYC....Philadelphia was the only city were people commute to work all over the place, in other words if there was a statistic of number of residents who commute in to the suburbs for work....Philly would have to be at the top of that list.

- All of Philadelphia surrounding counties have serveral healthy busniess parks, Horsham, KOP, West Chester, Bucks County, Willow Grove, etc etc etc.

Pittsburgh NY and DC an overwhelming majority of the Metro goes into the CBD's work....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top