U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-16-2007, 03:55 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
7 posts, read 7,596 times
Reputation: 12
MixedFeelings is on a distinguished road
Default Thanks likepbh

For sure Sq. Hill seems like a good deal to us - coming from CA - it is embarassing how much we pay for houses out here.

Also, in doing the worst case scenario calculations Hopes suggests, you might find that full reassessment to sale price values don't sting quite as bad at they look: remember you can decuct these property taxes from your federal taxable income value. So, if you are in the tax bracket we are - this helps a lot. Rough figures show that a $10,000 increase in local property taxes will actually cost us some $6,000.

It's not pretty, but $6,000 is sure better than $10,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2007, 11:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Central PA
351 posts, read 309,831 times
Reputation: 77
bboy36win will become famous soon enoughbboy36win will become famous soon enough
Default ... so, to summarize ...

So ... if I buy a house in Allegheny County in 2007 for, say, $200,000, and the house I'm buying has a 2002-base-year assessed value of, say, $100,000, then the assessed value of my home (for tax purposes) will not change, and I will pay the same propertay taxes as what the seller paid ... until the whole county reassesses ... at which time the school districts and municipalities are legally required to adjust their millage rates down to compensate (unless they have otherwise independently voted to increase taxes in their district).

Is that right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2007, 12:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
6,291 posts, read 3,873,223 times
Reputation: 1326
Hopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud ofHopes has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by bboy36win View Post
Is that right?
Not necessarily. Just plan on eventually having to pay taxes based on the purchase price, and you'll be financially prepared.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2007, 07:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
7 posts, read 7,596 times
Reputation: 12
MixedFeelings is on a distinguished road
Default Almost right, bboy36win, I think

You write: "So ... if I buy a house in Allegheny County in 2007 for, say, $200,000, and the house I'm buying has a 2002-base-year assessed value of, say, $100,000, then the assessed value of my home (for tax purposes) will not change, and I will pay the same propertay taxes as what the seller paid ... until the whole county reassesses ... at which time the school districts and municipalities are legally required to adjust their millage rates down to compensate (unless they have otherwise independently voted to increase taxes in their district).

Is that right?"

Yes - the assessed (2002) value does not automatically change to the new sale price.

BUT there is one more way your taxes can go up (and is currently the most common way): you get your property's assessed value challenged by the school board (or someone else) and you lose that challenge. However (as we have heard) many who have been through this still ultimately had the value of their house rolled back to 2002 values thanks to another court ruling. My biggest confusion is why these challenges are still going on even though most of the assesed value increases have been set aside.

AND, while I agree with Hopes that it is best to be prepared to pay the taxes on your full purchase price, there seems to be significant evidence that: 1) you won't have to pay this amount right away, 2) you may go multiple years without paying it, and 3) the whole system may be forced to change within the next 3-5 years, in which case there is no telling what kind of value and tax rate you will have; could be good, could be bad. 4) If the 2006 law is still in effect, your local taxes cannot increase in dollar value unless a local tax increase vote passes first.

Checks and balances, sort of?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2007, 11:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Central PA
351 posts, read 309,831 times
Reputation: 77
bboy36win will become famous soon enoughbboy36win will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by MixedFeelings View Post
BUT there is one more way your taxes can go up (and is currently the most common way): you get your property's assessed value challenged by the school board (or someone else) and you lose that challenge. However (as we have heard) many who have been through this still ultimately had the value of their house rolled back to 2002 values thanks to another court ruling. My biggest confusion is why these challenges are still going on even though most of the assesed value increases have been set aside.
Yes, I find the while "challenge" thing to be confusing, as well. Perhaps the courts did, too.

Seems awfully arbitrary to me. (I'm picturing a fresh-faced county employee spending his days at the courthouse's recorder of deeds, looking over real estate transactions, hoping to find one whose sale price represents a large enough increase over the 2002 assessed value that he can shout - with joy - "Here's one we can go after!").
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top