Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-02-2010, 11:12 AM
 
366 posts, read 943,867 times
Reputation: 118

Advertisements

Still a huge incentive. Figure at least $4500 - $5000 a year. Take 70-80% of that number (depending on your federal tax bracket) and that is what you save per year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-02-2010, 11:23 AM
 
20,273 posts, read 33,003,811 times
Reputation: 2911
Given the expected post-abatement property taxes and increase in local income taxes, sales taxes, and so on, usually a well-designed abatement program is a good idea financially for the taxing jurisdiction, as long as it really is necessary and effective when it comes to developing the relevant units. Basically, it makes economic sense to subsidize long-term capital improvements and get back that investment later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-02-2010, 09:37 PM
 
809 posts, read 2,408,963 times
Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTH View Post
--The proper development of the North Shore is an interesting topic. In an ideal world we would have never torn apart the City of Allegheny and we could treat that area like the South Side. But given where we were starting, I don't really see that area effectively competing with lots of other areas in the City, including the Strip and Downtown itself, when it comes to developing new residential units. Meanwhile, things like stadiums and casinos and office parks aren't necessarily conducive to developing residential areas, so I actually think it is handy we have a convenient place to concentrate that stuff while focusing on other areas for new residential.

It's really quite sad that the North Side is in such a state of disrepair.

If it was left mostly intact, it could have very well been Pittsburgh's version of NYC's Park Slope. The Mexican War Streets still capture a little bit of that, and West Park(or what's left of it) is still rather stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2010, 03:52 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,269,927 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by gameguy56 View Post
It's really quite sad that the North Side is in such a state of disrepair.

If it was left mostly intact, it could have very well been Pittsburgh's version of NYC's Park Slope. The Mexican War Streets still capture a little bit of that, and West Park(or what's left of it) is still rather stunning.
That's the absolute truth.
No foresight in that fiasco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 11:56 AM
 
135 posts, read 387,150 times
Reputation: 45
Pittsburgh needs to put in effect more green requirements for builders, the use of natural light and using more open floor plans and efficient heating and cooling and use the roof as a green space for the occupants and it will also cool the area and can be a nice place for entertaining, with all the new solar and wind generating options available one can turn a building this size into a generating plant and still be very aesthetically pleasing to the eyes and be very environmentally responsible reusing rainwater for washing clothes or bathing and using that water to water the rooftop gardens, toilets that turn the waste to ash that can be used to fertilize local parks or the roof top gardens,the use of natural light and open space design to make use of the light and renewable heating sources, in fact there is alot of tech out there that can reduce a buildings energy consumption between 25 and 49% easily.
I really hope thay are considering it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 01:56 PM
 
Location: RVA
2,420 posts, read 4,710,692 times
Reputation: 1212
I think it stinks. There's something more than a little fishy about it. It just sounds like a scheme for the loan sharks to make some extra clams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2010, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,529 posts, read 17,535,105 times
Reputation: 10634
Quote:
Originally Posted by creepsinc View Post
I think it stinks. There's something more than a little fishy about it. It just sounds like a scheme for the loan sharks to make some extra clams.
Pun city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top